Journals / Türk Göğüs Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 1

Reliability and validity of Family Caregiver Quality of Life Scale in heart failure

Pages
73–80
Publication Date
2022-09-02
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Criterion-related validity was supported by correlations with the Short Form-36 General (r=0.473, p<0.01) and Mental (r=0.406; p<0.01) Health subscales.Conclusion: The Turkish version of this scale can measure the quality of life of family caregivers of heart failure patients with adequate reliability and validity.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background: In this study, the Family Caregiver Quality of Life scale developed specifically for family caregivers of heart failure patients was translated into the Turkish language, and its reliability and validity was performed.Methods: The scale was first translated into Turkish and back-translated, adapting it to the Turkish culture.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The Turkish questionnaire of the scale was applied to 200 family caregivers.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Criterion-related validity was supported by correlations with the Short Form-36 General (r=0.473, p<0.01) and Mental (r=0.406; p<0.01) Health subscales.Conclusion: The Turkish version of this scale can measure the quality of life of family caregivers of heart failure patients with adequate reliability and validity.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background: In this study, the Family Caregiver Quality of Life scale developed specifically for family caregivers of heart failure patients was translated into the Turkish language, and its reliability and validity was performed.Methods: The scale was first translated into Turkish and back-translated, adapting it to the Turkish culture. The Turkish questionnaire of the scale was applied to 200 family caregivers. To evaluate the reliability of the scale and all subscales, test-retest was applied, and the Cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficients were calculated. The structural validity of the scale was examined through the factor analysis.Results: The internal consistency reliability (=0.82) of the Turkish Questionnaire of the scale was proved. Two-week test-retest reliability was supported by an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.91. The questionnaire’s factor structure demonstrated acceptable fit, indicating that it could be applied to the Turkish population. The item loads found by the factor analysis ranged from 0.32 to 0.99, explaining %63 of the variance (eigenvalue=2.61-4.06). Criterion-related validity was supported by correlations with the Short Form-36 General (r=0.473, p<0.01) and Mental (r=0.406; p<0.01) Health subscales.Conclusion: The Turkish version of this scale can measure the quality of life of family caregivers of heart failure patients with adequate reliability and validity.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜRKAN, A., DÜLGEROĞLU, C. (2022). Reliability and validity of Family Caregiver Quality of Life Scale in heart failure. Türk Göğüs Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Dergisi, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 1, 73–80. https://ajindex.com/articles/423896

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Başara BB, Güler C, Yentür GK, editörler. TC Sağlık Bakanlığı Sağlık İstatistikleri Yıllığı 2013. Ankara: Sentez Matbaacılık ve Yayıncılık; 2014. 24. Hu X, Hu X, Su Y, Qu M. Quality of Life among Primary Family Caregivers of Patients with Heart Failure in Southwest China. Rehabil Nurs 2016 Jun 28. 23. Engel KS, Moosbrugger H. Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online 2003;8:23-74. 22. Çolakoğlu ÖM, Büyükekşi C. Açımlayıcı faktör analiz sürecini etkileyen unsurların değerlendirilmesi. Karaelmas Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi 2014;2:58-64. 21. Ercan İ, Kan i. Ölçeklerde Güvenirlik ve Geçerlik. Uludağ Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi 2004;30:211-6. 20. Karakoç FY, Dönmez L. Ölçek Geliştirme Çalışmalarında Temel İlkeler. Tıp Eğitimi Dünyası 2014;40:39-49. 19. Koçyiğit H, Aydemir Ö, Fişek G, Ölmez N, Memiş A. Kısa form-36 (kf-36)'nın türkçe versiyonunun güvenilirliği. İlaç ve Tedavi Dergisi 1999;12:102-6. 18. Çapık C. Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışmalarında doğrulayıcı faktör analizinin kullanımı. Anadolu Hemşirelik ve Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi 2014;17:196-205. 17. Weitzner MA, McMillan SC, Jacobsen PB. Family caregiver quality of life: differences between curative and palliative cancer treatment settings. J Pain Symptom Manage 1999;17:418-28. 16. Weitzner MA, Jacobsen PB, Wagner H Jr, Friedland J, Cox C. The Caregiver Quality of Life Index-Cancer (CQOLC) scale: development and validation of an instrument to measure quality of life of the family caregiver of patients with cancer. Qual Life Res 1999;8:55-63. 15. Harkness KI, Tranmer JE. Measurement of the caregiving experience in caregivers of persons living with heart failure: a review of current instruments. J Card Fail 2007;13:577-87. 14. Demirtepe D, Bozo Ö. Bakıcı İyilik Ölçeği’nin uyarlama, güvenirlik ve geçerlilik çalışması. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları 2009;12:28-37. 13. Lee S, Colditz GA, Berkman LF, Kawachi I. Caregiving and risk of coronary heart disease in U.S. women: a prospective study. Am J Prev Med 2003;24:113-9. 12. Schulz R, Beach SR. Caregiving as a risk factor for mortality: the Caregiver Health Effects Study. JAMA 1999;282:2215-9. 11. Chung ML, Moser DK, Lennie TA, Rayens MK. The effects of depressive symptoms and anxiety on quality of life in patients with heart failure and their spouses: testing dyadic dynamics using Actor-Partner Interdependence Model. J Psychosom Res 2009;67:29-35. 10