Journals / Türk Göğüs Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 1

Popliteal arter tuzak sendromu deneyimlerimiz

Our experiences with popliteal artery entrapment syndrome

Pages
56–60
Publication Date
2022-09-02
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

There was no in-hospital mortality.Conclusion: Our study results suggest that popliteal artery entrapment syndrome should be kept in mind in young patients with complaint of claudication and a detailed vascular examination is of utmost importance for the differential diagnosis and treatment plan in this patient population

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, we aimed to present our experiences on patients undergoing surgery for popliteal artery entrapment syndrome.Methods: Between March 2007 and June 2010, 12 patients (9 males, 3 females; mean age 23.4±6.6 years; range 16 to 40 years) who underwent surgery for popliteal artery entrapment syndrome in our clinic were retrospectively analyzed.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Of all patients, eight had type 2 disease, while the remaining patients had type 3 disease.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:There was no in-hospital mortality.Conclusion: Our study results suggest that popliteal artery entrapment syndrome should be kept in mind in young patients with complaint of claudication and a detailed vascular examination is of utmost importance for the differential diagnosis and treatment plan in this patient population
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2007 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study, we aimed to present our experiences on patients undergoing surgery for popliteal artery entrapment syndrome.Methods: Between March 2007 and June 2010, 12 patients (9 males, 3 females; mean age 23.4±6.6 years; range 16 to 40 years) who underwent surgery for popliteal artery entrapment syndrome in our clinic were retrospectively analyzed. Eleven patients had unilateral and one patient had bilateral popliteal artery entrapment syndrome. Of all patients, eight had type 2 disease, while the remaining patients had type 3 disease. Physical examination revealed non-palpable pulses. The Ankle-Brachial indices of the affected extremity varied between 0.30 to 0.46. The diagnosis was based on magnetic resonance angiography or computed tomography angiography.Results: The flow of distal popliteal artery was evaluated by the manual Doppler ultrasonography and pulsatile flow was detected. Postoperative ankle-brachial indices of patients were measured between 0.90 to 0.97 values in all patients. The patients were scheduled for the outpatient clinic at one and three months after discharge for magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography angiography examinations. The results were normal, which indicated that femoro-popliteal artery bypass grafts were patent and popliteal artery lumens at the thrombectomy sites were open. Ischemic ulcers were completely healed. There was no in-hospital mortality.Conclusion: Our study results suggest that popliteal artery entrapment syndrome should be kept in mind in young patients with complaint of claudication and a detailed vascular examination is of utmost importance for the differential diagnosis and treatment plan in this patient population

Özet

Bu çalışmada, popliteal arter tuzak sendromu nedeniyle ameliyat edilen hastalara ilişkin deneyimlerimiz sunuldu.Ça­lış­ma­ pla­nı:­ Mart 2007 - Haziran 2010 tarihleri arasında kliniğimizde popliteal arter tuzak sendromu nedeniyle ameliyat edilen 12 hasta (9 erkek, 3 kadın; ort. yaş 23.4±6.6 yıl; dağılım 16-40 yıl) retrospektif olarak incelendi. On bir hastada tek taraflı ve bir hastada iki taraflı popliteal arter tuzak sendromu vardı. Hastaların sekizinde tip 2 hastalık var iken, geri kalan hastalarda tip 3 hastalık vardı. Fizik muayenede nabızları alınamıyordu. Hastalıktan etkilenen ekstremitede ölçülen ayak bileği brakiyel indeksi 0.30 ile 0.46 arasında değişiyordu. Tanı, manyetik rezonans anjiyografi veya bilgisayarlı tomografi anjiyografi ile kondu.Bul gu lar: Manuel Doppler ultrasonografi ile popliteal arterin distalindeki akım değerlendirildi ve pulsatil akım tespit edildi. Tüm hastalarda ameliyat sonrası ayak bileği-kol indeksi 0.90 ile 0.97 arasında ölçüldü. Hastalar taburcu sonrasında birinci ve üçüncü ayda manyetik rezonans görüntüleme veya bilgisayarlı tomografi anjiyografi muayeneleri için polikliniğe çağrıldı. Sonuçlar normaldi; femoropopliteal arter baypas greftleri açıktı ve popliteal arterin trombektomi yapılan lümenleri açıktı. İskemik ülser tamamen iyileşti. Hastane mortalitesi gözlenmedi.So nuç: Çalışma bulgularımız, kladikasyon yakınması olan genç hastalarda popliteal arter tuzak sendromunun göz önünde bulundurulması gerektiğini ve bu hasta nüfusunda ayrıntılı vasküler muayenenin ayırıcı tanı ve tedavi planlaması açısından çok önemli olduğunu göstermektedir

🔖

Cite This Article

DAĞ, Ö., ARSLAN, Ü., ERKUT, B., YILDIZ, Z., TORT, M., HALICI, Ü., KAYĞIN, M. A., LİMANDAL, H. K. (2022). Popliteal arter tuzak sendromu deneyimlerimiz. Türk Göğüs Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Dergisi, Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 1, 56–60. https://ajindex.com/articles/424042

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Gencpinar T, Albayrak G, Gulcu A, Catalyurek H. A case report on popliteal entrapment syndrome of a child. CausaPedia 2013;2:503-8.
  2. Ohta M, Kusaba A, Shrestha DR, Koja K, Kina M, Shiroma H, et al. Popliteal artery entrapment syndrome. Report of two cases. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 1991;32:697-701.
  3. Gumustas S, Çakir O, Ciftci E, Yavuz S, Kanko M, Sarisoy HT, et al. Angiographic findings in popliteal artery diseases. Turk Gogus Kalp Dama 2012;20:56-64.
  4. Gibson MH, Mills JG, Johnson GE, Downs AR. Popliteal entrapment syndrome. Ann Surg 1977;185:341-8.
  5. Almeida MJ, Yoshida WB, Melo NR. Popliteal artery entrapment syndrome. Rev Port Cir Cardiotorac Vasc 2003;10:199-206. [Abstract] Papaioannou S, Tsitouridis K, Giataganas G, Rodokalakis G, Kyriakou V, Papastergiou Ch, et al. Evaluation of popliteal arteries with CT angiography in popliteal artery entrapment syndrome. Hippokratia 2009;13:32-7.
  6. Sirasanagandla SR, Potu BK, Nayak B S, Bhat KMR. Popliteal vessels entrapment by a variant accessory belly of medial head of gastrocnemius. Anatom Physiol 2013;3:116. Roche-Nagle G, Wong KT, Oreopoulos G. Vascular claudication in a young patient: popliteal entrapment syndrome. Hong Kong Med J 2009;15:388-90.
  7. Yavas D, Uzun Z, Ozcan F. Popliteal entrapment syndrome. GKD Cer Derg 1992;1:207-10.
  8. Iwaki R, Ozaki N, Tanaka Y, Wakita N. Bilateral popliteal artery entrapment syndrome with asynchronous onset. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2011;13:429-31.
  9. Al-Basheer M, Hadadin F, Al Zoubi O, Quaran Z. Familial popliteal entrapment syndrome: a case report. JRMS 2003;10:63-5.
  10. Murray A, Halliday M, Croft RJ. Popliteal artery entrapment syndrome. Br J Surg 1991;78:1414-9.
  11. Collins PS, McDonald PT, Lim RC. Popliteal artery entrapment: an evolving syndrome. J Vasc Surg 1989;10:484-9.
  12. Sinha S, Houghton J, Holt PJ, Thompson MM, Loftus IM, Hinchliffe RJ. Popliteal entrapment syndrome. J Vasc Surg 2012;55:252-262.
  13. Aslim E, Akay HT, Korun O, Akgün RC. Type 2 popliteal artery entrapment syndrome: a case report. Turk Gogus Kalp Dama 2012;20:910-2.
  14. Schweizer M, Hügli R, Koella C, Jeanneret C. Popliteal entrapment syndrome and age. Vasa 2012;41:262-8.
  15. De Oliveira FM, Santos ACB, Takito AM, Bolanho E, da Costa RF, Fernandes N. Bilateral popliteal artery entrapment syndrome: case report. J Vasc Bras 2008;2:159-62.
  16. Tercan F, Oğuzkurt L, Kizilkiliç O, Yeniocak A, Gülcan O. Popliteal artery entrapment syndrome. Diagn Interv Radiol 2005;11:222-4.
  17. Mark LK, Kiselow MC, Wagner M, Goodman JJ. Popliteal artery