Journals / Türk Göğüs Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 4

A new modality in the treatment of deep vein thrombosis: catheter-directed ultrasound-accelerated thrombolysis

Derin ven trombozu tedavisinde yeni bir yöntem: Kateter aracılı ultrasonla hızlandırılmış tromboliz

Pages
755–760
Publication Date
2022-09-02
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Based on our findings, catheter-directed ultrasound- accelerated thrombolysis may be a safe and efficient treatment for deep vein thrombosis even in high-risk patient group.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background: This study aims to evaluate the post-intervention symptoms and ultrasonographic results of patients with deep vein thrombosis who were treated with catheter-directed ultrasound- accelerated thrombolysis.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: Forty-one patients (20 males, 21 females; mean age 63.9 years; range 19.9±21.9 years) who diagnosed with deep vein thrombosis between January 2012 and May 2013 were included in this study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Based on our findings, catheter-directed ultrasound- accelerated thrombolysis may be a safe and efficient treatment for deep vein thrombosis even in high-risk patient group.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2012 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background: This study aims to evaluate the post-intervention symptoms and ultrasonographic results of patients with deep vein thrombosis who were treated with catheter-directed ultrasound- accelerated thrombolysis. Methods: Forty-one patients (20 males, 21 females; mean age 63.9 years; range 19.9±21.9 years) who diagnosed with deep vein thrombosis between January 2012 and May 2013 were included in this study. Patients were divided into three groups as acute, subacute and chronic. Acute group included 15 patients (36.6%), subacute group included 21 patients (51.2%), and chronic group included five patients (12.2%). All cases were administered catheter-directed ultrasound-accelerated thrombolysis (EKOS®) in the thrombosed extremity via the popliteal vein under Doppler ultrasonography. Venography was applied and thrombus length was confirmed. After the intervention, patients were anticoagulated with warfarin, and given anti-embolism stockings. Patients' Doppler ultrasound results for pre-intervention, and one month, six months, and one year after intervention, symptom changes, and leg diameter differences were statistically evaluated. Results: Concomitant pulmonary embolism was detected in one patient. Statistically significant symptomatic improvement and reduced leg diameters were detected in patients in the acute and subacute groups. Symptomatic improvement and increased recanalization were detected in the chronic group patients. No mortality or hemorrhagic complication occurred during the course of treatment. Conclusion: Based on our findings, catheter-directed ultrasound- accelerated thrombolysis may be a safe and efficient treatment for deep vein thrombosis even in high-risk patient group.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada, kateter aracılı ultrasonla hızlandırılmış tromboliz ile tedavi edilen derin ven trombozlu hastaların işlem sonrası semptomları ve ultrasonografik sonuçları değerlendirildi.Ça­lış­ma­pla­nı:­Ocak 2012 - Mayıs 2013 tarihleri arasında derin ven trombozu tanısı olan toplam 41 hasta (20 erkek, 21 kadın; ort. yaş 63.9; dağılım 19.9±21.9 yıl) çalışmaya dahil edildi. Hastalar akut, subakut ve kronik olarak üç gruba ayrıldı. Akut grupta 15 hasta (%36.6), subakut grupta 21 hasta (%51.2) ve kronik grupta beş hasta (%12.2) vardı. Tüm olgularda tromboze ekstremitede Doppler ultrasonografi eşliğinde popliteal ven yoluyla kateter aracılı ultrasonla hızlandırılmış tromboliz (EKOS®) uygulandı. Venografi yapıldı ve trombüs boyu doğrulandı. Hastalar işlem sonrası varfarin ile antikoagüle edildi ve antiemboli çorabı verildi. Hastaların işlem öncesi ve işlem sonrası birinci ay, altıncı ay ve birinci yıl Doppler ultrason sonuçları, semptom değişimleri ve bacak çap farkları istatistiksel olarak değerlendirildi.Bul gu lar: Bir hastada eşlik eden pulmoner emboli saptandı. Akut ve subakut gruplarındaki hastalarda istatistiksel olarak anlamlı semptomatik düzelme ve bacak çaplarında azalma saptandı. Kronik gruptaki hastalarda semptomatik düzelme ve rekanalizasyon artışı saptandı. Tedavi süresince mortalite veya kanama komplikasyonu olmadı.So nuç: Bulgularımıza göre, kateter aracılı ultrasonla hızlandırılmış tromboliz derin ven trombozu için riskli hasta grubunda bile güvenilir ve etkin bir tedavi olabilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZALP, B., ÖZTÜRK, C., İPEKSOY, Ü., HALICI, Ü. (2022). A new modality in the treatment of deep vein thrombosis: catheter-directed ultrasound-accelerated thrombolysis. Türk Göğüs Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Dergisi, Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 4, 755–760. https://ajindex.com/articles/424453

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Metintaş M. Pulmoner Tromboemboli. Eskişehir:ASD Toraks Yayınları; 2002
  2. Lin PH, Ochoa LN, Duffy P. Catheter-directed thrombectomy and thrombolysis for symptomatic lower-extremity deep vein thrombosis: review of current interventional treatment strategies. Perspect Vasc Surg Endovasc Ther 2010;22:152-63
  3. Uğurlu B, Oto Ö, Kazaz H, Açıkel Ü, Hazan E, Dicle O. Derin ven trombozu tedavisinde sistemik trombolitik tedavi. Turk Gogus Kalp Dama 1999;7:251-6
  4. Badak Mİ, Kurtoğlu T, Özkısacık EA, Boğa M, Gürcün U, Sirek N, ve ark. Derin ven trombozunda standart heparin tedavisi sonuçlarımız. ADÜ Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi 2005;6:19-22
  5. Doomernik DE, Schrijver AM, Zeebregts CJ, de Vries JP, Reijnen MM. Advancements in catheter-directed ultrasoundaccelerated thrombolysis. J Endovasc Ther 2011;18:418-34
  6. Doğancı S, Erol G, Kaya E, Kadan M, Demirkılıç U. İliofemoral derin ven trombozunda ultrasonik kateter ile trombolitik tedavi deneyimi: Olgu sunumu. Damar Cer Derg 2012;21:192-6
  7. Enden T, Haig Y, Kløw NE, Slagsvold CE, Sandvik L, Ghanima W, et al. Long-term outcome after additional catheter-directed thrombolysis versus standard treatment for acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis (the CaVenT study): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2012;379:31-8
  8. Enden T, Kløw NE, Sandvik L, Slagsvold CE, Ghanima W, Hafsahl G, et al. Catheter-directed thrombolysis vs. anticoagulant therapy alone in deep vein thrombosis: results of an open randomized, controlled trial reporting on shortterm patency. J Thromb Haemost 2009;7:1268-75
  9. Schweizer J, Kirch W, Koch R, Elix H, Hellner G, Forkmann L, et al. Short- and long-term results after thrombolytic treatment of deep venous thrombosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;36:1336-43
  10. Semba CP, Dake MD. Iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis: aggressive therapy with catheter-directed thrombolysis. Radiology 1994;191:487-94
  11. Comerota AJ, Throm RC, Mathias SD, Haughton S, Mewissen M. Catheter-directed thrombolysis for iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis improves health-related quality of life. J Vasc Surg 2000;32:130-7
  12. Garcia Mark J. Aggresive treatment of chronic DVT with thrombolysis and mechanical clot removal: when is it indicated and does it work? Weith Symposium Session 31 Friday, Nov 19, 2010. Available from: http://www.veithsymposium.org/ viewsession2010.php?site=veith&sid=329