Journals / Türk Göğüs Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 2

A comparison of axillary blockage and local anesthesia techniques on autologous arteriovenous fistula flow rates and patient comfort in chronic hemodialysis patients

Kronik hemodiyaliz hastalarında aksiller blok ve lokal anestezi tekniklerinin otolog arteriyovenöz fistül akımı ve hasta konforu üzerine etkisinin karşılaştırılması

Pages
313–316
Publication Date
2022-09-02
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

There was one patient complicated with motor blockade on the same extremity, who spontaneously recovered after 24 hours in group 1.Conclusion: We conclude that axillary blockage is an effective and safe technique in AVF construction operations which has also a positive long-term effect on AVF flow rates without any critical complication.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background: In this article, we aim to compare the effects of axillary nerve block and local anesthesia techniques on the flow rate and patency of arteriovenous fistulas (AVF) and postoperative early-stage pain.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: This prospective study included 30 patients who were scheduled for brachial artery-cephalic vein AVF construction operation between the dates June 2007 and August 2009.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:There was one patient complicated with motor blockade on the same extremity, who spontaneously recovered after 24 hours in group 1.Conclusion: We conclude that axillary blockage is an effective and safe technique in AVF construction operations which has also a positive long-term effect on AVF flow rates without any critical complication.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2007 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background: In this article, we aim to compare the effects of axillary nerve block and local anesthesia techniques on the flow rate and patency of arteriovenous fistulas (AVF) and postoperative early-stage pain. Methods: This prospective study included 30 patients who were scheduled for brachial artery-cephalic vein AVF construction operation between the dates June 2007 and August 2009. Group 1 (n=15) consisted of axillary nerve block, group 2 (n=15) consisted of local anesthesia administered patients. The mean age of group 1 and group 2 patients were 57.8±14.0 and 54.9±16.5 respectively. There were two patients with hypertension history in both groups. Pain scores were evaluated with visual analog scale (VAS) (0-10 cm) at 2, 6th and 24th hour after the operation. Arteriovenous fistulas patency and flow rates were measured by Doppler ultrasonography (USG) at 10th months during follow-up.Results: Postoperative pain scores of 2, 6th and 24th hour in group 1 were 1.2±0.5, 2.8±0.7 and 1.9±0.4 respectively; the same values for group 2 were 3±1.3, 3±0.7 and 2±0.5 (p=0.000; p=0.480; p=0.497). The mean flow rates measured with Doppler USG after 10 months were 966.1±206.1 ml/min in group 1 and 871.6±338.3 ml/min in group 2 (p=0.513). All the AVF were patent in group 1 and group 2. Steal syndrome arised in three patients in group 2 and none in group 1 (p=0.68). There was one patient complicated with motor blockade on the same extremity, who spontaneously recovered after 24 hours in group 1.Conclusion: We conclude that axillary blockage is an effective and safe technique in AVF construction operations which has also a positive long-term effect on AVF flow rates without any critical complication.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada, aksiller sinir bloku ve lokal anestezi tekniklerinin arteriyovenöz fistül (AVF) akım hızı, açıklık oranları, ameliyat sonrası erken dönem ağrı üzerine etkileri karşılaştırıldı. Çalışma planı: Bu prospektif çalışmaya Haziran 2007 - Ağustos 2009 tarihleri arasında, brakiyal arter-sefalik ven AVF ameliyatı yapılması planlanan 30 hasta alındı. Grup 1 aksiller sinir bloku (n=15), grup 2 lokal anestezi uygulanan hastalardan (n=15) oluşuyordu. Grup 1 ve grup 2 hastaların yaş ortalaması, sırasıyla 57.8±14.0 ve 54.9±16.5 idi. Her iki grupta da hipertansiyon öyküsü olan iki hasta vardı. Hastaların ağrı skoru, görsel analog ölçeği (GAÖ) (0-10 cm) ile ameliyat sonrası 2, 6. ve 24. saatlerde değerlendirildi. Arteriyovenöz fistül açıklığı ve akım hızı, takip sırasında 10. ayda Doppler ultrasonografi (USG) ile değerlendirildi.Bulgular: Ameliyat sonrası 2, 6. ve 24. saatteki ağrı skorları ortalamaları grup 1’de sırasıyla 1.2±0.5, 2.8±0.7 ve 1.9±0.4 ve grup 2’de sırasıyla 3±1.3, 3±0.7 ve 2±0.5 (p=0.000; p=0.480; p=0.497) olarak saptandı. Ameliyat sonrası 10. ay kontrolünde grup 1’de Doppler USG ile saptanan ortalama akım hızı 966.1±206.1 ml/dk., grup 2’de 871.6±338.3 ml/dk. idi (p=0.513). Grup 1 ve grup 2’de tüm AVF’ler açıktı. Grup 2’de üç hastada çalma “steal” sendromu gelişirken grup 1’de herhangi bir komplikasyon saptanmadı (p=0.68). Grup 1’de bir hastada aynı ekstremitede 24 saat süren motor blok gelişti ve takiplerinde spontan olarak blok geri döndü.Sonuç: Arteriyovenöz fistül ameliyatları sırasında aksiller blokun, önemli bir komplikasyon olmadan gerçekleştirilebilecek etkili, güvenli ve AVF fistül akımını olumlu yönde ve uzun vadeli etkileyen bir anestezi yöntemi olduğu kanısındayız.

🔖

Cite This Article

KARA, İ., ALTINAY, L., UNCU, H., ACIPAYAM, M., HALICI, Ü., ZOR, M. H. (2022). A comparison of axillary blockage and local anesthesia techniques on autologous arteriovenous fistula flow rates and patient comfort in chronic hemodialysis patients. Türk Göğüs Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Dergisi, Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 2, 313–316. https://ajindex.com/articles/424588

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Alsalti RA, el-Dawlatly AA, al-Salman M, Jommaa S, Amro K, Dweiri MA, et al. Arteriovenous fistula in chronic renal failure patients: comparison between three different anesthetic techniques. Middle East J Anesthesiol 1999;15:305- 14
  2. Mouquet C, Bitker MO, Bailliart O, Rottembourg J, Clergue F, Montejo LS, et al. Anesthesia for creation of a forearm fistula in patients with endstage renal failure. Anesthesiology 1989;70:909-14
  3. Eldredge SJ, Sperry RJ, Johnson JO. Regional anesthesia for arteriovenous fistula creation in the forearm: a new approach. Anesthesiology 1992;77:1230-1
  4. Hingorani AP, Ascher E, Gupta P, Alam S, Marks N, Schutzer RW, et al. Regional anesthesia: preferred technique for venodilatation in the creation of upper extremity arteriovenous fistulae. Vascular 2006;14:23-6
  5. Rooijens PP, Burgmans JP, Yo TI, Hop WC, de Smet AA, van den Dorpel MA, et al. Autogenous radial-cephalic or prosthetic brachial-antecubital forearm loop AVF in patients with compromised vessels? A randomized, multicenter study of the patency of primary hemodialysis access. J Vasc Surg 2005;42:481-6
  6. Jennings WC. Creating arteriovenous fistulas in 132 consecutive patients: exploiting the proximal radial artery arteriovenous fistula: reliable, safe, and simple forearm and upper arm hemodialysis access. Arch Surg 2006;141:27-32
  7. Shemesh D, Zigelman C, Olsha O, Alberton J, Shapira J, Abramowitz H. Primary forearm arteriovenous fistula for hemodialysis access--an integrated approach to improve outcomes. Cardiovasc Surg 2003;11:35-41
  8. Crews JC, Weller RS, Moss J, James RL. Levobupivacaine for axillary brachial plexus block: a pharmacokinetic and clinical comparison in patients with normal renal function or renal disease. Anesth Analg 2002;95:219-23
  9. Alkış N. Periferik sinir blokları. In: Tulunay M, Çumruk H, editörler. Klinik anesteziyoloji. 3. baskı. Ankara: Güneş Kitapevi; 2004. s. 283-308
  10. Altay MA, Altay N, Ertürk C. Ön kol cerrahisinde aksiler blok uygulaması ve aksiller blokta bupivakain ile levobupivakainin etkinliğinin karşılaştırılması. Gaziantep Tıp Dergisi 2010;1:6-9
  11. Malinzak EB, Gan TJ. Regional anesthesia for vascular access surgery. Anesth Analg 2009;109:976-80. doi: 10.1213/ ane.0b013e3181adc208
  12. Shemesh D, Olsha O, Orkin D, Raveh D, Goldin I, Reichenstein Y, et al. Sympathectomy-like effects of brachial plexus block in arteriovenous access surgery. Ultrasound Med Biol 2006;32:817-22
  13. Ehsan O, Bhattacharya D, Darwish A,