Journals / Türk Göğüs Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Dergisi / 2012 / Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 1

Angiographic findings in popliteal artery diseases

Popliteal arter hastalıklarında anjiyografik bulgular

Pages
56–64
Publication Date
2022-09-02
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Digital subtraction angiography is a valuable method in the diagnosis of popliteal artery disease and effective in determining the treatment method.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background: In this trial, we aimed to investigate the clinical features and treatment methods of popliteal artery diseases using digital subtraction angiographic findings.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: A total of 1263 popliteal arteries of 690 patients (566 males, 124 females; mean age 64 years; range 8 to 85 years) for whom all clinical data were available and who underwent lower extremity digital subtraction angiography in our department between February 2001 and November 2010 were investigated retrospectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Digital subtraction angiography is a valuable method in the diagnosis of popliteal artery disease and effective in determining the treatment method.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2001 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background: In this trial, we aimed to investigate the clinical features and treatment methods of popliteal artery diseases using digital subtraction angiographic findings. Methods: A total of 1263 popliteal arteries of 690 patients (566 males, 124 females; mean age 64 years; range 8 to 85 years) for whom all clinical data were available and who underwent lower extremity digital subtraction angiography in our department between February 2001 and November 2010 were investigated retrospectively. The diseases that affect popliteal arteries were classified as atherosclerosis, aneurysm, trauma, acute thromboembolism, popliteal entrapment syndrome, Buerger’s disease and other forms of vasculitis. The clinical symptoms and treatment methods of the patients were evaluated in the light of the above-mentioned findings. Results: Lesions were found in 731 arteries in the digital subtraction angiographic examination of 1263 arteries in total. Of these lesions 695 were atherosclerosis lesions, nine were aneurysms, 12 were traumas, two were acute thromboembolus, two were entrapment syndromes and 10 were Buerger’s disease lesions. Conclusion: Digital subtraction angiography is a valuable method in the diagnosis of popliteal artery disease and effective in determining the treatment method.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada popliteal arter hastalıklarının dijital çıkarmalı anjiyografi bulguları ortaya konularak, klinik özellikleri ve tedavi yöntemleri araştırıldı. Çalışma planı: Şubat 2001 - Kasım 2010 yılları arasında, bölümümüzde alt ekstremite dijital çıkarmalı anjiyografisi yapılan ve tüm verilerine ulaşılabilen 690 hastanın (566 erkek, 124 kadın; ort yaş 64 yıl; dağılım 8-85 yıl) toplam 1263 popliteal arteri retrospektif olarak incelendi. Popliteal arterleri etkileyen hastalıklar ateroskleroz, anevrizma, travma, akut tromboembolizm, popliteal tuzak sendromu, Burger hastalığı ve diğer vaskülitler olarak sınıflandırıldı. Hastaların klinik semptomları ve tedavi yöntemleri yukarıdaki bulgular doğrultusunda değerlendirildi. Bulgular: Toplam 1263 popliteal arterin dijital çıkarmalı anjiyografik incelemesinde 731 arterde lezyon saptandı. Bu lezyonların 695’i ateroskleroz lezyonları, dokuzu anevrizma, 12’si travma, ikisi akut tromboemboli, ikisi popliteal tuzak sendromu ve 11’i Buerger hastalığı lezyonu idi. Sonuç: Dijital çıkarmalı anjiyografi popliteal arter hastalıklarının tanısında değerli bir yöntemdir ve tedaviyi yönlendirmede etkilidir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇAKIR, Ö., YAVUZ, Ş., ÇİFTÇİ, E., SARISOY, H. T., GÜMÜŞTAŞ, S., İNAN, N., KANKO, M. (2022). Angiographic findings in popliteal artery diseases. Türk Göğüs Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Dergisi, Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 1, 56–64. https://ajindex.com/articles/424646

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Barut Ç, Sevinç Ö, Özden H, Cömert H, Esmer AF, Tekdemir İ, et al. Surgical anatomy and bifurcation patterns of the popliteal artery: an anatomical study. Turkiye Klinikleri J Med Sci 2009;29:338-43
  2. Kil SW, Jung GS. Anatomical variations of the popliteal artery and its tibial branches: analysis in 1242 extremities. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2009;32:233-40
  3. Diaz JA, Villegas M, Tamashiro G, Micelli MH, Enterrios D, Balestrini A, et al. Flexions of the popliteal artery: dynamic angiography. J Invasive Cardiol 2004;16:712-5
  4. Wang Y, Lee HM, Khilnani NM, Trost DW, Jagust MB, Winchester PA, et al. Bolus-chase MR digital subtraction angiography in the lower extremity. Radiology 1998;207:263-9
  5. Morasch MD, Collins J, Pereles FS, Carr JC, Eskandari MK, Pearce WH, et al. Lower extremity stepping-table magnetic resonance angiography with multilevel contrast timing and segmented contrast infusion. J Vasc Surg 2003;37:62-71
  6. Wright LB, Matchett WJ, Cruz CP, James CA, Culp WC, Eidt JF, et al. Popliteal artery disease: diagnosis and treatment. Radiographics 2004;24:467-79
  7. Holden A, Merrilees S, Mitchell N, Hill A. Magnetic resonance imaging of popliteal artery pathologies. Eur J Radiol 2008;67:159-68
  8. Beregi JP, Djabbari M, Desmoucelle F, Willoteaux S, Wattinne L, Louvegny S. Popliteal vascular disease: evaluation with spiral CT angiography. Radiology 1997;203:477-83
  9. Dousset V, Wehrli FW, Louie A, Listerud J. Popliteal artery hemodynamics: MR imaging-US correlation. Radiology 1991;179:437-41
  10. Pentecost MJ, Criqui MH, Dorros G, Goldstone J, Johnston KW, Martin EC, et al. Guidelines for peripheral percutaneous transluminal angioplasty of the abdominal aorta and lower extremity vessels. A statement for health professionals from a special writing group of the Councils on Cardiovascular Radiology, Arteriosclerosis, Cardio-Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Clinical Cardiology, and Epidemiology and Prevention, the American Heart Association. Circulation 1994;89:511-31
  11. Clark TW, Groffsky JL, Soulen MC. Predictors of long-term patency after femoropopliteal angioplasty: results from the STAR registry. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2001;12:923-33
  12. Grimm J, Müller-Hülsbeck S, Jahnke T, Hilbert C, Brossmann J, Heller M. Randomized study to compare PTA alone versus PTA with Palmaz stent placement for femoropopliteal lesions. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2001;12:935-42
  13. Johnston KW. Femoral and popliteal arteries: reanalysis of results of balloon angioplas