Journals / Yaşar Üniversitesi E-Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 65

The Effects of Corporate Social Responsibility on Perceived Price and Perceived Service Quality

Kurumsal Sosyal Sorumluluk Algısının Algılanan Fiyat ve Algılanan Hizmet Kalitesi Üzerindeki Etkileri

Pages
295–314
Publication Date
2022-01-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Furthermore, it has been found that the perceived price has an effect on the perceived service quality.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, the effects of corporate social responsibility perceptions towards banking services of people living in Mardin, a province in southeastern Turkey, on perceived price and perceived service quality were investigated.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The population of the research consists of people who live in Mardin and regularly collaborate with banks.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Furthermore, it has been found that the perceived price has an effect on the perceived service quality.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Kurumsal sosyal sorumluluk algısı · Algılanan fiyat · Algılanan hizmet kalitesi

Abstract

In this study, the effects of corporate social responsibility perceptions towards banking services of people living in Mardin, a province in southeastern Turkey, on perceived price and perceived service quality were investigated. In addition, the effect of perceived price on perceived service quality was also examined. The population of the research consists of people who live in Mardin and regularly collaborate with banks. In this context, 254 questionnaires were collected. Partial least squares (PLS) path analysis was used to test the model and hypotheses created in line with the purpose of the study. Based on the findings, it has been determined that customers' perception of corporate social responsibility has an impact on perceived price and service quality. Furthermore, it has been found that the perceived price has an effect on the perceived service quality.

Özet

Bu çalışmada Mardin’de yaşayan insanların bankacılık hizmetlerine yönelik kurumsal sosyal sorumluluk algılarının algılanan fiyat ve algılanan hizmet kalitesi üzerindeki etkileri araştırılmıştır. Ayrıca algılanan fiyatın algılanan hizmet kalitesi üzerindeki etkisi de incelenmiştir. Araştırmanın evrenini Mardin’de yaşayıp düzenli olarak bankalarla işbirliği yapan kişiler oluşturmaktadır. Bu bağlamda 254 anket toplanmıştır. Araştırmanın amacı doğrultusunda oluşturulan modelin ve hipotezlerin test edilmesinde kısmi en küçük kareler (PLS-partial least squares) yol analizi kullanılmıştır. Buna göre; tüketicilerin kurumsal sosyal sorumluk algısının algılanan fiyat ve hizmet kalitesi üzerinde etkilerinin olduğu belirlenmiştir. Yine algılanan fiyatın algılanan hizmet kalitesine etkisi olduğu tespit edilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞENGÜN, H. İ., USLU, A. (2022). The Effects of Corporate Social Responsibility on Perceived Price and Perceived Service Quality. Yaşar Üniversitesi E-Dergisi, Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 65, 295–314. https://ajindex.com/articles/422130

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Afthanorhan, W. M. A. B. W. 2013. A comparison of partial least square structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) and covariance based structural equation modeling (CB-SEM) for confirmatory factor analysis. International Journal of Engineering Science and Innovative Technology, 2(5),198-205.
  2. Altunışık, R., Özdemir, Ş., & Torlak, Ö. 2012. Modern Pazarlama. İstanbul:
  3. Değişim Yayınları.
  4. Auger, P., Burke, P., Devinney, T., & Louviere, J. 2003. What will consumers pay for social product features? Journal of Business Ethics, 42, 281-304.
  5. Berry, Leonard L. 1999. Discovering the Soul of Service. New York: The Free Press.
  6. Brammer, S. J., & Pavelin, S. 2006. Corporate reputation and social performance: The importance of fi t. Journal of Management Studies, 43(3), 435- 455. Carman, J. 1990. Consumer perceptions of service quality: An assessment of the SERVQUAL dimensions. Journal of Retailing, 66(1), 33- 55. Chomvilailuk, R., & Butcher, K. 2010. Enhancing. Brand preference through corporate social responsibility initiatives in the Thai banking sector. Asia-Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 22(3), 397–418. Commission of the European Communities 2001. Green Book. Promote a European Framework For CSR. Brussels: Author. Retrieved from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/ 9. Comunicarseweb Costa, R. 2009. Responsabilidad Social y Ética Empresarial. Libertad y Desarrollo. http://www.lyd.com/programas/economico.html (Erişim Tarihi: 22.01.2021).
  7. Crawford, F. & Mathews, R. 2001. The Myth of Excellence: Why Great Companies Never Try to Be the Best at Everything. New York: Crown Business. Falk, R. F. & Miller, N. B. 1992.
  8. A primer for soft modelling. Akron, OH: University of Akron Press.
  9. Ferreira, D. A., Avila, M. G., & De Faria, M. D. 2010. Corporate social responsibility and consumers' perception of price. Social Responsibility Journal. 6(2).208-221.
  10. Gabler, C.B. - Landers, V.M., & Reynolds, K.E. 2017. purchase decision regret: negative consequences of the steadily ıncreasing discount strategy, Journal of Business Research, 1-8, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.01.002. García de los Salmones, M. D. M., & Rodríguez del Bosque Rodríguez, I. A. 2005. Estudio de las percepciones de los usuarios de telefonía hacia la empresa pionera en el mercado y las seguidoras. Revista Espanola De InvestigacionDe Marketing Esic 9(1), 99-126. García, I., Gibaja, J. and Mujika, A. 2007. Opinión del consumidor guipuzcoano sobre la Responsabilidad Social Corporativa. In J.M. Guibert (Coord