Journals / Türk Göğüs Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 2

Comparison of patient-prothesis mismatch after surgical aortic valve replacement and transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Cerrahi aort kapak replasmanı ve transkateter aort kapak implantasyonu sonrası hasta-protez uyumsuzluğunun karşılaştırılması

Pages
143–151
Publication Date
2022-09-02
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Based on our study results, wesuggest that the use of surgical approach for aortic valve replacementmay prevent potential complications of transcatheter aortic valveimplantation.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background: The aim of this study is to analyze the outcomes andincidence of postoperative patient-prothesis mismatch after surgicalaortic valve replacement using supra-annular bioprosthesis andtranscatheter aortic valve implantation.Methods: Between January 2012 and June 2015, a total of 73 patients(37 males, 36 females; mean age 71.8±5.7 years; range, 65 to 82 years)who underwent either surgical aortic valve replacement using supraannularbioprosthesis (n=36) or transcatheter aortic valve implantation(n=37) were included.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Postoperative patient-prothesis mismatch wasdefined as absent, mild-to-moderate, and severe, if the indexedeffective orifice area was >0.85 cm2/m2, >0.65 to 0.05).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Based on our study results, wesuggest that the use of surgical approach for aortic valve replacementmay prevent potential complications of transcatheter aortic valveimplantation.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2012 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study is to analyze the outcomes andincidence of postoperative patient-prothesis mismatch after surgicalaortic valve replacement using supra-annular bioprosthesis andtranscatheter aortic valve implantation.Methods: Between January 2012 and June 2015, a total of 73 patients(37 males, 36 females; mean age 71.8±5.7 years; range, 65 to 82 years)who underwent either surgical aortic valve replacement using supraannularbioprosthesis (n=36) or transcatheter aortic valve implantation(n=37) were included. Postoperative patient-prothesis mismatch wasdefined as absent, mild-to-moderate, and severe, if the indexedeffective orifice area was >0.85 cm2/m2, >0.65 to 0.05). Postoperative outcomes were similarbetween the groups. Mid-term mortality at a mean follow-up of47.7±7.3 months was similar between the groups (p=0.158).Conclusion: In high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis, patientprosthesismismatch is mild-to-moderate after surgical aortic valvereplacement and transcatheter aortic valve implantation; however,this has no effect on early mortality. Based on our study results, wesuggest that the use of surgical approach for aortic valve replacementmay prevent potential complications of transcatheter aortic valveimplantation.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada supra-anüler biyoprotez kapak ile cerrahi aort kapak replasmanı ve transkateter aort kapak implantasyonunun sonuçları ve işlem sonrası hasta-protez uyumsuzluğu sıklığı incelendi. Çalışma planı: Ocak 2012 - Haziran 2015 tarihleri arasında supra-anüler biyoprotez ile cerrahi aort kapak replasmanı (n=36) veya transkateter aort kapak implantasyonu (n=37) yapılan toplam 73 hasta (37 erkek, 36 kadın; ort. yaş 71.8±5.7 yıl; dağılım, 65-82 yıl) çalışmaya alındı. İşlem sonrası hasta-protez uyumsuzluğu indekslenmiş efektif orifis alanı >0.85 cm2/m2 ise “yok”, >0.65 ila 0.05). Ameliyat sonrası sonuçlar gruplar arasında benzerdi. Ortalama 47.7±7.3 aylık takip süresince orta-dönem mortalite gruplar arasında benzerdi (p=0.158). Sonuç: Ciddi aort darlığı olan yüksek riskli hastalarda, hastaprotez uyumsuzluğu cerrahi aort kapak replasmanı ve transkateter aort kapak implantasyonu sonrasında hafif-orta derecelidir; ancak bu durum erken mortaliteyi etkilememektedir. Çalışma sonuçlarımıza göre, aort kapak replasmanında cerrahi yaklaşım uygulaması transkateter aort kapak implantasyonunun muhtemel komplikasyonlarını önleyebilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

YILMAZ, B. E., ERSOY, B., KARACALILAR, M., ONAN, B. (2022). Comparison of patient-prothesis mismatch after surgical aortic valve replacement and transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Türk Göğüs Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Dergisi, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 2, 143–151. https://ajindex.com/articles/423814

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Pibarot P, Weissman NJ, Stewart WJ, Hahn RT, Lindman BR, McAndrew T, et al. Incidence and sequelae of prosthesispatient mismatch in transcatheter versus surgical valve replacement in high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis: a PARTNER trial cohort--a analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014;64:1323-34
  2. Gedik HS, Korkmaz K, Lafçı G, Yalçınkaya A, Çağlı K. The effects of implanted valve sizes on ventricular hypertrophy in aortic stenosis. [Article in Turkish] Anadolu Kardiyol Derg 2012;12:165-70
  3. Uluçam M. Diagnosis and treatment of prosthetic valve dysfunction. [Article in Turkish] Anadolu Kardiyol Derg 2009;9:35-42
  4. Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG, Cartier PC, Métras J, Lemieux MD. Patient-prosthesis mismatch can be predicted at the time of operation. Ann Thorac Surg 2001;71:265-8
  5. Clavel MA, Webb JG, Pibarot P, Altwegg L, Dumont E, Thompson C, et al. Comparison of the hemodynamic performance of percutaneous and surgical bioprostheses for the treatment of severe aortic stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;53:1883-91
  6. Kukucka M, Pasic M, Dreysse S, Mladenow A, Habazettl H, Hetzer R, et al. Patient-prosthesis mismatch after transapical aortic valve implantation: incidence and impact on survival. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013;145:391-7
  7. Bakir I, Casselman FP, Onan B, Van Praet F, Vermeulen Y, Degrieck I. Does a minimally invasive approach increase the incidence of patient-prosthesis mismatch in aortic valve replacement? J Heart Valve Dis 2014;23:161-7
  8. Dumesnil JG, Pibarot P. Prosthesis-patient mismatch: an update. Curr Cardiol Rep 2011;13:250-7
  9. Head SJ, Mokhles MM, Osnabrugge RL, Pibarot P, Mack MJ, Takkenberg JJ, et al. The impact of prosthesispatient mismatch on long-term survival after aortic valve replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 34 observational studies comprising 27 186 patients with 133 141 patient-years. Eur Heart J 2012;33:1518-29
  10. Smith CR, Leon MB, Mack MJ, Miller DC, Moses JW, Svensson LG, et al. Transcatheter versus surgical aorticvalve replacement in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med 2011;364:2187-98
  11. Kodali SK, Williams MR, Smith CR, Svensson LG, Webb JG, Makkar RR, et al. Two-year outcomes after transcatheter or surgical aortic-valve replacement. N Engl J Med 2012;366:1686-95
  12. Nishimura RA, Otto CM, Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Erwin JP 3rd, Guyton RA, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiolo