Journals / Türk Göğüs Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Dergisi / 2007 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 4

Neurocognitive effects of cardiopulmonary bypass in coronary artery bypass surgery

Koroner arter bypass cerrahisinde kardiyopulmoner bypass’ın nörokognitif fonksiyonlara etkisi

Pages
275–280
Publication Date
2022-09-02
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Decrease in cognitive functions is not significant.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background: We evaluated the effect of cardiopulmonary bypass on neurocognitive functions in patients undergoing coronary bypass surgery.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: This prospective study included 36 patients (24 women, 12 men; mean age 57±2 years) who underwent coronary artery bypass surgery.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Decrease in cognitive functions is not significant.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background: We evaluated the effect of cardiopulmonary bypass on neurocognitive functions in patients undergoing coronary bypass surgery. Methods: This prospective study included 36 patients (24 women, 12 men; mean age 57±2 years) who underwent coronary artery bypass surgery. The patients were administered a neurocognitive test battery before and one month after surgery, including the Health-Related Quality of Life (SF-36), Standardized Mini-Mental State Examination, Hamilton Anxiety Scale, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, and Epworth Sleepiness Scale. In addition, demographic data and hemodynamic parameters of the patients were evaluated.Results: Compared to the preoperative scores, significant improvements were found in the psychologic and motor or physical function subsets of the SF-36 and Hamilton Anxiety Scale after the operation (p 0.05). There was a decrease in the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index and an increase in the Epworth Sleepiness Scale, but both did not reach a significant level.Conclusion: Coronary bypass surgery improves the patients’ quality of life, but it significantly decreases motor and psychologic parameters. Decrease in cognitive functions is not significant.

Özet

Amaç: Koroner arter cerrahisi geçiren hastalarda kardiyopulmoner bypass uygulamasının nörokognitif fonksiyonlara etkisi değerlendirildi. Çalışma planı: Koroner arter bypass greft ameliyatı geçiren 36 hasta (24 kadın, 12 erkek; ort. yaş 57±2) ileriye dönük olarak çalışmaya alındı. Hastalara ameliyat öncesi ve ameliyat sonrası birinci ayda nörokognitif testler (Yaşam Kalitesi SF-36 testi, Standardize Mini- Mental Test, Hamilton Anksiyete Ölçeği, Pitsburg Uyku Kalite İndeksi ve Epworth Uykululuk Testi) uygulandı. Hastaların demografik ve hemodinamik özellikleri değerlendirildi.Bulgular: Ameliyat öncesi ve sonrası değerler karşılaştırıldığında, Yaşam Kalitesi SF-36 testi ve Hamilton Anksiyete Ölçeği’nde psikolojik ve motor ya da fiziksel fonksiyon altgruplarında ameliyattan sonra anlamlı artış görüldü (p 0.05). Pittsburgh ve Epworth testlerinde ise sırasıyla anlamlı olmayan azalma ve artış görüldü.Sonuç: Koroner bypass cerrahisi hastaların yaşam kalitesini artırmaktadır. Hamilton motor ve psikolojik anksiyete değerlendirmesinde her iki parametrede azalma görülmüştür. Kognitif fonksiyonlarda düşüş anlamlı bulunmamıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

YILDIRIM, F., ŞİRİN, H., İŞKESEN, İ. (2022). Neurocognitive effects of cardiopulmonary bypass in coronary artery bypass surgery. Türk Göğüs Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Dergisi, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 4, 275–280. https://ajindex.com/articles/425144

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Rothenhausler HB, Grieser B, Nollert G, Reichart B, Schelling G, Kapfhammer HP. Psychiatric and psychosocial outcome of cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass: a prospective 12-month follow-up study. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2005;27:18-28
  2. Newman MF, Grocott HP, Mathew JP, White WD, Landolfo K, Reves JG, et al. Report of the substudy assessing the impact of neurocognitive function on quality of life 5 years after cardiac surgery. Stroke 2001;32:2874-81
  3. Duru F, Buchi S, Klaghofer R, Mattmann H, Sensky T, Buddeberg C, et al. How different from pacemaker patients are recipients of implantable cardioverter defibrillators with respect to psychosocial adaptation, affective disorders, and quality of life? Heart 2001;85:375-9
  4. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. “Mini-mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 1975;12:189-98
  5. Edmunds LH. Extracorporeal perfusion. In: Edmunds LH, editor. Cardiac surgery in the adult. New York: McGraw Hill; 1997. p. 255-94
  6. McGiffin DC, Kirklin JK. Cardiopulmonary bypass for cardiac surgery. In: Sabiston DC, Spencer FC, editors. Surgery of the chest. Vol. II, 6th ed. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders; 1995. p. 1256-71
  7. Arrowsmith JE, Grocott HP, Reves JG, Newman MF. Central nervous system complications of cardiac surgery. Br J Anaesth 2000;84:378-93
  8. Tuman KJ, McCarthy RJ, Najafi H, Ivankovich AD. Differential effects of advanced age on neurologic and cardiac risks of coronary artery operations. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1992;104:1510-7
  9. Bokesch PM. Brain injury and brain protection. In: Estafanous FG, Barash PG, Reves JG, editors. Cardiac anesthesia: principles and clinical practice. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2001. p. 465-75
  10. Stamou SC, Hill PC, Dangas G, Pfister AJ, Boyce SW, Dullum MK, et al. Stroke after coronary artery bypass: incidence, predictors, and clinical outcome. Stroke 2001;32:1508-13
  11. Redmond JM, Gillinov AM, Zehr KJ, Blue ME, Troncoso JC, Reitz BA, et al. Glutamate excitotoxicity: a mechanism of neurologic injury associated with hypothermic circulatory arrest. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1994;107:776-86
  12. Heijmeriks JA, Dassen W, Prenger K, Wellens HJ. The incidence and consequences of mental disturbances in elderly patients post cardiac surgery-a comparison with younger patients. Clin Cardiol 2000;23:540-6
  13. Kouchoukos NT, Blackstone EH, Doty DB, Hanley FL, Karp RB, editors. Postoperativ