Journals / Türk Göğüs Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 3

Atankalpte koroner arter baypas cerrahisindefentanil ve remifentanilin etkinlik karşılaştırması

Anefficacycomparison of fentanyl and remifentanil duringoff-pump remifentanilin etkinlik karşılaştırması

Pages
683–690
Publication Date
2022-09-02
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Although remifentanil infusion offers a better intraoperative hemodynamic stability and postoperative recovery, both agents have similar effects on myocardial injury during offpump CABG surgery.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background: This study aims to compare the effects of fentanyl and remifentanil on hemodynamic stability, release of troponin-I and early extubation during off-pump coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The remifentanil group received 1 μg/kg-1 remifentanil over one minute for induction, followed by 0.1-1 μg/kg-1 min-1 continuous infusion plus midazolam 0.1-0.15 mg/kg -1 for maintenance dose.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Although remifentanil infusion offers a better intraoperative hemodynamic stability and postoperative recovery, both agents have similar effects on myocardial injury during offpump CABG surgery.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background: This study aims to compare the effects of fentanyl and remifentanil on hemodynamic stability, release of troponin-I and early extubation during off-pump coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. Methods: Forty patients who were scheduled for elective offpump CABG surgery were randomly assigned to two groups. The remifentanil group received 1 μg/kg-1 remifentanil over one minute for induction, followed by 0.1-1 μg/kg-1 min-1 continuous infusion plus midazolam 0.1-0.15 mg/kg -1 for maintenance dose. The fentanyl group received 10-15 μg/kg-1 fentanyl over one minute for induction and 0.1-1 μg/kg-1 min-1 continuous infusion plus midazolam 0.1-0.15 mg/kg-1 for maintenance dose. Rocuronium bromide at 0.6-0.8 mg/kg -1 was administered to facilitate tracheal intubation. Midazolam infusion at 0.4-1 μg/kg-1 min-1 was initiated for maintenance therapy. Results: The depth of anesthesia was adjusted to maintain a BIS value between 40-60. Following skin incision and sternotomy, systolic arterial pressure was lower in the remifentanil group compared to the fentanyl group (115±14 mmHg vs. 130±22 mmHg p<0.05; 125±14 mmHg vs. 135±19 mmHg, p<0.05). Total dose of midazolam was significantly higher in the remifentanil group compared to the fentanyl group (13.9±3.7 mg vs. 11.6±3.7 mg, p<0.05). Intraoperative use of beta blockers, nitroglycerine and sodium nitroprusside was similar in both groups. The median time to extubation and the length of stay in the intensive care unit were shorter in the remifentanil group (6.5±3 h vs. 10±3 h, p<0.05; 14±6 h vs. 20±6 h, p<0.05). The incidence of postoperative electrocardiographic changes and troponin I measurements were similar in both groups. Conclusion: Although remifentanil infusion offers a better intraoperative hemodynamic stability and postoperative recovery, both agents have similar effects on myocardial injury during offpump CABG surgery.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada atan kalpte koroner arter baypas greft (KABG) cerrahisinde fentanil ve remifentanilin hemodinamik stabilite, ameliyat sırası troponin-I salınımı ve erken ekstübasyona etkileri karşılaştırıldı. Ça­l ış­ma pla­n ı: Atan kalpte elektif KABG cerrahisi planlanan 40 hasta randomize olarak iki gruba ayrıldı. Remifentanil grubuna indüksiyonda bir dakika boyunca 1 μg/kg-1 remifentanili takiben 0.1-1 μg/kg-1 dk.-1 sürekli infüzyon artı midazolam 0.1-0.15 mg/kg-1 idame dozu uygulandı. Fentanil grubuna indüksiyonda 10-15 μg/kg-1 fentanili takiben 0.1-1 μg/kg-1 dk.-1 sürekli infüzyon artı midazolam 0.1-0.15 mg/kg-1 idame dozu uygulandı. Trakeal entübasyonu kolaylaştırmak için rokuronyum bromür 0.6-0.8 mg/kg-1 verildi. İdame tedavisinde 0.4-1 μg/kg-1 dk.-1 mida- zolam infüzyonuna başlandı. Bul­gu­lar: Anestezi derinliği BIS 40-60 değerleri arasında olacak şekilde ayarlandı. Cilt insizyonu ve sternotomi sonrası sistolik arter basıncı remifentanil grubunda fentanil grubundan daha düşük bulundu (130±22 mmHgye kıyasla 115±14 mmHg, p<0.05; 135±19 mmHgye kıyasla 125±14 mmHg, p<0.05). Toplam midazolam dozu, remifentanil grubunda fentanil grubuna göre anlamlı olarak daha yüksekti (11.6±3.7 mgye kıyasla 13.9±3.7 mg, p<0.05). Ameliyat sırası beta bloker, nitrogliserin ve nitroprussid kullanımı her iki grupta benzerdi. Ortalama ekstübasyon zamanı ve yoğun bakımda kalış süresi, remifentanil grubunda daha kısaydı (10±3 saate kıyasa 6.5±3 saat, p<0.05; 20±6 saate kıyasla 14±6 saat, p<0.05). Ameliyat sonrası elektrokardiyografik değişiklik insidansı ve troponin-I ölçümleri iki grupta benzerdi. So­nuç: Atan kalpte KABG cerrahisinde remifentanil uygulaması daha iyi ameliyat sırası hemodinamik stabilite ve ameliyat sonrası derlenme sağlamasına karşılık, her iki ajanın miyokardiyal hasar üzerine etkileri benzer bulundu.

🔖

Cite This Article

BORAN, E., ÜNVER, S., AŞKIN, T., ERDEMLİ, Ö., KARADENİZ, Ü. (2022). Atankalpte koroner arter baypas cerrahisindefentanil ve remifentanilin etkinlik karşılaştırması. Türk Göğüs Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Dergisi, Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 3, 683–690. https://ajindex.com/articles/424465

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Tempe DK, Dutta D, Garg M, Minhas H, Tomar A, Virmani S. Myocardial protection with isoflurane during off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: a randomized trial. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2011;25:59-65. doi: 10.1053/j. jvca.2010.03.002
  2. Huffmyer J, Raphael J. The current status of off-pump coronary bypass surgery. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2011;24:64- 9. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0b013e328341ccf5
  3. Conzen PF, Fischer S, Detter C, Peter K. Sevoflurane provides greater protection of the myocardium than propofol in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery. Anesthesiology 2003;99:826-33
  4. Mangano DT, Siliciano D, Hollenberg M, Leung JM, Browner WS, Goehner P, et al. Postoperative myocardial ischemia. Therapeutic trials using intensive analgesia following surgery. The Study of Perioperative Ischemia (SPI) Research Group. Anesthesiology 1992;76:342-53
  5. Mangano DT. Perioperativecardiac morbidity. Anesthesiology 1990;72:153-84
  6. Lison S, Schill M, Conzen P. Fast-track cardiac anesthesia: efficacy and safety of remifentanil versus sufentanil. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2007;21:35-40
  7. Serfontein L. Awareness in cardiac anesthesia. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2010;23:103-8. doi: 10.1097/ ACO.0b013e328334cb75
  8. Mekis D, Kamenik M. A randomised controlled trial comparing remifentanil and fentanyl for induction of anaesthesia in CABG surgery. Wien Klin Wochenschr 2004;116:484-8
  9. Möllhoff T, Herregods L, Moerman A, Blake D, MacAdams C, Demeyere R, et al. Comparative efficacy and safety of remifentanil and fentanyl in ‘fast track’ coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a randomized, double-blind study. Br J Anaesth 2001;87:718-26
  10. Guignard B, Menigaux C, Dupont X, Fletcher D, Chauvin M. The effect of remifentanil on the bispectral index change and hemodynamic responses after orotracheal intubation. Anesth Analg 2000;90:161-7
  11. Marsh DF, Hodkinson B. Remifentanil in paediatric anaesthetic practice. Anaesthesia 2009;64:301-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2008.05731.x
  12. Shinohara K, Aono H, Unruh GK, Kindscher JD, Goto H. Suppressive effects of remifentanil on hemodynamics in baro-denervated rabbits. Can J Anaesth 2000;47:361-6
  13. Wang J, Winship S, Russell G. Induction of anaesthesia with sevoflurane and low-dose remifentanil: asystole following laryngoscopy. Br J Anaesth 1998;81:994-5
  14. Reitan JA, Stengert KB, Wymore ML, Martucci RW. Central vagal control of fentanyl-induced bradycardia during halothane anesthesia. Anesth Analg 1978;57