SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türk Göğüs Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 2

The relationship between chest pain intensity and physiological indicators after coronary artery bypass grafting: A correlational study

Koroner arter baypas greftleme sonrası göğüs ağrısının şiddeti ve fizyolojik belirteçler arasındaki ilişki: Korelasyon çalışması

Afsaneh ZAREI
Ali Fakhr MOVAHEDI
Abbasali EBRAHIMIAN
Pages
173–177
Publication Date
2022-09-02
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Pain intensity was not significantly differentbetween male and female gender (p=0.064).Conclusion: Our study results show no significant relationshipbetween the chest pain intensity and physiological responses inpatients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background: This study aims to evaluate the relationshipbetween chest pain intensity and physiological indicators inpatients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting.Methods: In this correlational study, chest pain intensity andphysiological responses of a total of 126 coronary artery bypassgrafting patients (104 males, 22 females; mean age 62.3±8.5years; range, 45 to 80 years) during respiratory exercise wereevaluated in a referral hospital setting between December2016 and March 2018.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Physiologicalindicators were collected using the Nihon Kohden (MU65)monitoring device.Results: The mean pain intensity score was 7.8±1.9 (range, 1 to 10).There was no significant correlation between the pain intensityand physiological indicators (p>0.05).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Pain intensity was not significantly differentbetween male and female gender (p=0.064).Conclusion: Our study results show no significant relationshipbetween the chest pain intensity and physiological responses inpatients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2018 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background: This study aims to evaluate the relationshipbetween chest pain intensity and physiological indicators inpatients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting.Methods: In this correlational study, chest pain intensity andphysiological responses of a total of 126 coronary artery bypassgrafting patients (104 males, 22 females; mean age 62.3±8.5years; range, 45 to 80 years) during respiratory exercise wereevaluated in a referral hospital setting between December2016 and March 2018. On the second day after surgery, painintensity was measured by a numerical rating scale. Physiologicalindicators were collected using the Nihon Kohden (MU65)monitoring device.Results: The mean pain intensity score was 7.8±1.9 (range, 1 to 10).There was no significant correlation between the pain intensityand physiological indicators (p>0.05). There was a negativecorrelation between the pain intensity and age of the patient (r=-0.183 and p=0.04). Pain intensity was not significantly differentbetween male and female gender (p=0.064).Conclusion: Our study results show no significant relationshipbetween the chest pain intensity and physiological responses inpatients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada koroner arter baypas greftleme yapılan hastalarda göğüs ağrısının şiddeti ve fizyolojik belirteçler arasındaki ilişki incelendi. Çalışma planı: Bu korelasyon çalışmasına Aralık 2016 - Mart 2018 tarihleri arasında bir üniversite hastanesinde koroner arter baypas greftleme yapılan toplam 126 hastanın (104 erkek, 22 kadın; ort. yaş 62.3±8.5 yıl; dağılım, 45-80 yıl) göğüs ağrısı şiddeti ve fizyolojik yanıtları solunum egzersizi sırasında değerlendirildi. Ameliyatın ikinci gününde ağrı şiddeti sayısal bir değerlendirme ölçeği ile ölçüldü. Fizyolojik belirteçler, Nihon Kohden (MU65) takip cihazı ile belirlendi. Bulgular: Ortalama ağrı şiddeti skoru 7.8±1.9 (dağılım 1-10) idi. Ağrı şiddeti ve fizyolojik belirteçler arasında anlamlı bir ilişki saptanmadı (p>0.05). Ağrı şiddeti ve hastanın yaşı arasında negatif bir ilişki izlendi (r=-0.183 ve p=0.04). Ağrı şiddeti erkek ve kadın cinsiyeti arasında anlamlı düzeyde farklı değildi (p=0.064). Sonuç: Çalışma sonuçlarımız, koroner arter baypas greftleme yapılan hastalarda göğüs ağrısının şiddeti ve fizyolojik yanıtlar arasında anlamlı bir ilişki olmadığını göstermektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ZAREI, A., MOVAHEDI, A. F., EBRAHIMIAN, A. (2022). The relationship between chest pain intensity and physiological indicators after coronary artery bypass grafting: A correlational study. Türk Göğüs Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Dergisi, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 2, 173–177. https://ajindex.com/articles/423829

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Adam S, Osborne S, Welch J, editors. Critical care nursing: science and practice. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2017
  2. Safaie N, Montazerghaem H, Jodati A, Maghamipour N. In-Hospital Complications of Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery in Patients Older Than 70 Years. J Cardiovasc Thorac Res 2015;7:60-2
  3. Eti Aslan F, Korkmaz DF, Karabacak Ü. Pain in cardiac surgery and the nursing approach. Turk Gogus Kalp Dama 2012;20:172-6
  4. Cücü O, Karaca P, Enc Y, Yücel O, Aksoy T, Şenay Ş, Canik S. Comparison of thoracic paravertebral and epidural blocks for pain relief after thoracotomy. Turk Gogus Kalp Dama 2006;14:42-7
  5. Fayazi S, Shariati AAA, Momeni M. The efficacy of Benson's relaxation technique on postoperative pain in coronary artery bypass graft. Jundishapur Sci Med J 2010;8:479-89
  6. Kumar P, Tripathi L. Challenges in pain assessment: Pain intensity scales. Indian J Pain 2014;28:61-70
  7. Li Q, Wan X, Gu C, Yu Y, Huang W, Li S, et al. Pain assessment using the critical-care pain observation tool in Chinese critically ill ventilated adults. J Pain Symptom Manage 2014;48:975-82
  8. Ledowski T, Reimer M, Chavez V, Kapoor V, Wenk M. Effects of acute postoperative pain on catecholamine plasma levels, hemodynamic parameters, and cardiac autonomic control. Pain 2012;153:759-64
  9. Chanques G, Sebbane M, Barbotte E, Viel E, Eledjam JJ, Jaber S. A prospective study of pain at rest: incidence and characteristics of an unrecognized symptom in surgical and trauma versus medical intensive care unit patients. Anesthesiology 2007;107:858-60
  10. Cowen R, Stasiowska MK, Laycock H, Bantel C. Assessing pain objectively: the use of physiological markers. Anaesthesia 2015;70:828-47
  11. Samartzis D, Borthakur A, Belfer I, Bow C, Lotz JC, Wang HQ, et al. Novel diagnostic and prognostic methods for disc degeneration and low back pain. Spine J 2015;15:1919-32
  12. Gélinas C, Johnston C. Pain assessment in the critically ill ventilated adult: validation of the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool and physiologic indicators. Clin J Pain 2007;23:497-505
  13. Krejcie RV, Morgan DW. Determining sample size for research activities. Educ Psychol Meas 1970;30:607-10
  14. Ferreira-Valente MA, Pais-Ribeiro JL, Jensen MP. Validity of four pain intensity rating scales. Pain 2011;152:2399-404
  15. Hawker GA, Mian S, Kendzerska T, French M. Measures of adult pain: Visual Analog Scale for Pain (VAS Pain), Numeric Rating Scale for Pain (NRS Pain), McGill Pain Questionnai