SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Pamukkale Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 3

Production of block by using fly ash, lime and glass powder

Uçucu kül, kireç ve cam tozu kullanarak blok üretimi

Paki TURGUT
Pages
413–418
Publication Date
2018-06-29
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was found that curing time and amounts of additional materials that were lime and waste glass powder in the block were directly effective on the results.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:A large amount of fly ash is accumulating in Kangal Thermal Power Plant in our country.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Blocks were cured for periods of 24, 48, 72 and 96 hours at 70 °C.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was found that curing time and amounts of additional materials that were lime and waste glass powder in the block were directly effective on the results.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Uçucu kül · Kireç · Atık cam

Abstract

A large amount of fly ash is accumulating in Kangal Thermal Power Plant in our country. Fly ash produced in this plant is abandoned to the landfills and causes certain serious environmental problems and health hazards. Waste glass also constitutes some problems. The most of non-recyclable glass is sent to landfill that is not an environment-friendly solution. Therefore, there is a strong need to be utilized it in building sector because it is not biodegradable. In this study, masonry blocks were produced by using fly ash, lime and waste glass powder. Blocks were cured for periods of 24, 48, 72 and 96 hours at 70 °C. The compressive and flexural strengths, water absorption, sorptivity and density values of blocks were determined. It was found that curing time and amounts of additional materials that were lime and waste glass powder in the block were directly effective on the results. The results obtained showed that block could be produced by using these waste materials.

Özet

Ülkemizde bulunan Kangal Termik Santrali’nde çok miktarda uçucu kül birikmektedir. Bu santralde üretilen uçucu küller depolama alanlarına dökülmekte, ciddi çevre problemleri ve sağlık sorunlarına sebep olmaktadır. Atık cam da bazı problemler doğurmaktadır. Geri dönüşümü olmayan camların çoğu, çevre dostu bir çözüm olmayan depolama alanına gönderilir. Dolayısıyla, atık cam biyolojik olarak ayrışmadığından, yapı sektöründe kullanılmasına kuvvetle ihtiyaç vardır. Bu çalışmada, uçucu kül, kireç ve cam tozu kullanılarak yapı blokları üretildi. Bloklar 70 oC sıcaklıkta 24, 48, 72 ve 96 sa.’lik sürelerde kür edildi. Blokların basınç ve yarmada çekme dayanımları, su emme, kılcal su emme ve yoğunluk değerleri belirlendi. Kür süresinin yanında, blok içerisindeki kireç ve atık cam tozu gibi ilave malzemelerin miktarlarının da sonuçlar üzerinde direk etkili olduğu bulundu. Elde edilen sonuçlar, bu atık malzemeler kullanılarak blok üretilebileceğini gösterdi.

🔖

Cite This Article

TURGUT, P. (2018). Production of block by using fly ash, lime and glass powder. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 3, 413–418. https://ajindex.com/articles/42352

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. T.C. Enerji ve Tabii Kaynaklar Bakanlığı. “Bilgi Merkezi”. http://www.enerji.gov.tr/tr-TR/Sayfalar/Elektrik (11.12.1016). ASTM International. “Specification for Fly Ash and Raw or Calcined Natural Pozzolan for Use as A Mineral Admixture in Portland Cement Concrete”. West Conshohocken, PA, USA, ASTM C 618, 2017.
  2. Berry M, Cross D, Stephens J. “Changing the environment: an alternative green concrete produced without portland cement”. Proceedings of Coal Ash Conference, Lexington, KY, USA, 4-7 May 2009. Caldarone MN. High Strength Concrete: A Practical Guide. 1st ed. New York, USA, Taylor&Francis, 2009.
  3. Turgut P. “Masonry composite material made of limestone powder and fly ash”. Powder Technology, 204(1), 42–47, 2010.
  4. Turgut P. “Manufacturing of building bricks without portland cement”. Journal of Cleaner Production, 37, 361–67, 2012.
  5. Turgut P. “Fly ash block containing limestone and glass powder wastes”. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 17(6), 1425–31, 2013.
  6. Pollard TJS, Montgomery MD, Sollar JC, Perry R. “Organic compounds in the cement-based stabilisation/ solidification of hazardous mixed wastes-Mechanistic and process considerations”. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 28(3), 313-27, 1991.
  7. Tokyay M, Çetin BK. “Preslenmiş, buhar kürü uygulanmış uçucu kül-kireç tuğlalarının dayanım ve su emme özellikleri”. Teknik Dergi, 2(4), 385-94, 1991.
  8. Topcu IB, Canbaz M. “Properties of concrete containing waste glass”. Cement Concrete Research, 34(1), 267–74, 2004.
  9. Turgut P. “Kireçtaşı ve cam tozunun briket yapımında kullanılması”. 7. Ulusal Beton Kongresi, İstanbul, Türkiye, 29 Kasım-1 Aralık 2007.
  10. Scmidt A, Saia WHF. “Alkali-Aggregate reaction tests on glass used for exposed aggregate wall panel work”. ACI Materials Journal, 60, 1235-36, 1963.
  11. Johnston CD. “Waste glass as coarse aggregate for concrete”. Journal of Testing and Evaluation, 2(5), 344-50, 1974.
  12. Meyer C, Baxter S, Jin W. “Alkali-Aggregate reaction in concrete mechanism”. Cement and Concrete Research, 17(1), 141-52, 1987.
  13. Xie Z, Xi Y. “Use of recycled glass as a raw material in the manufacture of portland cement”. Materials and Structures, 35(8), 510-515, 2002.
  14. Shao Y, Lefort T, Moras S, Rodriguez D. “Studies on concrete containing ground waste glass”. Cement and Concrete Research, 30(1), 91-100, 2000.
  15. Shi Y, Wu C, Riefler C, Wang H. “Characteristics and pozzolanic reactivity of glass powders”. Cement and Concrete Research, 35(5), 987-93, 2005. Urhan S, “Alkali silica and pozzolanic reactions in concrete. P