SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türk Göğüs Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 2

Konvansiyonel stentli biyoprotez kapaklara kıyasla dikişsiz aort kapaklarının erken dönem sonuçları

Early outcomes of the sutureless aortic valves versus conventional stented bioprosthetic valves

Muhammet Onur HANEDAN
Mehmet Ali YÜRÜK
Ali Kemal ARSLAN
Murat YÜCEL
İlker MATARACI
Tanıl ÖZER
Ufuk SAYAR
Pages
240–247
Publication Date
2022-09-02
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

No in-hospital mortality was seen in the sutureless group; however, five patients in the stented group died during the hospital stay (p=0.054).Conclusion: Sutureless aortic valve replacement is a novel surgical treatment modality, yielding excellent hemodynamic conditions with a short ischemic time.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background: In this study, we compared the early outcomes of sutureless aortic valves versus conventional stented bioprosthetic valves.Methods: Between October 2009 and May 2014, 46 patients (22 males, 24 females; mean age 74.74±7.35 years; range 56 to 87 years) were included.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The patients were divided into two groups including 25 patients with conventional stented bioprosthetic valves in group 1 and 21 patients with sutureless aortic valves in group 2.Results: The maximum postoperative aortic gradient was 20.1±5.5 mmHg for the sutureless group and 28.7±13.9 mmHg for the stented group (p=0.038).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:No in-hospital mortality was seen in the sutureless group; however, five patients in the stented group died during the hospital stay (p=0.054).Conclusion: Sutureless aortic valve replacement is a novel surgical treatment modality, yielding excellent hemodynamic conditions with a short ischemic time.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2009 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background: In this study, we compared the early outcomes of sutureless aortic valves versus conventional stented bioprosthetic valves.Methods: Between October 2009 and May 2014, 46 patients (22 males, 24 females; mean age 74.74±7.35 years; range 56 to 87 years) were included. The patients were divided into two groups including 25 patients with conventional stented bioprosthetic valves in group 1 and 21 patients with sutureless aortic valves in group 2.Results: The maximum postoperative aortic gradient was 20.1±5.5 mmHg for the sutureless group and 28.7±13.9 mmHg for the stented group (p=0.038). The mean postoperative gradient was 10.3±3.4 mmHg for the sutureless group and 15.1±8.4 mmHg for the stented group (p=0.052). No in-hospital mortality was seen in the sutureless group; however, five patients in the stented group died during the hospital stay (p=0.054).Conclusion: Sutureless aortic valve replacement is a novel surgical treatment modality, yielding excellent hemodynamic conditions with a short ischemic time.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada, konvansiyonel stentli biyoprotez kapaklara kıyasla, dikişsiz aort kapakların erken dönem sonuçları karşılaştırıldı.Ça lış ma pla nı: Ekim 2009 - Mayıs 2014 tarihleri arasında 46 hasta (22 erkek, 24 kadın; ort. yaş 74.74±7.35 yıl; dağılım 56 to 87 yıl) çalışmaya dahil edildi. Grup 1'de konvansiyonel stentli biyoprotez kapak ile 25 hasta ve grup 2'de dikişsiz aort kapağı ile 21 hasta olmak üzere, hastalar iki gruba ayrıldı.Bul gu lar: Ameliyat sonrası maksimum aortik gradyan dikişsiz grupta 20.1±5.5 mmHg ve stentli grupta 28.7±13.9 mmHg idi (p=0.038). Ameliyat sonrası ortalama gradyan dikişsiz grupta 10.3±3.4 mmHg ve stentli grupta 15.1±8.4 mmHg idi (p=0.052). Dikişsiz grupta hastane mortalitesi gözlenmedi; ancak stentli grupta hastane yatışı sırasında beş hasta kaybedildi (p=0.054).So nuç: Dikişsiz aort kapak replasmanı, kısa iskemi süresi ile mükemmel hemodinamik koşullar sağlayan, yeni bir cerrahi tedavi yöntemidir.

🔖

Cite This Article

HANEDAN, M. O., YÜRÜK, M. A., ARSLAN, A. K., YÜCEL, M., MATARACI, İ., ÖZER, T., SAYAR, U. (2022). Konvansiyonel stentli biyoprotez kapaklara kıyasla dikişsiz aort kapaklarının erken dönem sonuçları. Türk Göğüs Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Dergisi, Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 2, 240–247. https://ajindex.com/articles/424134

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Santarpino G, Pfeiffer S, Schmidt J, Concistrè G, Fischlein T. Sutureless aortic valve replacement: first-year single-center experience. Ann Thorac Surg 2012;94:504-8.
  2. Eichstaedt HC, Easo J, Härle T, Dapunt OE. Early single- center experience in sutureless aortic valve implantation in 120 patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2014;147:370-5.
  3. Altintas G, Diken AI, Hanedan O, Yurdakok O, Ozyalcin S, Kucuker SA, et al. The Sorin Freedom SOLO stentless tissue valve: early outcomes after aortic valve replacement. Tex Heart Inst J 2013;40:50-5.
  4. Zahn R, Gerckens U, Grube E, Linke A, Sievert H, Eggebrecht H, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: first results from a multi-centre real-world registry. Eur Heart J 2011;32:198-204.
  5. Breitenbach I, Wimmer-Greinecker G, Bockeria LA, Sadowski J, Schmitz C, Kapelak B, et al. Sutureless aortic valve replacement with the Trilogy Aortic Valve System: multicenter experience. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010;140:878-84.
  6. Di Eusanio M, Fortuna D, De Palma R, Dell'Amore A, Lamarra M, Contini GA, et al. Aortic valve replacement: results and predictors of mortality from a contemporary series of 2256 patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2011;141:940-7.
  7. St Rammos K, Ketikoglou DG, Koullias GJ, Tsomkopoulos SG, Rammos CK, Argyrakis NP. The Nicks-Nunez posterior enlargement in the small aortic annulus: immediate- intermediate results. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2006;5:749-53.
  8. Dhareshwar J, Sundt TM, Dearani JA, Schaff HV, Cook DJ, Orszulak TA. Aortic root enlargement: what are the operative risks? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2007;134:916-24.
  9. Kohl P, Wijns W, Danchin N, Di Mario C, Falk V, Folliguet T, et al. Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2010;38:1-52.
  10. Martens S, Sadowski J, Eckstein FS, Bartus K, Kapelak B, Sievers HH, et al. Clinical experience with the ATS 3f Enable® Sutureless Bioprosthesis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2011;40:749-55.
  11. Borger MA, Carson SM, Ivanov J, Rao V, Scully HE, Feindel CM, et al. Stentless aortic valves are hemodynamically superior to stented valves during mid- term follow-up: a large retrospective study. Ann Thorac Surg 2005;80:2180-5.
  12. Minh TH, Mazine A, Bouhout I, El-Hamamsy I, Carrier M, Bouchard D, et al. Expanding the indication for sutureless aortic valve replacement to patients with mitral disease. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2014;148:1354-9.
  13. Folliguet TA, Laborde F, Zannis K, Ghorayeb G, Haverich A, Shrestha M. Sutureless perceval aortic valve replacement: results of t