Journals / Pamukkale Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 7

Application of response surface methodology for optimization of Co(II) adsorption conditions with natural pumice mineral

Doğal pomza minerali ile Co(II) adsorpsiyon koşullarının optimizasyonu için cevap yüzey yönteminin uygulanması

Pages
887–892
Publication Date
2017-12-27
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Then, the data obtained by the program were confirmed by experiments.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Cobalt (Co) is one of the most important heavy metals found in the wastewaters.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Response Surface Methodology (RSM) including the central composite design (CCD) was successfully applied to develop a response surface and optimize the medium conditions affecting significantly the adsorption such as pH, initial Co(II) concentration (Co) and temperature (T, °C).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Then, the data obtained by the program were confirmed by experiments.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Adsorpsiyon · Cevap yüzey yöntemi (CYY) · Kobalt

Abstract

Cobalt (Co) is one of the most important heavy metals found in the wastewaters. Some metals such as Co in wastewater from chemical-based industries can have toxic or harmful effects on life forms. Hence, removal of toxic metals in wastewater causing environmental hazards has a great importance. In this work, removal of Co(II) ions with adsorption from aqueous solutions by natural pumice has been investigated in a batch system. Response Surface Methodology (RSM) including the central composite design (CCD) was successfully applied to develop a response surface and optimize the medium conditions affecting significantly the adsorption such as pH, initial Co(II) concentration (Co) and temperature (T, °C). In CCD, optimum conditions were determined by the model equation obtained from the quadratic model fitting the experimental results. These optimum conditions were found to be 7.79, 69.84 mg/L and 20 °C for pH, Co and temperature, respectively. At these optimum conditions, the adsorption capacity and adsorption yield were calculated as 2.816 mg/g and 40.32%, respectively. Then, the data obtained by the program were confirmed by experiments.

Özet

Kobalt (Co) atık sularda bulunan en önemli ağır metallerden biridir. Kimyasal bazlı endüstrilerdeki atık sularda bulunan Co gibi bazı metaller yaşam biçimine toksik veya zararlı etkiye sahip olabilir. Bu nedenle çevresel tehlikeye neden olan atık sularda toksik metallerin giderilmesi önem arz etmektedir. Bu çalışmada; doğal pomza minerali ile sulu çözeltilerden Co(II) iyonunun adsorpsiyonla giderimi kesikli sistemde incelenmiştir. Merkezi kompozit tasarım (MKT) içeren cevap yüzey yöntemi (CYY) pH, başlangıç Co(II) konsantrasyonu (Co) ve sıcaklık (T, °C) gibi adsorpsiyonu etkileyen önemli ortam koşullarını optimize etmek ve modellemek için bir cevap yüzeyi geliştirmek amacıyla başarılı bir şekilde uygulanmıştır. MKT’de deneysel sonuçların uyduğu quadratik modelden elde edilen model eşitliği ile optimum koşullar belirlenmiştir. Bu optimum koşullar pH 7.79, Co 69.84 mg/L ve sıcaklık 20 °C olarak bulunmuştur. Bu optimum koşullarda adsorpsiyon kapasitesi 2.816 mg/g ve adsorpsiyon yüzdesi ise %40.32 olarak hesaplanmıştır. Daha sonra program tarafından elde edilen bu bilgiler deneylerle doğrulanmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞAHAN, T., YILMAZ, Ş. (2017). Application of response surface methodology for optimization of Co(II) adsorption conditions with natural pumice mineral. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 7, 887–892. https://ajindex.com/articles/42452

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Balkaya N, Cesur H. “Fosfojips kullanılarak kurşun giderimi”. Ekoloji Çevre Dergisi, 11(42), 27-29, 2002.
  2. Özcan AS. “Doğal bentonitin karakterizasyonu ve kurşun(II) iyonlarını adsorpsiyon yeteneği”. Balıkesir Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 12(2), 85-97, 2010. Şahan T. Atık Sularda Bulunan Bazı Ağır Metallerin Biyosorpsiyon ile Uzaklaştırılması ve Biyosorpsiyon Koşullarının Optimizasyonu. Doktora Tezi, Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi,
  3. Van, Türkiye, 2008.
  4. Al Abdullah J, Al Lafi AG, Al Masri W, Amin Y, Alnama T. “Adsorption of cesium, cobalt and lead onto a synthetic nano manganese oxide: behavior and mechanism”. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, 227, 240-254, 2016.
  5. Dewangan T, Tiwari A, Bajpai AK. “Removal of cobalt ıons from aqueous solution by adsorption onto cross-linked calcium alginate beads”. Journal of Dispersion Science and Technology, 30(1), 56-60, 2009.
  6. Hashemian S, Saffari H, Ragabion S. “Adsorption of cobalt(II) from aqueous solutions by Fe3O4/bentonite nanocomposite”. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, 226, 2211-2221, 2015.
  7. Kyzas GZ, Deliyanni EA, Matis KA. “Activated carbons produced by pyrolysis of waste potato peels: Cobaltions removal by adsorption”. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering, 490, 74-83, 2016.
  8. Parab H, Joshi S, Sudersanan M, Shenoy N, Lali A, Sarma U. “Removal and recovery of cobalt from aqueous solutions by adsorption using low cost lignocellulosic biomass-coir pith”. Journal of Environmental Science and Health Part A, 45(5), 603-611, 2010.
  9. Ramos SNC, Xavier ALP, Teodoro FS, Elias MC, Goncalves FJ, Gil LF, Freitas RP, Gurgel LVA. “Modeling mono- and multi-component adsorption of cobalt(II), copper(II), and nickel(II) metal ions from aqueous solution onto a new carboxylated sugarcane bagasse. Part I: Batch adsorption study”. Industrial Crops and Products, 74, 357-371, 2015.
  10. Zhang L, Wei J, Zhao X, Li F, Jiang F, Zhang M, Cheng X. “Competitive adsorption of strontium and cobalt onto tin antimonate”. Chemical Engineering Journal, 285, 679-689, 2016.
  11. Şahan T, Öztürk D. “Investigation of Pb(II) adsorption onto pumice samples: application of optimization method based on fractional factorial design and response surface methodology”. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 16(5), 819-831, 2014.
  12. Hwang S, Hansen CL. “Modeling and optimization in anaerobic bioconversion of complex substrates to acetic and butyric acids”. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 54(5), 451-460, 1997.
  13. Baei MS, Esfandian H, Nesheli AA. “Remov