Journals / Türk Göğüs Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 1

Popliteal arter tuzak sendromu disiplinlerarası bir yaklaşım gerektirir

Popliteal artery entrapment syndrome needs an interdisciplinary approach

Pages
61–67
Publication Date
2022-09-02
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Overall primary graft patency rates at one and five years were 91.3% and 82.6%, respectively.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, we report our long-term experiences of popliteal artery entrapment syndrome and to highlight the importance of an interdisciplinary approach.Methods: Between January 1994 and December 2014, popliteal artery entrapment syndrome was diagnosed in a total of 23 limbs of 21 patients (17 males, 4 females; mean age 26.14 years; range 17 to 35 years).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Interposition vein graft from the saphenous vein was performed on the patients with type 1 and 2 popliteal artery entrapment syndrome.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Overall primary graft patency rates at one and five years were 91.3% and 82.6%, respectively.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2014 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study, we report our long-term experiences of popliteal artery entrapment syndrome and to highlight the importance of an interdisciplinary approach.Methods: Between January 1994 and December 2014, popliteal artery entrapment syndrome was diagnosed in a total of 23 limbs of 21 patients (17 males, 4 females; mean age 26.14 years; range 17 to 35 years). All patients underwent surgical decompression of the popliteal artery. Interposition vein graft from the saphenous vein was performed on the patients with type 1 and 2 popliteal artery entrapment syndrome. Interpositional vein grafting after musculotendinous resection of the medial head of gastrocnemius muscle was carried out in the patients with type 3, 4, and 6 popliteal artery entrapment syndrome.Results: The mean follow-up was 120.5±59.0 (range, 38 to 218) months. Re-exploration was required in two limbs. Overall primary graft patency rates at one and five years were 91.3% and 82.6%, respectively. Initially, the vast majority of the patients were admitted to cardiovascular surgery outpatient clinics; however, eight patients applied to the other outpatient clinics and were subsequently consulted.Conclusion: Early and accurate diagnosis should be settled for the patients with popliteal artery entrapment syndrome to ensure an appropriate management as soon as possible. Therefore, the referral of the patients with lower extremity claudication to various outpatient clinics from different specialties should alert the treating physician for popliteal artery entrapment syndrome, even in unusual presentations

Özet

Bu çalışmada popliteal arter tuzak sendromuna ilişkin uzun dönem deneyimlerimiz bildirildi ve disiplinlerarası yaklaşımın önemi vurgulandı.Ça­lış­ma­pla­nı:­Ocak 1994 - Aralık 2014 tarihleri arasında 21 hastanın (17 erkek, 4 kadın; ort. yaş 26.14 yıl; dağılım 17-35 yıl) toplam 23 ekstremitesine popliteal arter tuzak sendromu tanısı konuldu. Tüm hastalara popliteal arterin cerrahi dekompresyonu uygulandı. Tip 1 ve 2 popliteal arter tuzak sendromlu hastalara safen ven ile ven greft interpozisyonu yapıldı. Tip 3, 4 ve 6 popliteal arter tuzak sendromlu hastalara gastroknemius kası medial başının kas ve tendon rezeksiyonundan sonra ven greft interpozisyonu uygulandı.Bul gu lar: Ortalama takip süresi 120.5±59.0 ay idi. İki ekstremiteye yeniden girişim uygulanması gerekti. Genel greft açıklık oranları birinci ve beşinci yılda sırasıyla %91.3 ve %82.6 idi. Hastaların büyük bir çoğunluğu başlangıçta kalp damar cerrahisi kliniğine başvurdu; ancak sekiz hasta diğer polikliniklere başvurdu ve takiben konsülte edildi.So nuç: Popliteal arter tuzak sendromlu hastalara uygun tedavinin kısa sürede sağlanabilmesi için erken ve doğru tanı konulmalıdır. Bu nedenle, farklı branşların çeşitli polikliniklerine alt ekstremite kladikasyonu ile başvuran hastaları tedavi eden hekim, olağandışı klinik seyir olsa dahi, popliteal arter tuzak sendromu açısından dikkatli olmalıdır

🔖

Cite This Article

GÖK, E., DEMİR, T., KAYIRAN, O., ŞAHİN, M., ELEVLİ, M. G. (2022). Popliteal arter tuzak sendromu disiplinlerarası bir yaklaşım gerektirir. Türk Göğüs Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Dergisi, Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 1, 61–67. https://ajindex.com/articles/424026

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Stuart TP. Note on a Variation in the Course of the Popliteal Artery. J Anat Physiol 1879;13:162. McAree BJ, O'Donnell ME, Davison GW, Boyd C, Lee B, Soong CV. Bilateral popliteal artery occlusion in a competitive bike rider: case report and clinical review. Vasc Endovascular Surg 2008;42:380-5.
  2. Tercan F, Oğuzkurt L, Kizilkiliç O, Yeniocak A, Gülcan O. Popliteal artery entrapment syndrome. Diagn Interv Radiol 2005;11:222-4.
  3. Rich NM, Collins GJ Jr, McDonald PT, Kozloff L, Clagett GP, Collins JT. Popliteal vascular entrapment. Its increasing interest. Arch Surg 1979;114:1377-84.
  4. Hai Z, Guangrui S, Yuan Z, Zhuodong X, Cheng L, Jingmin L, et al. CT angiography and MRI in patients with popliteal artery entrapment syndrome. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008;191:1760-6.
  5. Gokkus K, Sagtas E, Bakalim T, Taskaya E, Aydin AT. Popliteal entrapment syndrome. A systematic review of the literature and case presentation. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J 2014;4:141-8.
  6. Gourgiotis S, Aggelakas J, Salemis N, Elias C, Georgiou C. Diagnosis and surgical approach of popliteal artery entrapment syndrome: a retrospective study. Vasc Health Risk Manag 2008;4:83-8.
  7. Ozkan U, Oğuzkurt L, Tercan F, Pourbagher A. MRI and DSA findings in popliteal artery entrapment syndrome. Diagn Interv Radiol 2008;14:106-10.
  8. Love JW, Whelan TJ. Popliteal artery entrapment syndrome. Am J Surg 1965;109:620-4.
  9. Insua JA, Young JR, Humphries AW. Popliteal artery entrapment syndrome. Arch Surg 1970;101:771-5.
  10. Aslım E, Akay HT, Korun O, Akgün RC. Type 2 popliteal artery entrapment syndrome: a case report. Turk Gogus Kalp Dama 2012;20:910-2.
  11. Rignault DP, Pailler JL, Lunel F. The "functional" popliteal entrapment syndrome. Int Angiol 1985;4:341-3.
  12. Delaney TA, Gonzalez LL. Occlusion of popliteal artery due to muscular entrapment. Surgery 1971;69:97-101. Bouhoutsos J. Popliteal artery entrapment syndrome: report of 29 cases. Vasc Surg 1980;14:365-74.
  13. Gibson MH, Mills JG, Johnson GE, Downs AR. Popliteal entrapment syndrome. Ann Surg 1977;185:341-8.
  14. Tekbaş G, Gümüş H, Ekici F, Kelekçi S, Yavuz C, Bilici A. A rare cause of intermittent claudication: recurrence of popliteal artery entrapment syndrome in a 16-years-old boy. Turk Gogus Kalp Dama 2013;2:503-5.
  15. Elias DA, White LM, Rubenstein JD, Christakis M, Merchant N. Clinical evaluation and MR imaging features of popliteal artery entrapment and cystic adventitial disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003;180:627-32.
  16. Papaioannou S, Tsitouridis K, Giataganas G, Rodokalakis G, Kyriakou V, Pap