Journals / Pamukkale Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 4

A wage model consisted of job evaluation employee characteristics and job performance

İş değerlemesi kişisel özellikler ve iş performansından oluşan bir maaş modeli

Pages
720–729
Publication Date
2018-08-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this study, it is intended to develop a salary model that creates a wage level from overall score consisting of job evaluation, employee characteristics and job performance in order to ensure wage fairness and also enhance employee’ satisfaction.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Although several substantial attempts, there is still a lack of research investigating of how employee characteristics and performance are integrated into a wage structure.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, it is intended to develop a salary model that creates a wage level from overall score consisting of job evaluation, employee characteristics and job performance in order to ensure wage fairness and also enhance employee’ satisfaction.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results indicated that the job point has significantly greater influence on wage level.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Maaş modeli · İş değerlemesi · İş analizi

Abstract

Although several substantial attempts, there is still a lack of research investigating of how employee characteristics and performance are integrated into a wage structure. In this study, it is intended to develop a salary model that creates a wage level from overall score consisting of job evaluation, employee characteristics and job performance in order to ensure wage fairness and also enhance employee’ satisfaction. In the first phase, a point factor job evaluation system including sixteen factors was adapted to determine the job scores of the white-collar jobs within a company. The score generates a basic payment. There will be extra pay for the staff who are well educated and experienced for the job. A method producing a score from employee characteristics in terms of “education” and “experience” factors was developed. Job performance was measured with how an employee achieves the task activities for eleven job evaluation factors. These three components were integrated to a composite score to translate a wage level. The system was implemented in a middle sized manufacturing company for white-collar jobs. The results indicated that the job point has significantly greater influence on wage level.

Özet

Önemli girişimlere rağmen, kişisel özellikler ve performansın maaş yapısına nasıl entegre edileceği konusunda araştırma çalışmalarda eksiklik devam etmektedir. Bu çalışmada, ücret adaleti sağlamak ve personel tatminini yükseltmek için iş değerlemesi, kişisel özellikler ve iş performansında oluşan toplam skordan bir ücret düzeyi oluşturan bir maaş modelinin geliştirilmesi amaçlanmıştır. İlk aşamada, 16 faktörden oluşan puan yöntemi iş değerleme sistemi, bir işletmede beyaz yakalı işlerin iş skorunu belirlemek için uyarlanmıştır. İş skoru temel ücreti verir. İşin gerektirdiği düzeyden daha yüksek eğitim ve deneyime sahip olan personel için ek ödeme olacaktır. Eğitim ve deneyim yönüyle kişisel özelliklerden skor üreten bir yöntem geliştirilmiştir. İş performansı, personelin 11 iş değerleme faktörü için görev aktivitelerini nasıl başardığı olarak ölçülmüştür. Böyle üç bileşen, bir ücret düzeyine ulaşabilmek için bir birleşik skora dönüştürülmüştür. Sistem, orta ölçekli bir üretim işletmesinde beyaz yakalı işler için uygulanmıştır. Sonuçlar, iş puanının ücret düzeyinde daha büyük etkiye sahip olduğunu göstermiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KAHYA, E. (2018). A wage model consisted of job evaluation employee characteristics and job performance. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 4, 720–729. https://ajindex.com/articles/42341

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. Conyon M, Peck S, Read, L. “Performance pay and corporate structure in UK firms”. European Management Journal, 19(1), 73-82, 2001.
  2. Ahmed NU. “An analytic technique to develop factor weights in job evaluation”. The Mid-Atlantic Journal of Business, 25(5), 1-6, 1989.
  3. Gupta S, Chakraborty M. “Job evaluation in fuzzy environment”. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 100, 71-76, 1998.
  4. Hahn DC, Depboye RL. “Effects of training and information on the accuracy and reliability of job evaluations”. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73(2), 146-153, 1988.
  5. Das B, Garcia-Diaz A. “Factor selection guidelines for job evaluation: A computerized statistical procedure”. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 40, 259-272, 2001.
  6. Wilde E. “A job evaluation case history”. Work Study, 41(2), 6-11, 1992.
  7. Dohmen TJ. “Performance, seniority, and wages: formal salary systems and individual earnings profiles”. Labour Economics, 11(6), 741-763, 2004.
  8. Waldman DA, Spanglar WD. “Putting together the pieces: A closer look at the determinants of job performance”. Human Performance, 2(1), 29-59, 1989.
  9. Heneman RL. “The changing nature of pay systems and the need for new midrange theories of pay”. Human Resource Management Review, 10(3), 245-247, 2000.
  10. Morgeson FP, Campion MA, Maertz CP. “Understanding pay satisfaction: The limits of a compensation system implementation”. Journal of Business and Psychology, 16(1), 133-149, 2001.
  11. Weinberger TE. “Determining the relative importance of compensable factors: The application of dominance analysis to job evaluation”. Compensation and Benefits Management, 11(2), 17-23, 1995.
  12. Charnes A, Cooper WW, Ferguson RO. “Optimal estimation of executive compensation by linear programming”. Management Science, 1(1), 138-151, 1955.
  13. Gupta JND, Ahmed NU. “A goal programming approach to job evaluation”. Computers and Engineering, 14(2), 147-152, 1988.
  14. Kutlu AC, Ekmekçioğlu M, Kahraman C. “A fuzzy multi-criteria approach to point-factor method for job evaluation”. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 25(3), 659-671, 2013.
  15. Pittel M. “Recalibrating point factor job evaluation plans to reflect labor market pay levels”. Workspan, 42(10), 29-33, 1999.
  16. Kahya E. “Metal iş kolunda bir işletme için işdeğerleme sisteminin geliştirilmesi”. Endüstri Mühendisliği Dergisi, 17(4), 2-21, 2006.
  17. Dağdeviren M, Akay D, Kurt M. “İş değerlendirme sürecinde analitic hiyerarşi prosesi ve uygulaması”. Gazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, 19(2), 100-105, 2004.
  18. Kahya E. “Revising the met