SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türk Göğüs Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 4

Aortoiliyak tıkayıcı hastalık revaskülarizasyonunda paramedian retroperitoneal yaklaşım

Paramedian retroperitoneal approach for revascularization of aortoiliac occlusive disease

Fırat DURNA
Serkan GİRGİN
Mohammed ALSHALALDEH
Bilgin EMRECAN
Pages
672–677
Publication Date
2022-09-02
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Based on our experience, the retroperitonealaortoiliac approach with a paramedian incision has fewcomplications and reasonable outcomes.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background: This study aims to examine unilateral andbilateral revascularization of aortoiliac occlusive diseasevia paramedian incision and retroperitoneal approach.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: Between January 2005 and December 2012, 74patients (67 males, 7 females; mean age 61.6±9.5 years;range 24 to 79 years) underwent surgical revascularizationfor aortoiliac occlusive disease via paramedian incisionand retroperitoneal approach [aortofemoral bypass (n=40),iliofemoral bypass (n=14), aortoiliac bypass (n=2) andaortobifemoral bypass (18)].
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Based on our experience, the retroperitonealaortoiliac approach with a paramedian incision has fewcomplications and reasonable outcomes.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2005 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background: This study aims to examine unilateral andbilateral revascularization of aortoiliac occlusive diseasevia paramedian incision and retroperitoneal approach. Methods: Between January 2005 and December 2012, 74patients (67 males, 7 females; mean age 61.6±9.5 years;range 24 to 79 years) underwent surgical revascularizationfor aortoiliac occlusive disease via paramedian incisionand retroperitoneal approach [aortofemoral bypass (n=40),iliofemoral bypass (n=14), aortoiliac bypass (n=2) andaortobifemoral bypass (18)]. Data of the patients forunilateral aortoiliac revascularization were comparedwith those for bilateral aortoiliac revascularization. Thepreoperative characteristics and perioperative data of thepatients were analyzed. Results: Three patients (3.9%) died postoperatively due tomyocardial infarction and pulmonary complications. Nointraoperative complications occurred. Six patients requiredsubsequent reoperation: two for acute distal embolism tothe contralateral limb, two for distal anastomosis leakage,and two for local distal wound infection. These patientswere successfully treated. The patients were dischargedfrom the hospital on antiplatelet therapy. There was nosignificant difference in the length of intensive care unitstay, time to oral intake, preoperative and postoperativehemoglobin levels, hematocrit levels, creatinin levels, andneed for transfusion between the unilateral and bilateralrevascularization patients. Conclusion: Based on our experience, the retroperitonealaortoiliac approach with a paramedian incision has fewcomplications and reasonable outcomes.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada paramedian insizyon veretroperitoneal yaklaşım ile aortoiliyak tıkayıcı hastalığıntek taraflı ve iki taraflı revaskülarizasyonu incelendi. Ça­lış­ma­pla­nı:­Ocak 2005 - Aralık 2012 tarihleri arasında74 hastaya (67 erkek, 7 kadın; ort. yaş 61.6±9.5 yıl;dağılım 24-79 yıl) aortoiliyak tıkayıcı hastalık nedeniyleparamedian insizyon ve retroperitoneal yaklaşım ilecerrahi revaskülarizasyon [aortofemoral baypas (n=40),iliyofemoral baypas (n=14), aortoiliyak baypas (n=2)ve aortobifemoral baypas (n=18)] yapıldı. Tek taraflıaortoiliyak revaskülarizasyon yapılan hastaların verileri,iki taraflı aortoiliyak revaskülarizasyon yapılan hastalarile karşılaştırıldı. Hastaların ameliyat öncesi özellikleri veameliyat sırası verileri incelendi. Bul gu lar: Üç hasta (%3.9) miyokard enfarktüsü ve pulmonerkomplikasyonlar nedeniyle ameliyat sonrası kaybedildi.Ameliyat sırası komplikasyon gözlenmedi. Takiben altıhastaya yeniden cerrahi yapıldı: iki hastaya karşı tarafekstremiteye akut distal emboli, iki hastaya distal anastomozkaçağı ve iki hastaya da lokal distal yara yeri enfeksiyonunedeniyle. Bu hastalar başarılı bir şekilde tedavi edildi.Hastalar antitrombosit tedavisi ile hastaneden taburcu edildi.Yoğun bakımda kalma süresi, oral gıdaya kadar geçenzaman, ameliyat öncesi ve ameliyat sonrası hemoglobindüzeyleri, hematokrit düzeyleri, kreatinin düzeyleri vetransfüzyon ihtiyaçları açısından tek taraflı ve iki taraflırevaskülarizasyon hastalarında anlamlı bir fark bulunmadı. So nuç: Deneyimlerimize göre, paramedian insizyonile retroperitoneal aortoiliyak yaklaşımın az sayıdakomplikasyonu ve kabul edilebilir sonuçları vardır.

🔖

Cite This Article

DURNA, F., GİRGİN, S., ALSHALALDEH, M., EMRECAN, B. (2022). Aortoiliyak tıkayıcı hastalık revaskülarizasyonunda paramedian retroperitoneal yaklaşım. Türk Göğüs Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Dergisi, Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 4, 672–677. https://ajindex.com/articles/424214

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Yamada M, Maruta K, Shiojiri Y, Takeuchi S, Matsuo Y, Takaba T. Atrophy of the abdominal wall muscles after extraperitoneal approach to the aorta. J Vasc Surg 2003;38:346-53
  2. Patnaik VVG, Singla RK, Bansal VK. Surgical incisions their anatomical basis Part IV-Abdomen. J Anat Soc India 2001;50:170-8
  3. Darling C, Shah DM, Chang BB, Paty PS, Leather RP. Current status of the use of retroperitoneal approach for reconstructions of the aorta and its branches. Ann Surg 1996;224:501-6
  4. Colacchio G, Tomescot A, de Loubresse CG, Coggia M. Single anterior retroperitoneal approach for bilateral exposure of iliac arteries. J Vasc Surg 2009;50:203-5
  5. Di Centa I, Coggia M, Cerceau P, Javerliat I, Alfonsi P, Beauchet A, et al. Total laparoscopic aortobifemoral bypass: short- and middle-term results. Ann Vasc Surg 2008;22:227-32
  6. Lin JC, Kolvenbach R, Schwierz E, Wassiljew S. Total laparoscopic aortofemoral bypass as a routine procedure for the treatment of aortoiliac occlusive disease. Vascular 2005;13:80-3
  7. Coggia M, Javerliat I, Di Centa I, Colacchio G, Leschi JP, Kitzis M, et al. Total laparoscopic bypass for aortoiliac occlusive lesions: 93-case experience. J Vasc Surg 2004;40:899-906
  8. Norgren L, Hiatt WR, Dormandy JA, Nehler MR, Harris KA, Fowkes FG. Inter-Society Consensus for the Management of Peripheral Arterial Disease (TASC II). Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2007;33:1-75
  9. Cambria RP, Brewster DC, Abbott WM, Freehan M, Megerman J, LaMuraglia G, et al. Transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal approach for aortic reconstruction: a randomized prospective study. J Vasc Surg 1990;11:314-24
  10. Brewster DC. Current controversies in the management of aortoiliac occlusive disease. J Vasc Surg 1997;25:365-79
  11. Connolly JE, Price T. Aortoiliac endarterectomy: a lost art? Ann Vasc Surg 2006;20:56-62
  12. Frisch N, Bour P, Berg P, Fiévé G, Frisch R. Long-term results of thrombectomy for late occlusions of aortofemoral bypass. Ann Vasc Surg 1991;5:16-20
  13. Delaney CP, Zutshi M, Senagore AJ, Remzi FH, Hammel J, Fazio VW. Prospective, randomized, controlled trial between a pathway of controlled rehabilitation with early ambulation and diet and traditional postoperative care after laparotomy and intestinal resection. Dis Colon Rectum 2003;46:851-9.