Journals / Türk Göğüs Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 3

Learning and improvement process of video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy: experiences of Süreyyapaşa

Video-yardımlı torakoskopik lobektomi öğrenme ve gelişim süreci: Süreyyapaşa deneyimi

Pages
589–595
Publication Date
2022-09-02
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: We believe that our study results would offer some clues on the patient selection to incipient surgeons for this procedure.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background: This study aims to evaluate the results of video- assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy (VATS lobectomy).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: A total of 86 patients (59 males, 27 females; mean age 55.2±15.9; range 15 to 80 years) who underwent VATS lobectomy due to several reasons and were switched to thoracotomy at Süreyyapaşa Thoracic and Cardiovascular Diseases Education and Research Hospital between January 2006 and September 2012 were retrospectively analyzed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: We believe that our study results would offer some clues on the patient selection to incipient surgeons for this procedure.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2006 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background: This study aims to evaluate the results of video- assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy (VATS lobectomy). Methods: A total of 86 patients (59 males, 27 females; mean age 55.2±15.9; range 15 to 80 years) who underwent VATS lobectomy due to several reasons and were switched to thoracotomy at Süreyyapaşa Thoracic and Cardiovascular Diseases Education and Research Hospital between January 2006 and September 2012 were retrospectively analyzed. Results: Based on the preoperative assessment, the success rate of surgery significantly lower in male patients and those with previous history of tuberculosis who underwent VATS lobectomy and were switched to thoracotomy (p=0.006, p=0.033, respectively). Surgery was often able to be performed via three ports. The most frequently reported reasons for switching thoracotomy were adhesions and incomplete fissure. According to the localization of tumors, the success rate for VATS lobectomy was lower for the upper lobes. The drainage quantity and duration for surgery were more advantages in the middle and lower lobes. Conclusion: We believe that our study results would offer some clues on the patient selection to incipient surgeons for this procedure.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada video-yardımlı torakoskopik lobektomi (VATS lobektomi) sonuçları değerlendirildi.Ça­lış­ma­pla­nı:­Ocak 2006 - Eylül 2012 tarihleri arasında Süreyyapaşa Göğüs ve Kalp Damar Hastalıkları Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesinde çeşitli nedenlerle VATS lobektomi yapılan ve torakotomiye dönülen toplam 86 hastanın (59 erkek, 27 kadın; ort. yaş 55.2±15.9 yıl; dağılım 15-80 yıl) klinik kayıtları retrospektif olarak incelendi.Bul gu lar: Ameliyat öncesi yapılan değerlendirmeye göre, VATS lobektomi yapılan ve torakotomiye dönülen erkek hastalarda ve tüberküloz öyküsü olanlarda ameliyatın başarısı anlamlı düzeyde düşük bulundu (sırasıyla p=0.006, p=0.033). Ameliyatlar genellikle üç port ile yapıldı. En sık bildirilen torakotomiye dönülme nedenleri yapışıklıklar ve inkomplet fissür idi. Tümör yerleşim yerine göre değerlendirildiğinde, VATS lobektominin başarı oranı üst loblar için daha düşük bulundu.Drenaj miktarı ve ameliyat süresi açısından ise, orta lob ve alt lob daha avantajlı bulundu.So nuç: Çalışma sonuçlarımızın VATS lobektomiye yeni başlayacak cerrahlara hasta seçimi konusunda birtakım ipuçları sağlayacağı görüşündeyiz.

🔖

Cite This Article

BAYSUNGUR, V., YALÇINKAYA, İ., TEZEL, Ç., KUTLU, C. A., ALPAY, L., COŞGUN, T., OKUR, E. (2022). Learning and improvement process of video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy: experiences of Süreyyapaşa. Türk Göğüs Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Dergisi, Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 3, 589–595. https://ajindex.com/articles/424277

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Günlüoğlu MZ. Akciğer kanseri'nde VATS uygulamaları. 2010 J Clin Anal Med. Avaliable from: http://www.jcam. com.tr/files/KATD-346.pdf. html 2. Demmy TL, Curtis JJ. Minimally invasive lobectomy directed toward frail and high-risk patients: a case-control study. Ann Thorac Surg 1999;68:194-200. 3. Demmy TL, Nwogu C. Is video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy better? Quality of life considerations. Ann Thorac Surg 2008;85:S719-28. 4. Schuchert MJ, Pettiford BL, Pennathur A, Abbas G, Awais O, Close J, et al. Anatomic segmentectomy for stage I nonsmall-cell lung cancer: comparison of video-assisted thoracic surgery versus open approach. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2009;138:1318-25. 5. Baysungur V, Tezel Ç, Okur E, Demirhan R, Kutlu B, Halezeroğlu S. Quality of life assessment six month safter lobectomy for lung cancer: video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery versus thoracotomy. Turk Gogus Kalp Dama 2011;19:207-12. 6. Belgers EH, Siebenga J, Bosch AM, van Haren EH, Bollen EC. Complete video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy and its learning curve. A single center study introducing the technique in The Netherlands. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2010;10:176-80. 7. Sugiura H, Morikawa T, Kaji M, Sasamura Y, Kondo S, Katoh H. Long-term benefits for the quality of life after video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy in patients with lung cancer. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 1999;9:403-8. 8. Toker A. Kaya S. Akciğer kanserinde VATS ile lobektomi. Turk Gogus Kalp Dama 2009;17:139-43. 9. McKenna RJ Jr, Houck WV. New approaches to the minimally invasive treatment of lung cancer. Curr Opin Pulm Med 2005;11:282-6. 10. Petersen RH, Hansen HJ. Learning thoracoscopic lobectomy. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2010;37:516-20. 11. McKenna RJ. Video assisted thoracoscopic surgery. In: Lewis LI, McKenna RJ, editors. Medical Management of the Thoracic Surgery Patients. Philedelphia: Saunders Elsevier; 2010. p. 78-86. 12. McKenna RJ Jr. Complications and learning curves for video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy. Thorac Surg Clin 2008;18:275-80. 13. McKenna RJ Jr, Wolf RK, Brenner M, Fischel RJ, Wurnig P. Is lobectomy by video-assisted thoracic surgery an adequate cancer operation? Ann Thorac Surg 1998;66:1903-8. 14. McKenna RJ Jr, Houck W, Fuller CB. Video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy: experience with 1,100 cases. Ann Thorac Surg 2006;81:421-5.