Journals / Türk Göğüs Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 2

Kardiyolojik ve kardiyovasküler cerrahi girişim yapılan hastalarda manyetik rezonans görüntülemenin güvenirliği

The reliability of magnetic resonance imaging in patients undergoing cardiologic and cardiovascular surgical interventions

Pages
383–391
Publication Date
2022-09-02
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Herein, we describe a practical source of information and guidance on the reliability of magnetic resonance imaging in this patient population in the clinical practice in the light of evidence-based data.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Magnetic resonance imaging is an invaluable diagnostic tool which is increasingly more frequently used in clinical practice.
📊
Key Findings & Data:However, the utility of this imaging technique may be limited in patients with metallic implants placed during previous cardiologic or cardiovascular surgical interventions due to increased complication rates.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Herein, we describe a practical source of information and guidance on the reliability of magnetic resonance imaging in this patient population in the clinical practice in the light of evidence-based data.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Magnetic resonance imaging is an invaluable diagnostic tool which is increasingly more frequently used in clinical practice. However, the utility of this imaging technique may be limited in patients with metallic implants placed during previous cardiologic or cardiovascular surgical interventions due to increased complication rates. Despite increased rates of compatibility between such devices and magnetic resonance imaging thanks to technological advances, the risk of interaction with untoward consequences is still high in many cases. Herein, we describe a practical source of information and guidance on the reliability of magnetic resonance imaging in this patient population in the clinical practice in the light of evidence-based data.

Özet

Manyetik rezonans görüntüleme klinik uygulamada giderek daha sık kullanılan değerli bir tanı aracıdır. Ancak, bu görüntüleme tekniğinin kullanımı, komplikasyon oranını artırdığı için, daha önceki kardiyolojik veya kardiyovasküler cerrahi girişimler sırasında metalik implant takılan hastalarda sınırlı olabilir. Teknolojik gelişmeler sayesinde bu tür cihazlar ve manyetik rezonans görüntüleme arasındaki geçimlilik oranı artmakla birlikte, beklenmedik sonuçlar ile birlikte etkileşim riski halen birçok olguda yüksektir. Bu yazıda, kanıta dayalı veriler eşliğinde, bu hasta popülasyonunda klinik uygulamada manyetik rezonans görüntülemenin güvenirliğine ilişkin pratik bir bilgi kaynağı ve rehber sunuldu.

🔖

Cite This Article

YALÇINKAYA, A., YILMAZ, S., SARAK, T., ÇAMKIRAN, V., ÇAĞLI, K., DİKEN, A. İ. (2022). Kardiyolojik ve kardiyovasküler cerrahi girişim yapılan hastalarda manyetik rezonans görüntülemenin güvenirliği. Türk Göğüs Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Dergisi, Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 2, 383–391. https://ajindex.com/articles/424075

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Roguin A, Schwitter J, Vahlhaus C, Lombardi M, Brugada J, Vardas P, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging in individuals with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices. Europace 2008;10:336-46.
  2. Götte MJ, Rüssel IK, de Roest GJ, Germans T, Veldkamp RF, Knaapen P, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging, pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: current situation and clinical perspective. Neth Heart J 2010;18:31-7.
  3. Tzifa A, Krombach GA, Krämer N, Krüger S, Schütte A, von Walter M, et al. Magnetic resonance-guided cardiac interventions using magnetic resonance-compatible devices: a preclinical study and first-in-man congenital interventions. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2010;3:585-92.
  4. Roguin A, Goldsher D. Magnetic resonance imaging and implantable cardiac electronic devices: it's not what we can do, it's what we should do. Isr Med Assoc J 2010;12:436-8.
  5. Kalin R, Stanton MS. Current clinical issues for MRI scanning of pacemaker and defibrillator patients. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2005;28:326-8.
  6. Kanal E, Borgstede JP, Barkovich AJ, Bell C, Bradley WG, Etheridge S, et al. American College of Radiology White Paper on MR Safety: 2004 update and revisions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004;182:1111-4.
  7. Faris OP, Shein M. Food and Drug Administration perspective: Magnetic resonance imaging of pacemaker and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator patients. Circulation 2006;114:1232-3.
  8. Levine GN, Gomes AS, Arai AE, Bluemke DA, Flamm SD, Kanal E, et al. Safety of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiovascular devices: an American Heart Association scientific statement from the Committee on Diagnostic and Interventional Cardiac Catheterization, Council on Clinical Cardiology, and the Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention: endorsed by the American College of Cardiology Foundation, the North American Society for Cardiac Imaging, and the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. Circulation 2007;116:2878-91.
  9. Martin ET, Coman JA, Shellock FG, Pulling CC, Fair R, Jenkins K. Magnetic resonance imaging and cardiac pacemaker safety at 1.5-Tesla. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;43:1315-24.
  10. Nazarian S, Roguin A, Zviman MM, Lardo AC, Dickfeld TL, Calkins H, et al. Clinical utility and safety of a protocol for noncardiac and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging of patients with permanent pacemakers and implantable- cardioverter defibrillators at 1.5 tesla. Circulation 2006;114:1277-84.
  11. Sommer T, Naehle CP, Yang A, Zeijlemaker V, Hackenbroch M, Schmiedel A, et al. Str