Journals / Türk Göğüs Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 4

Robotic lobectomy in lung cancer: early results

Akciğer kanserinde robotik lobektomi: Erken dönem sonuçlar

Pages
785–789
Publication Date
2022-09-02
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Robotic lobectomies in patients with lung cancer are technically feasible and oncological results seem promising, despite a limited number of patients.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background: This study aims to review the role of robotic system in minimal invasive lung cancer resections, its early oncological results, and further expectations.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: Between June 2010 and January 2013, the duration of surgery, length of hospital stay, complications, and pathological results of 11 patients who underwent robotic-assisted resection with the diagnosis of lung cancer in our clinic were retrospectively analyzed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Robotic lobectomies in patients with lung cancer are technically feasible and oncological results seem promising, despite a limited number of patients.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2010 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background: This study aims to review the role of robotic system in minimal invasive lung cancer resections, its early oncological results, and further expectations. Methods: Between June 2010 and January 2013, the duration of surgery, length of hospital stay, complications, and pathological results of 11 patients who underwent robotic-assisted resection with the diagnosis of lung cancer in our clinic were retrospectively analyzed. Results: Open surgery was not switched in any patient and all dissections were finished without rib spreaders. The mean operative time was 253 minutes. The mean number of dissected lymph node station was five in each patient. The only complication was prolonged air leak in one patient. No procedure-related mortality was observed. The mean hospital stay was 6.1 days. Pathological examination showed an adenocarcinoma predominance as the most common tumor type in this patient group (n=9). Tumor size was ranging between 1.8-4.5 cm. The mean number of dissected lymph nodes was 16 in each patient. Conclusion: Robotic lobectomies in patients with lung cancer are technically feasible and oncological results seem promising, despite a limited number of patients.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada robotik sistemin minimal invaziv akciğer kanseri rezeksiyonlardaki yeri, erken dönem onkolojik sonuçları ve geleceğe dair beklentilerin gözden geçirilmesi amaçlandı.Ça­lış­ma­pla­nı:­Haziran 2010 - Ocak 2013 tarihleri arasında kliniğimizde akciğer kanseri tanısı ile robotik yardımlı rezeksiyon yapılan 11 hastanın ameliyat süreleri, hastanede kalış süreleri, komplikasyonları ve patolojik sonuçları geriye dönük olarak değerlendirildi.Bul gu lar: Hiçbir hastada açık cerrahiye geçilmedi ve tüm diseksiyonlar ekartör koyulmadan tamamlanabildi. Ortalama ameliyat süresi 253 dakika idi. Her hastadan diseke edilen lenf nodu istasyonu sayısı en az beş idi. Tek komplikasyon bir hastada gelişen uzamış hava kaçağı idi. İşleme bağlı mortalite görülmedi. Ortalama hastane kalış süresi 6.1 gün idi. Patolojik inceleme sonucunda bu hasta grubunda en sık görülen tümör tipi adenokarsinom idi (n=9). Tümör çapları 1.8-4.5 cm arasında değişmekte idi. Her hastadan ortalama 16 lenf nodu çıkarıldı.So nuç: Akciğer kanserli hastalarda robotik lobektomiler, teknik olarak rahatlıkla uygulanabilmekte ve sınırlı hasta sayısına rağmen onkolojik sonuçları umut vaat etmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

TANJU, S., DİLEGE, M. Ş., ÖZTÜRK, E., BAYRAK, Y. (2022). Robotic lobectomy in lung cancer: early results. Türk Göğüs Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Dergisi, Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 4, 785–789. https://ajindex.com/articles/424399

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Barbash GI, Glied SA. New technology and health care costs--the case of robot-assisted surgery. N Engl J Med 2010;363:701-4
  2. Cerfolio RJ, Bryant AS, Minnich DJ. Starting a robotic program in general thoracic surgery: why, how, and lessons learned. Ann Thorac Surg 2011;91:1729-36
  3. Melfi FM, Menconi GF, Mariani AM, Angeletti CA. Early experience with robotic technology for thoracoscopic surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2002;21:864-8
  4. Melfi FM, Davini F, Fanucchi O. Robotic lobectomy. In: Inderbitzi RGC, Schmid RA, Melfi FM, Casula RP, editors. Minimally Invasive Thoracic and Cardiac Surgery. Berlin: Heidelberg: Springer; 2012. p. 145-55
  5. Ninan M, Dylewski MR. Total port-access robot-assisted pulmonary lobectomy without utility thoracotomy. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2010;38:231-2
  6. Gharagozloo F, Margolis M, Tempesta B, Strother E, Najam F. Robot-assisted lobectomy for early-stage lung cancer: report of 100 consecutive cases. Ann Thorac Surg 2009;88:380-4
  7. Augustin F, Bodner J, Wykypiel H, Schwinghammer C, Schmid T. Initial experience with robotic lung lobectomy: report of two different approaches. Surg Endosc 2011;25:108-13
  8. Dylewski MR, Ohaeto AC, Pereira JF. Pulmonary resection using a total endoscopic robotic video-assisted approach. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2011;23:36-42
  9. Bayrak Y, Dilege Ş. Erken evre akciğer kanserinde robotik lobektomi. Turk Gogus Kalp Dama 2013;21:229-31
  10. Kirby TJ, Mack MJ, Landreneau RJ, Rice TW. Lobectomy- -video-assisted thoracic surgery versus muscle-sparing thoracotomy. A randomized trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1995;109:997-1001
  11. Whitson BA, Groth SS, Duval SJ, Swanson SJ, Maddaus MA. Surgery for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review of the video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery versus thoracotomy approaches to lobectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 2008;86:2008-16
  12. Giulianotti PC, Buchs NC, Caravaglios G, Bianco FM. Robot-assisted lung resection: outcomes and technical details. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2010;11:388-92.