Journals / Pamukkale Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 6

Settlements hazard of soil due to liquefaction along Tabriz Metro line 2

Tebriz Metro 2 hattı boyunca sıvılaşmaya bağlı olarak meydana gelen oturma tehlikesi

Pages
942–951
Publication Date
2018-12-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Also, there is a good adoption between LPI and settlement values in soil layers.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:After the occurrence of liquefaction due to earthquake, the settlement of soil layers damage to structures located on the ground or the underground.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In the last two decades, different experimental methods were used to determine the rate of volumetric strain (settlement) and maximum shear strain based on field and laboratory test data.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Also, there is a good adoption between LPI and settlement values in soil layers.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Sıvılaşma · Standard penetrasyon testi (SPT) · Zemin oturmasi (hacimsel gerilme)

Abstract

After the occurrence of liquefaction due to earthquake, the settlement of soil layers damage to structures located on the ground or the underground. In the last two decades, different experimental methods were used to determine the rate of volumetric strain (settlement) and maximum shear strain based on field and laboratory test data. The main purpose of the present study is the evaluation of the rate of settlement after the occurrence of liquefaction in soils and study relationship between liquefaction potential index (LPI) and settlement. The results of the standard resistance penetration test along Tabriz Metro Line 2 used to estimate the liquefaction potential of soil layers in 54 boreholes. Then, the value of settlement in soil layers due to liquefaction in both dry and saturated soil layers were evaluated. In continue, LPI was calculated. The results of this study showed that the rate of settlement in saturated soil layers was remarkably higher than the layers above the underground water level and with an increase in the density of the soil layers, the rate of settlement and soil volumetric strain decreased. Also, there is a good adoption between LPI and settlement values in soil layers.

Özet

Deprem nedeniyle sıvılaşma meydana geldiğinde, zemin katmanlarının çözülmesi içinde bulunan veya yeraltı yapılarına hasar verebilir. Son yirmi yılda, farklı deneysel yöntemler alan ve laboratuvar test verilerine dayandırılarak hacimsel gerilme (zemin oturması) ve maksimum kayma gerginliğini belirlemek için kullanıldı. Bu çalışmanın temel amacı, zemin sıvılaşmasından sonra zemin oturma oranı oranının değerlendirilmesi ve sıvılaşma potansiyel endeksi (LPI) ile oturma arasındaki çalışma ilişkisinin değerlendirilmesidir. Tebriz Metro 2 Hattı boyunca Standard Penetrasyon testi (SPT) 54 sondaj deliğindeki sonuçlarından zemin katmanlarının sıvılaşma potansiyelini tahmin etmek için kullanıldı. Daha sonra hem kuru hem de doymuş zemin katmanlarında sıvılaştırmaya bağlı olarak zemin katmanlarında oturma oranı hesaplanmıştır. Devamında LPI hesaplanmıştır. Çalışmadan elde edilen sonuçlar gösteriyor ki, doymuş zemin katmanlarındaki oturma oranının, yeraltı su seviyesinin üzerindeki zemin katmanlardan belirgin derecede yüksek olduğunu ve zemin katmanlarının yoğunluğunun arttığında oturma oranının ve zemin hacimsel gerilimin azaldığını gösterdi. Ayrıca, zemin katmanlarında LPI ve zemin oturma değerleri arasında iyi bir uyum var.

🔖

Cite This Article

GHASEMİAN, M., DABİRİ, R., MAHARİ, R. (2018). Settlements hazard of soil due to liquefaction along Tabriz Metro line 2. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 6, 942–951. https://ajindex.com/articles/42267

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Ishihara K, Yoshimine M. “Evaluation of settlement in sand deposits flowing liquefaction during earthquakes”. Journal of soils and foundations, 32(1), 173-178, 1992.
  2. Seed H B, Idriss I M. “Simplified procedure for evaluating soil liquefaction potential”. Journal of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Division ASCE, 97(9), 1249–1273, 1971.
  3. Seed HB, Idriss IM, Arango I.” Evaluation of liquefaction potential using field performance data”. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering (ASCE), 1093, 458-482, 1983.
  4. Idriss IM, Boulanger RW. “Semi-empirical procedures for evaluating liquefaction potential during earthquakes”. Soil Dynamic and Earthquake Engineering, 26, 115-130, 2006.
  5. Idriss IM, Boulanger RW. “SPT-Based Liquefaction Triggering Procedures”. Report No. UCD/CGM-10/02, Center for Geotechnical Modeling, University of California, Davis, 2010.
  6. Robertson PK, Wride CE. “Evaluation cyclic liquefaction potential using the cone penetration test”. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 35(3), 442-459, 1998.
  7. Andrus RD, Stokoe KH. “Liquefaction Resistance Based on Shear Wave Velocity NCEER Workshop on Evaluation of Liquefaction Resistance of Soils”. Technical Report NCEER-97-0022.
  8. TL. Youd and IM. Idriss, Eds, Held 4-5 January 1996,
  9. Salt lake City, UT, NCEER, Buffalo, NY, 88-128, 1997.
  10. Andrus RD, Piratheepan P, Ellis BS, Zhang J, Juang HC. “Comparing liquefaction evaluation methods using penetration Vs relationship”. Journal of Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 24(2), 713-721, 2004.
  11. Dabiri R, Askari F, Shafiee A, Jafari MK. “Shear wave velocity based Liquefaction resistance of sand-silt mixtures: deterministic versus probabilistic approach”. Iranian journal of science and technology, Transactions of civil engineering, 35(C2), 199-215, 2011.
  12. Askari F, Dabiri R, Shafiee A, Jafari MK. “Effects of non-plastic fines content on cyclic resistance and post liquefaction of sand-silt mixtures based on shear wave velocity”. Journal of seismology and earthquake engineering, 12(1, 2), 13-24, 2010.
  13. Pyke R, Seed HB, Chan CK. “Settlement of sands under multidirectional shaking”. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering ASCE, 101(4), 379 -398, 1975.
  14. Silver ML, Seed HB.”Volume changes in sands during cyclic load”. Journal of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Division, ASCE, 97(SM9), 1171-1182, 1971.
  15. Lee KL, Albaisa A. ”Earthquake ınduced settlements in saturated sands”. Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division ASCE, 100(4), 387-406, 1974.
  16. Tatsuoka F, Sasaki T, Yamada S. “Settlement in saturated s