Journals / Yaşar Üniversitesi E-Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 63

Retaining the Best Talents: The Impact of Employer Branding and Psychological Capital

En İyi Yetenekleri Elde Tutmak: İşveren Markasının ve Psikolojik Sermayenin Etkisi

Pages
1414–1429
Publication Date
2021-07-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Additionally, psychological capital moderates the relationship between employer branding and intention to stay.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The concept of employer branding has attracted great attention of researchers in a variety of disciplines due to its role in attracting and retaining the best talents.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The aforementioned hypotheses were tested via structural equation modeling and data obtained from 289 white-collar employees.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Additionally, psychological capital moderates the relationship between employer branding and intention to stay.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Destekleyici örgüt kültürü · Psikolojik sermaye · İşveren markası

Abstract

The concept of employer branding has attracted great attention of researchers in a variety of disciplines due to its role in attracting and retaining the best talents. However, few studies examine employer branding’s impact on current employee behaviors. In this vein, the purpose of the study is to examine the antecedents and consequences of employer branding. The aforementioned hypotheses were tested via structural equation modeling and data obtained from 289 white-collar employees. Results empirically indicate that: (1) supportive organizational culture is positively associated with employer branding, (2) employer branding positively relates to intention to stay, (3) employer branding partially mediates the relationship between supportive organizational culture and intention to stay. Additionally, psychological capital moderates the relationship between employer branding and intention to stay.

Özet

İşveren markası kavramı, en iyi yetenekleri kuruma çekme ve elde tutmadaki rolü nedeniyle çeşitli disiplinlerdeki araştırmacıların büyük ilgisini çekmiştir. Ancak çok az çalışma, işveren markasının mevcut çalışan davranışları üzerindeki etkisini incelemiştir. Bu bağlamda çalışmanın amacı, işveren markasının öncül ve ardıllarını incelemektir. Araştırmaya konu olan hipotezler, yapısal eşitlik modellemesi ve 289 beyaz yakalı çalışandan elde edilen verilerle test edilmiştir. Sonuçlar şunu göstermektedir: (1) destekleyici örgüt kültürü, işveren markasıyla pozitif olarak ilişkilidir; (2) işveren markası, işte kalma niyetiyle pozitif olarak ilişkilidir; (3) işveren markası, destekleyici örgüt kültürü ve işte kalma niyeti arasındaki ilişkiye aracılık etmektedir. Ek olarak psikolojik sermaye, işveren markası ile işte kalma niyeti arasındaki ilişkide düzenleyici etkiye sahiptir.

🔖

Cite This Article

MÜCELDİLİ, B., TATAR, B., ERDİL, P. D. O. (2021). Retaining the Best Talents: The Impact of Employer Branding and Psychological Capital. Yaşar Üniversitesi E-Dergisi, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 63, 1414–1429. https://ajindex.com/articles/422094

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Aggerholm, H. K., Andersen, S. E., and Thomsen, C. 2011. “Conceptualising employer branding in sustainable organisations.” Corporate Communications, 16(2), 105–123. https://doi.org/10.1108/13563281111141642
  2. Ahmad, N. A., and Daud, S. 2016. “Engaging People with Employer Branding.” Procedia Economics and Finance, 35(October 2015), 690–698. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(16)00086-1
  3. Anderson, J. C., and Gerbing, D. W. 1988. “Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-Step Approach.” Psychological Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411
  4. Avey, J. B., Reichard, R. J., Luthans, F., and Mhatre, K. H. 2011. “Meta-analysis of the impact of positive psychological capital on employee attitudes, behaviors, and performance.” Human Resource Development Quarterly, 22(2), 127–152. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.20070
  5. Backhaus, K., and Tikoo, S. 2004. “Conceptualizing and researching employer branding.” Career Development International, 9(5), 501-517. https://doi.org/10.1108/13620430410550754
  6. Berthon, P., Ewing, M., and Hah, L. L. 2005. “Captivating company: dimensions of attractiveness in employer branding.” International journal of advertising, 24 (2), 151-172. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2005.110072912
  7. Cascio, W. F., and Graham, B. Z. 2016. “New Strategic Role for HR: Leading the Employer-Branding Process.” Organization Management Journal, 13(4), 182–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/15416518.2016.1244640
  8. Charbonnier-Voirin, A., Poujol, J. F., and Vignolles, A. 2017. “From value congruence to employer brand: Impact on organizational identification and word of mouth”. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 34(4), 429–437. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjas.1379
  9. Chhabra, N. L., and Sharma, S. 2014. “Employer branding: Strategy for improving employer attractiveness.” International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 22(1), 48–60. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-09-2011-0513
  10. Dabirian, A., Kietzmann, J., and Diba, H. 2017. “A great place to work!? Understanding crowdsourced employer branding.” Business Horizons, 60(2), 197–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2016.11.005
  11. De Vos, A., Buyens, D., and Schalk, R. 2003. “Psychological contract development during organizational socialization: Adaptation to reality and the role of reciprocity.” Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24, 537–559. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.205
  12. Edwards, M. R., and Edwards, T. 2013. “Employee responses to changing aspects of the employer brand following a multina