Journals / Türk Göğüs Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Dergisi / 2006 / Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 4

Measurement of the quality of life in CABG patients with left ventricular dysfunction

Sol ventrikül disfonksiyonlu ameliyat olmuş koroner arter hastalarında yaşam kalitesi ölçümü

Pages
266–271
Publication Date
2022-09-02
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

There was no statistically significant correlation between the number of questions answered as “true” and ejection fractions of the patients (r=-0.132; p=0.48).Conclusion: “LVD-36” is a simple, useful, easily applicable and repeatable test for the evaluation of the beneficial effects of surgery, follow-up and life quality assessment of patients with coronary artery bypass grafting and chronic left ventricular systolic dysfunction.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background: The results of “Left ventricular dysfunction 36 questionnaire” (LVD-36) which consists of 36 questions for the assessment of the quality of life in operated patients with coronary artery disease and chronic left ventricular systolic dysfunction, were compared with the results of cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET).Methods: A total of 36 patients (27 males, 9 females, mean age 59±6 years; range 44-69) with ejection fraction (EF) of ≤%40 were included in this study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Simultaneously they were required to answer; LVD-36 test as “true” or “false”.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:There was no statistically significant correlation between the number of questions answered as “true” and ejection fractions of the patients (r=-0.132; p=0.48).Conclusion: “LVD-36” is a simple, useful, easily applicable and repeatable test for the evaluation of the beneficial effects of surgery, follow-up and life quality assessment of patients with coronary artery bypass grafting and chronic left ventricular systolic dysfunction.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background: The results of “Left ventricular dysfunction 36 questionnaire” (LVD-36) which consists of 36 questions for the assessment of the quality of life in operated patients with coronary artery disease and chronic left ventricular systolic dysfunction, were compared with the results of cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET).Methods: A total of 36 patients (27 males, 9 females, mean age 59±6 years; range 44-69) with ejection fraction (EF) of ≤%40 were included in this study. Breath by breath CPET was performed to all subjects. Simultaneously they were required to answer; LVD-36 test as “true” or “false”. Total number of questions that were answered as “true” was determined and the relationship between these and CPET was assessed.Results: There was an inverse correlation with peak VO2 (ml/min/kg) values and the number of questions answered as “true”. As the functional capacity of the patients decreased the number of questions they answered as “true” increased. (r=-0.402; p=0.002). There was no statistically significant correlation between the number of questions answered as “true” and ejection fractions of the patients (r=-0.132; p=0.48).Conclusion: “LVD-36” is a simple, useful, easily applicable and repeatable test for the evaluation of the beneficial effects of surgery, follow-up and life quality assessment of patients with coronary artery bypass grafting and chronic left ventricular systolic dysfunction.

Özet

Amaç: Kronik sol ventrikül sistolik disfonksiyonlu ameliyat olmuş koroner arter hastalarında, yaşam kalitelerini 36 adet soruyla değerlendiren “left ventricular dysfunction 36 questionnaire” (LVD-36) anketi, kardiyopulmoner egzersiz testi (KPET) sonuçları ile karşılaştırıldı.Çalışma planı: Çalışmaya ejeksiyon fraksiyonu (EF) ≤%40 olan 36 olgu (27 erkek, 9 kadın; ort. yaş 59±6 yıl; dağılım 44-69) alındı. Olgulara solunumdan solunuma KPET uygulandı. Aynı süreç içerisinde “LVD-36” sorularına “doğru” ve “yanlış” olmak üzere yanıt vermeleri istendi. Daha sonra hastaların “doğru” olarak nitelendirdikleri soru adedi toplandı, KPET sonuçları ile ilişkisi araştırıldı.Bulgular: Hastaların pik VO2 değerleri ile (ml/dk/kg), doğru olarak işaretledikleri soru sayısı arasında negatif ilişki olduğu dikkat çekti. Hastaların fonksiyonel kapasiteleri azaldıkça, testteki sorular için daha çok “doğru” seçeneğini işaretledikleri gözlendi (r=-0.402; p=0.002). Testte işaretlenen “doğru” seçeneği sayısı ile ejeksiyon fraksiyonu arasında ise anlamlı ilişki olmadığı saptandı (r=-0.132; p=0.48).Sonuç: Aorta koroner bypass geçiren sol ventrikül disfonksiyonlu olgularda, ameliyatın yararlılığının değerlendirilmesinde, hastaların takibinde ve yaşam kalitesi sorgulanmasında “LVD-36” yaşam kalitesi testinin yararlı, uygulaması ve tekrarlaması kolay bir test olduğunu düşünmekteyiz.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKA, A. S., EREN, E. E., KURÇ, E., ŞENAY, Ş., TAŞDEMİR, M., YÜCEL, O., ORHAN, G., TARTAN, Z. (2022). Measurement of the quality of life in CABG patients with left ventricular dysfunction. Türk Göğüs Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Dergisi, Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 4, 266–271. https://ajindex.com/articles/425229

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Penttilla HJ, Lepojarvi MV, Kiviluoma KT, Kaukoranta PK, Hassinen IE, Peuhkurinen KJ. Myocardial preservation during coronary surgery with and without cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg 2001;71:565-71
  2. Silistreli E, Oto Ö. Son dönem kalp yetmezliğinde uygulanan cerrahi tedavi modaliteleri. Türk Göğüs Kalp Damar Cer Derg 1999;7:161-9
  3. Hamulu A, Özbaran M, Atay Y, Posacıoğlu H, Aras İ, Büket S ve ark. Koroner bypass ameliyatında mortalite ve morbiditeye etki eden risk faktörlerinin belirlenmesi ve değerlendirilmesi. Türk Göğüs Kalp Damar Cer Derg 1995;3:245 52
  4. Nollert G, Schmoeckel M, Markewitz A, Mattke S, Kreuzer E, Uberfuhr P, et al. Surgical therapy for coronary artery disease in patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction of 25% or less. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 1997;38:389-95
  5. O'Leary CJ, Jones PW. The left ventricular dysfunction questionnaire (LVD 36): reliability, validity, and responsiveness. Heart 2000;83:634-40
  6. Wasserman K, Hansen JE, Sue DY, Whipp BJ, Casaburi R, editors. Principles of exercise testing and interpretation. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger; 1994. p. 53-111
  7. Coronary artery surgery study (CASS): a randomized trial of coronary artery bypass surgery. Survival data. Circulation 1983;68:939-50
  8. Lawrie GM, Morris GC Jr, Earle N. Long-term results of coronary bypass surgery: analysis of 1698 patients followed 15 to 20 years. Ann Surg 1991;213:377-85
  9. Braunwald E, Colucci WS, Grossman W. Clinical aspects of heart failure: high output heart failure; pulmonary edema. In: Braunwald E, editor. Heart disease. A textbook of cardiovascular medicine. 5th ed. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders; 1997. p. 445-70
  10. Rector TS, Kubo SH, Cohn JN. Patients' self-assessment of their congestive heart failure: content, reliability and validity of a new measure, the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure questionnaire. Heart Failure 1987;3:198 209
  11. Gjeilo KH, Wahba A, Klepstad P, Lydersen S, Stenseth R. Health-related quality of life three years after coronary surgery: a comparison with the general population. Scand Cardiovasc J 2006;40:29-36
  12. Fleg JL, Pina IL, Balady GJ, Chaitman BR, Fletcher B, Lavie C, et al. Assessment of functional capacity in clinical and research applications: An advisory from the Committee on Exercise, Rehabilitation, and Prevention, Council on Clinical Cardiology, American Heart Association. Circulation 2000;102:1591-7
  13. Ehsani AA, Biello D, Seals DR, Austin MB, Schultz J. The effec