Journals / Türk Göğüs Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Dergisi / 2011 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 2

Surgical treatment of postinfarction ventricular septal rupture

İnfarktüs sonrası ventriküler septal rüptürün cerrahi tedavisi

Pages
151–156
Publication Date
2022-09-02
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Preoperative pharmacological and IABP support has beneficial effects on decreasing mortality and morbidity.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background: In this study, we reported the results of 21 patients who were admitted to our clinic with ventricular septal rupture (VSR) that developed after myocardial infarction.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: Twenty-one patients (14 males, 7 females; mean age 59.6±8.8 years; range 52 to 73 years) who were admitted to our clinic with postinfarction VSR were retrospectively evaluated.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Preoperative pharmacological and IABP support has beneficial effects on decreasing mortality and morbidity.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background: In this study, we reported the results of 21 patients who were admitted to our clinic with ventricular septal rupture (VSR) that developed after myocardial infarction. Methods: Twenty-one patients (14 males, 7 females; mean age 59.6±8.8 years; range 52 to 73 years) who were admitted to our clinic with postinfarction VSR were retrospectively evaluated. All of these patients had complaints of angina pectoris and were diagnosed with coronary artery disease and VSR. Clinically unstable patients were operated on following stabilization with medical treatment with/or intraaortic balloon pump (IABP) support. In addition to mortality and morbidity, pre-, intra- and postoperative data were retrospectively recorded. After discharge patients were followed up in every three-month intervals.Results: Ventricular septal rupture was located anteriorly in 16 patients, and posteriorly in five patients. While nine patients underwent emergency surgery, the remaining 12 patients were operated on following establishment of hemodynamic stability. Eighty-one percent of the patients required IABP support before the operation, whereas 65% of them required inotropic support. Coronary artery bypass grafting and VSR patch repair with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) were performed on all patients. Perioperative mortality was seen in two patients. The mean cross-clamp time was 87.1±11.3 minutes and the mean CPB time was 138.6±19.9 minutes. During weaning off CPB, 100% of the patients required IABP support, 94% of the patients required inotropic support, and 29% of the patients required temporary pacemaker support. The mean intensive care unit duration was 6.2±4.4 days and the mean hospital duration was 13.0±5.6 days. Postoperative mortality was five patients, and mortality after discharge was two patients. Mean follow-up after discharge was 46.6±18.1 months.Conclusion: Nowadays, VSR caused by myocardial infarction is still a pathology with high mortality. Preoperative pharmacological and IABP support has beneficial effects on decreasing mortality and morbidity.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada son on yıllık dönemde miyokard infarktüsü sonrası ventriküler septal rüptür (VSR) nedeni ile kliniğimize başvuran 21 hastanın sonuçları bildirildi. Çalışma planı: Kliniğimize on yıllık dönem içinde infarktüs sonrası VSR nedeniyle başvuran 21 hasta (14 erkek, 7 kadın; ort. yaş 59.6±8.8 yıl; dağılım 52-73 yıl) geriye dönük olarak incelendi. Bu hastaların hepsi anjina pektoris (AP) yakınması ile başvuran ve koroner arter hastalığı ve VSR tanısı konulan hastalardı. Klinik olarak stabil olmayan hastalar intra-aortik balon pompası (İABP) destekli veya desteksiz medikal tedavi ile stabilize edildikten sonra ameliyata alındı. Mortalite ve morbiditeye ek olarak ameliyat öncesi, sırası ve sonrası veriler geriye dönük olarak kaydedildi. Taburcu sonrası hastalar üç aylık aralıklarla takip edildi.Bulgular: Ventriküler septal rüptür 16 hastada anteriyorda, beş hastada ise posteriyorda idi. Dokuz hasta acil koşullarda ameliyat edilirken diğer 12 hasta hemodinamik olarak stabilizasyonu takiben ameliyat edildi. Hastaların %81'inde ameliyat öncesi İABP desteğine, %65'inde ise inotrop desteğine gereksinim duyuldu. Bütün hastalara kardiyopulmoner bypass (KPB) eşliğinde koroner arter bypass greftleme ve yama ile VSR onarımı yapıldı. Ameliyat sırası mortalite iki hastada görüldü. Ortalama kross klemp zamanı 87.1±11.3 dakika, KPB zamanı ise 138.6±19.9 dakikaydı. Kardiyopulmoner bypasstan ayrılırken hastaların %100'ünde İABP desteğine, %94'ünde inotrop desteğine, %29'unda ise geçici pacemaker desteğine gereksinim duyuldu. Yoğun bakım ünitesinde ortalama kalış süresi 6.2±4.4 gün, ortalama hastanede kalış süresi ise 13.0±5.6 gündü. Ameliyat sonrası beş hasta, taburculuk sonrası takipte ise iki hasta kaybedildi. Hastaların taburcu sonrası ortalama takip süresi 46.6±18.1 ay idi.Sonuç: Miyokard infartüsü sonucu meydana gelen VSR günümüzde halen mortalitesi yüksek bir patolojidir. Ameliyat öncesinde farmakolojik destek ve İABP desteğinin mortalite ve morbiditenin azaltılmasında çok önemli bir rol oynar.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZÇINAR, E., HASDE, A. İ., AKAR, R., İNAN, M. B., SIRLAK, M., YAZICIOĞLU, L. (2022). Surgical treatment of postinfarction ventricular septal rupture. Türk Göğüs Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Dergisi, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 2, 151–156. https://ajindex.com/articles/424900

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Crenshaw BS, Granger CB, Birnbaum Y, Pieper KS, Morris DC, Kleiman NS, et al. Risk factors, angiographic patterns, and outcomes in patients with ventricular septal defect complicating acute myocardial infarction. GUSTO-1 (Global Utilization of Streptokinase and TPA for Occluded Coronary Arteries) Trial Investigators. Circulation 2000;101:27-32
  2. Topaz O, Taylor AL. Interventricular septal rupture complicating acute myocardial infarction: from pathophysiologic features to the role of invasive and noninvasive diagnostic modalities in current management. Am J Med 1992;93:683-8
  3. Maden JC, Daggett WM Jr. Postinfarction ventricular septal defect and free wall rupture. In: Edmunds LH Jr, editor. Cardiac surgery in adult. New York: McGrave-Hill; 1997. p. 1629-55
  4. Held AC, Cole PL, Lipton B, Gore JM, Antman EM, Hockman JS, et al. Rupture of the interventricular septum complicating acute myocardial infarction: a multicenter analysis of clinical findings and outcome. Am Heart J 1988;116:1330-6
  5. Lemery R, Smith HC, Giuliani ER, Gersh BJ. Prognosis in rupture of the ventricular septum after acute myocardial infarction and role of early surgical intervention. Am J Cardiol 1992;70:147-51
  6. Deja MA, Szostek J, Widenka K, Szafron B, Spyt TJ, Hickey MS, et al. Post infarction ventricular septal defect - can we do better? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2000;18:194-201
  7. Estrada-Quintero T, Uretsky BF, Murali S, Hardesty RL. Prolonged intraaortic balloon support for septal rupture after myocardial infarction. Ann Thorac Surg 1992;53:335-7
  8. Jones MT, Schofield PM, Dark JF, Moussalli H, Deiraniya AK, Lawson RA, et al. Surgical repair of acquired ventricular septal defect. Determinants of early and late outcome. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1987;93:680-6
  9. Cummings RG, Califf R, Jones RN, Reimer KA, Kong YH, Lowe JE. Correlates of survival in patients with postinfarction ventricular septal defect. Ann Thorac Surg 1989; 47:824-30
  10. Montoya A, McKeever L, Scanlon P, Sullivan HJ, Gunnar RM, Pifarré R. Early repair of ventricular septal rupture after infarction. Am J Cardiol 1980;45:345-8
  11. Cooley DA, Belmonte BA, Zeis LB, Schnur S. Surgical repair of ruptured interventricular septum following acute myocardial infarction. Surgery 1957;41:930-7
  12. Radford MJ, Johnson RA, Daggett WM Jr, Fallon JT, Buckley MJ, Gold HK, et al. Ventricular septal rupture: a review of clinical and physiologic features and an analysis of survival. Circulation 1981;64:545-53
  13. Daggett