Journals / Türk Göğüs Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 4

Akut komplike tip B aort diseksiyonunun endovasküler tamiri aortun yeniden biçimlenmesini etkiler mi?

Does endovascular repair affect aortic remodeling in acute complicated type B aortic dissection?

Pages
665–671
Publication Date
2022-09-02
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Endovascular repair of type B aortic dissectionmay positively affect aortic remodeling in chronic settings andmay prevent possible aorta-related complications during long- term follow-up.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background: This study aims to analyze the volume changesof true and false lumens at a late stage in patients undergoingthoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) due to acutecomplicated type B aortic dissection.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: Between March 2006 and November 2012, 18consecutive patients (14 males, 4 females; mean age was 61.9±11years; range 39 to 77 years) who underwent TEVAR for acutecomplicated type B aortic dissection in our clinic were included inthis study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Endovascular repair of type B aortic dissectionmay positively affect aortic remodeling in chronic settings andmay prevent possible aorta-related complications during long- term follow-up.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2006 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background: This study aims to analyze the volume changesof true and false lumens at a late stage in patients undergoingthoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) due to acutecomplicated type B aortic dissection. Methods: Between March 2006 and November 2012, 18consecutive patients (14 males, 4 females; mean age was 61.9±11years; range 39 to 77 years) who underwent TEVAR for acutecomplicated type B aortic dissection in our clinic were included inthis study. Computed tomography scans obtained at the final visitwere used for the volume analysis of true and false lumens. Themedian follow-up was 35.3 (range, 12 to 84) months. Indicationsfor intervention were rupture or malperfusion in 17 patients(both in some patients) and persistent chest pain in one patient.The stent-graft part of the descending thoracic aorta (DTA) wasdefined as Segment 1, DTA without stent-graft (supraceliac) asSegment 2, and the abdominal aorta as Segment 3. Results: In segment 1, the mean volume of true lumen increasedfrom 74.4±49 mL to 110±50 mL (p=0.0145), while the meanvolume of false lumen decreased from 124.2±81 mL to 59.5±59mL (p<0.00001). In segment 2, the mean volume of true lumenincreased from 23.1±28 mL to 40.5±33 mL (p=0.0015), whilethe mean volume of false lumen decreased from 32.8±29 mLto 29±1 mL (p=0.624). In segment 3, the mean volume of truelumen increased from 46.5±63 mL to 57.3±74 mL (p=0.0388),the mean volume of false lumen decreased from 41.8±30 mLto 37.6±32 mL (p=0.5195). True and false lumens volumechanges were statistically significant except volume decreasein segment 3. Conclusion: Endovascular repair of type B aortic dissectionmay positively affect aortic remodeling in chronic settings andmay prevent possible aorta-related complications during long- term follow-up.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada, akut komplike tip B aort diseksiyonunedeniyle torasik endovasküler aort tamiri (TEVAR) uygulananhastalarda, uzun dönemdeki gerçek ve yalancı lümenlerinhacim değişiklikleri araştırıldı. Ça­lış­ma­pla­nı:­Mart 2003 - Kasım 2012 tarihleri arasındakliniğimizde akut komplike tip B aort diseksiyonu nedeniyleTEVAR uygulanan 18 ardışık hasta (14 erkek, 4 kadın; ort.yaş 61.9±11 yıl; dağılım 39-77 yıl) çalışmaya dahil edildi. Sonvizitte elde edilen bilgisayarlı tomografi taramaları, gerçekve yalancı lümen hacimlerini ölçmek için kullanıldı. Ortancatakip süresi 35.3 (dağılım 12-84) ay idi. Girişim endikasyonu17 hastada rüptür veya malperfüzyon (bazı hastalarda her ikisibirlikte), bir hastada ise inatçı göğüs ağrısı idi. İnen torasikaortun (DTA) stentli kısmı Segment 1, DTAnın stentsiz olankısmı (supraçölyak) Segment 2 ve abdominal aort Segment 3olarak tanımlandı. Bul gu lar: Segment 1de ortalama gerçek lümen hacmi74.4±49 mLden 110±50 mLye yükselirken (p=0.0145),ortalama yalancı lümen hacmi 124.2±81 mLden 59.5±59 mLyedüştü (p<0.00001). Segment 2de, ortalama gerçek lümenhacmi 23.1±28 mLden 40.5±33 mLye yükselirken (p=0.0015),ortalama yalancı lümen hacminin 32.8±29 mLden 29±1 mLyedüştü (p=0.624). Segment 3te ise ortalama gerçek lümenhacmi 46.5±63 mLden 57.3±74 mLye yükselirken(p=0.0388), ortalama yalancı lümen hacminin 41.8±30 mLden37.6±32 mLye düştü (p=0.5195). Gerçek ve yalancı lümendekivolüm değişiklikleri, segment 3deki volüm azalması dışındaistatistiksel olarak anlamlı bulunmuştur. So nuç: Tip B aort diseksiyonunun endovasküler tamirikronik hastalıklarda aortun yeniden biçimlenmesiniolumlu etkileyebilir ve uzun dönem takipte muhtemel aortkomplikasyonlarını önleyebilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

PARILDAR, M., CELAL, Ç., BOZKAYA, H., POSACIOĞLU, H., ERTUGAY, S. (2022). Akut komplike tip B aort diseksiyonunun endovasküler tamiri aortun yeniden biçimlenmesini etkiler mi?. Türk Göğüs Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Dergisi, Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 4, 665–671. https://ajindex.com/articles/424213

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Estrera AL, Miller CC, Safi HJ, Goodrick JS, Keyhani A, Porat EE, et al. Outcomes of medical management of acute type B aortic dissection. Circulation 2006;114:384-9
  2. Fattori R, Cao P, De Rango P, Czerny M, Evangelista A, Nienaber C, et al. Interdisciplinary expert consensus document on management of type B aortic dissection. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013;61:1661-78
  3. Duson SM, Crawford RS. The role of endografts in the management of type B aortic dissections. Perspect Vasc Surg Endovasc Ther 2012;24:177-83
  4. Conrad MF, Crawford RS, Kwolek CJ, Brewster DC, Brady TJ, Cambria RP. Aortic remodeling after endovascular repair of acute complicated type B aortic dissection. J Vasc Surg 2009;50:510-7
  5. Rodriguez-Lopez JA, Diethrich EB. Diameter or volume? The measure of success after endovascular repair of thoracic aortic dissections. J Endovasc Ther 2009;16:39-41
  6. Song TK, Donayre CE, Walot I, Kopchok GE, Litwinski RA, Lippmann M, et al. Endograft exclusion of acute and chronic descending thoracic aortic dissections. J Vasc Surg 2006;43:247-58
  7. Rodriguez JA, Olsen DM, Lucas L, Wheatley G, Ramaiah V, Diethrich EB. Aortic remodeling after endografting of thoracoabdominal aortic dissection. J Vasc Surg 2008;47:1188-94
  8. Schoder M, Czerny M, Cejna M, Rand T, Stadler A, Sodeck GH, et al. Endovascular repair of acute type B aortic dissection: long-term follow-up of true and false lumen diameter changes. Ann Thorac Surg 2007;83:1059-66
  9. Kim KM, Donayre CE, Reynolds TS, Kopchok GE, Walot I, Chauvapun JP, et al. Aortic remodeling, volumetric analysis, and clinical outcomes of endoluminal exclusion of acute complicated type B thoracic aortic dissections. J Vasc Surg 2011;54:316-24
  10. Andacheh ID, Donayre C, Othman F, Walot I, Kopchok G, White R. Patient outcomes and thoracic aortic volume and morphologic changes following thoracic endovascular aortic repair in patients with complicated chronic type B aortic dissection. J Vasc Surg 2012;56:644-50
  11. Walker PJ, Dake MD, Mitchell RS, Miller DC. The use of endovascular techniques for the treatment of complications of aortic dissection. J Vasc Surg 1993;18:1042-51
  12. Nienaber CA, Rousseau H, Eggebrecht H, Kische S, Fattori R, Rehders TC, et al. Randomized comparison of strategies for type B aortic dissection: the INvestigation of STEnt Grafts in Aortic Dissection (INSTEAD) trial. Circulation 2009;120:2519-28
  13. Brunkwall J, Lammer J, Verhoeven E, Taylor P. ADSORB: a study on the efficacy of endovascular