Journals / Türk Göğüs Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Dergisi / 2011 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 2

Akciğer kanseri nedeniyle lobektomi yapılan hastaların altı ay sonraki yaşam kalitesinin değerlendirilmesi: Video-yardımlı torakoskopik cerrahiye karşı torakotomi

Quality of life assessment six months after lobectomy for lung cancer: video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery versus thoracotomy

Pages
207–212
Publication Date
2022-09-02
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Moreover, the results for chest pain, arm/shoulder pain and peripheral neuropathy scores were better preserved in the video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy group.Conclusion: This study shows that the patients who have undergone lobectomy by video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for non-small-cell lung carcinoma have better preserved quality of life scores than thoracotomy patients six months after the surgery with reduced postoperative pain in chest and peripheral neuropathy.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background: This study aims to assess the quality of life scores of patients who had undergone lobectomy by videoassisted thoracoscopic surgery.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: Both the “Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 (SF-36) Health Survey” and “European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30” with “lung cancer specific module LC-13”, the subtype of EORTC developed for lung cancer, were used to assess the health-related quality of life.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Moreover, the results for chest pain, arm/shoulder pain and peripheral neuropathy scores were better preserved in the video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy group.Conclusion: This study shows that the patients who have undergone lobectomy by video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for non-small-cell lung carcinoma have better preserved quality of life scores than thoracotomy patients six months after the surgery with reduced postoperative pain in chest and peripheral neuropathy.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background: This study aims to assess the quality of life scores of patients who had undergone lobectomy by videoassisted thoracoscopic surgery. Methods: Both the “Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 (SF-36) Health Survey” and “European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30” with “lung cancer specific module LC-13”, the subtype of EORTC developed for lung cancer, were used to assess the health-related quality of life. Two groups were created on a cross-sectional basis. The questionnaires were performed in both groups at the outpatient clinic follow-up six months after the surgery. Group 1 consisted of patients (n=18) with stage 1 nonsmall- cell lung carcinoma who had undergone lobectomy by video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery, while group 2 consisted of patients (n=20) at the same stage who had undergone lobectomy via thoracotomy.Results: There were no significant differences between the two groups in the preoperative patient characteristics. No local recurrence or distant metastasis was observed in any of the patients during the assessments who has completed the survey. Patients in group 1 had higher scores in physical functioning and emotional role in SF-36 questionnaire. Moreover, the results for chest pain, arm/shoulder pain and peripheral neuropathy scores were better preserved in the video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy group.Conclusion: This study shows that the patients who have undergone lobectomy by video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for non-small-cell lung carcinoma have better preserved quality of life scores than thoracotomy patients six months after the surgery with reduced postoperative pain in chest and peripheral neuropathy.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada video-yardımlı torakoskopik cerrahi ile lobektomi uygulanan hastalarda yaşam kalitesi skorları değerlendirildi. Çalışma planı: Sağlıkla ilişkili yaşam kalitesinin değerlendirilmesi amacıyla “Tıbbi Sonuçlar Çalışması Kısa Form 36 (SF-36) Sağlık Taraması” ve “Avrupa Kanser Araştırması ve Tedavisi Organizasyonu (EORTC) Yaşam Kalitesi Anketi-C30” ile bu formun akciğer kanseri için oluşturulmuş alt tipi “Akciğer Kanseri Spesifik Formu LC-13” kullanıldı. Kesitsel temele dayanılarak iki grup oluşturuldu. Anketler iki grupta da ameliyattan altı ay sonraki poliklinik kontrolünde uygulandı. Grup 1 (n=18) video-yardımlı torakoskopik lobektomi uygulanan evre 1 küçük hücreli dışı akciğer kanserli hastalardan oluşmakta iken, grup 2 (n=20) torakotomi ile lobektomi uygulanan aynı evredeki hastalardan oluşmakta idi.Bulgular: İki grup arasında ameliyat öncesi hasta karakteristikleri açısından anlamlı fark yok idi. Ölçümler sırasında anketi tamamlayan hastaların hiçbirinde lokal nüks veya uzak metastaz gözlenmedi. Grup 1'deki hastalar SF-36 anketinde daha yüksek fiziksel işlevsellik ve duygusal rol skorlarına sahip idi. Bunun yanında göğüs ağrısı, omuz ve kol ağrısı ile periferik nöropati sonuçlarının video-yardımlı torakoskopik lobektomi grubunda daha iyi korunduğu tespit edildi.Sonuç: Çalışmamız, video-yardımlı torakoskopik lobektomi ile ameliyat edilen küçük hücreli dışı akciğer kanserli hastalarda elde edilen yaşam kalitesi skorlarının ameliyattan altı ay sonra, azalmış ameliyat sonrası ağrısı ve periferik nöropati açısından torakotomi uygulanmış hastalara göre daha iyi sonuçlar elde edildiğini göstermiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

HALEZEROĞLU, S., DEMİRHAN, R., BAYSUNGUR, V., TEZEL, Ç., KUTLU, B., OKUR, E. (2022). Akciğer kanseri nedeniyle lobektomi yapılan hastaların altı ay sonraki yaşam kalitesinin değerlendirilmesi: Video-yardımlı torakoskopik cerrahiye karşı torakotomi. Türk Göğüs Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Dergisi, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 2, 207–212. https://ajindex.com/articles/424867

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Swanson SJ, Herndon JE 2nd, D’Amico TA, Demmy TL, McKenna RJ Jr, Green MR, et al. Video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy: report of CALGB 39802-a prospective, multi-institution feasibility study. J Clin Oncol 2007; 25:4993-7
  2. McKenna RJ Jr, Houck W, Fuller CB. Video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy: experience with 1,100 cases. Ann Thorac Surg 2006;81:421-5
  3. Kondo T, Sagawa M, Tanita T, Sato M, Ono S, Matsumura Y, et al. Is complete systematic nodal dissection by thoracoscopic surgery possible? A prospective trial of video-assisted lobectomy for cancer of the right lung. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1998;116:651-2
  4. Sagawa M, Sato M, Sakurada A, Matsumura Y, Endo C, Handa M, et al. A prospective trial of systematic nodal dissection for lung cancer by video-assisted thoracic surgery: can it be perfect? Ann Thorac Surg 2002;73:900-4
  5. Nomori H, Horio H, Naruke T, Suemasu K. What is the advantage of a thoracoscopic lobectomy over a limited thoracotomy procedure for lung cancer surgery? Ann Thorac Surg 2001;72:879-84
  6. Pinar R. Reliability and construct validity of the SF-36 in Turkish cancer patients. Qual Life Res 2005;14:259-64
  7. Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992;30:473-83
  8. Guzelant A, Goksel T, Ozkok S, Tasbakan S, Aysan T, Bottomley A. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: an examination into the cultural validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the EORTC QLQ-C30. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2004;13:135-44
  9. Cankurtaran ES, Ozalp E, Soygur H, Ozer S, Akbiyik DI, Bottomley A. Understanding the reliability and validity of the EORTC QLQ-C30 in Turkish cancer patients. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2008;17:98-104
  10. Fayers PM, Aaronson NK, Bjordal K, Groenvold M, Curran D, Bottomley A on behalf of the EORTC Quality of Life Group. EORTC QLQ-C30 Scoring Manual (3rd edition). Brussels: EORTC, 2001
  11. Hoang CD, Osborne MC, Maddaus MA. Return to work after thoracic surgery: an overlooked outcome measure in qualityof- life studies. Thorac Surg Clin 2004;14:409-16
  12. Maguire MF, Ravenscroft A, Beggs D, Duffy JP. A questionnaire study investigating the prevalence of the neuropathic component of chronic pain after thoracic surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2006;29:800-5
  13. Kirby TJ, Mack MJ, Landreneau RJ, Rice TW. Lobectomyvideo- assisted thoracic surgery versus muscle-sparing thoracotomy. A randomized