Journals / SOSYAL BİLİMLER METİNLERİ / 2018 / Cilt: 2018 - Sayı: 2

A Review of Country-level and Firm-level Factors in Arbitrage Pricing Theory and A Quick Test with Large Dataset

Arbitraj Fiyatlama Teorisi’nde Kullanılan Ülke Düzeyinde ve İşletme Düzeyinde Faktörlerin Gözden Geçirilmesi ve Büyük Veri Seti ile Hızlı Bir Test

Pages
102–117
Publication Date
2018-10-26
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

For micro model, 5 key firm specific variables, beta, book-to-market equity, earnings-to-price ratio, size and leverage are examined.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study primarily reviews the studies that use Arbitrage Pricing Theory by separating the risk factors into two main groups as country-level factors and firm-level factors.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Following this, this study examines the stock return determinants of emerging countries in two separate models; macro model and micro model to provide an empirical evidence on both country effects and firm-specific effects separately.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:For micro model, 5 key firm specific variables, beta, book-to-market equity, earnings-to-price ratio, size and leverage are examined.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:CAPM · Arbitraj Fiyatlama Teorisi · Risk Faktörleri

Abstract

This study primarily reviews the studies that use Arbitrage Pricing Theory by separating the risk factors into two main groups as country-level factors and firm-level factors. Following this, this study examines the stock return determinants of emerging countries in two separate models; macro model and micro model to provide an empirical evidence on both country effects and firm-specific effects separately. The macro model is constructed to examine the relative importance of country effect in explaining cross-sectional stock variations. For that purpose the significance of 4 key macroeconomic variables –fundamental country characteristics-; money supply, exchange rate, inflation rate, and total reserve are tested. For micro model, 5 key firm specific variables, beta, book-to-market equity, earnings-to-price ratio, size and leverage are examined.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın öncelikli amacı Arbitraj Fiyatlama Teorisi’nde kullanılan ülke düzeyinde ve işletme düzeyinde şeklinde iki gruba ayrılmış risk faktörlerini gözden geçirmektir. Bu bağlamda literatürde temel teşkil eden ve bu değişkenleri kullanan çalışmaların gözden geçirilmesi ve özeti yapılacaktır. Çalışmanın ikinci ve literatüre en önemli katkı sağlayacak bölümü ise ülke ve işletme düzeyindeki faktörlerin hisse senedi fiyatlamalarında gerçekten etkin rol oynayıp oynamadığını büyük bir veri seti ile tespit eden ampirik kısım oluşturacaktır. Bu kısımda yalnızca ülke düzeyinde değişkenlerin kullanıldığı makro model ve yalnızca işletme düzeyinde değişkenlerin kullanıldığı mikro model olmak üzere ki model oluşturulacaktır.

🔖

Cite This Article

EMİN, D. (2018). A Review of Country-level and Firm-level Factors in Arbitrage Pricing Theory and A Quick Test with Large Dataset. SOSYAL BİLİMLER METİNLERİ, Cilt: 2018 - Sayı: 2, 102–117. https://ajindex.com/articles/421699

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Abdalla, I. & Murinde, V. (1997). Exchange rate and stock price interactions in emerging financial markets: evidence on India, Korea, Pakistan and the Philippines, Applied Financial Economics, 7, 25-35.
  2. Aggarwal, R., Ramesh, P. & Takto, H. (1990). Regularities in Tokyo Stock Exchange security returns: P/E, size and seasonal influences. Journal of Financial Research, 13, 249-263.
  3. Ajayi, R. A. & Mougoue, M. (1996). On the dynamic relation between stock prices and exchange rates. Journal of Financial Research, 19, 193–207.
  4. Ando, A. & Modigliani, F. (1963). The ‘life-cycle’ hypothesis of saving: aggregate implications and tests. American Economic Review, 53(1), 55–84.
  5. Bahmani, M. & Sohrabian, A. (1992). Stock prices and the effective exchange rate of the dollar. Applied Economics, 24, 459–464.
  6. Bailey, W. & Chung P. (1996). Risk and return in the Philippine Equity Market: A Multifactor rxploration. Journal of Pacific-Basin, 4, 197-218.
  7. Banz, M. & Rolf, W. (1981). The relationship between return and market value of stocks. Journal of Financial Economics, 9(4), 3-18.
  8. Barber, B. M. & Lyon, D. J. (1997). Firm size, book-to-market ratio, and security returns: A holdout sample of financial firms. Journal of Finance, 52, 875-884.
  9. Basu, S. (1977). Investment performance of common stocks in relation to the price earnings ratios: A test of the Efficient Market Hypothesis. The Journal of Finance, 32(3), 663-682.
  10. Basu, S. (1983). The relationship between earnings yield, market value, and return for NYSE common stocks: Further evidence. Journal of Financial Economics, 12(6), 129-156.
  11. Beenstock, M. & Chan, K. (1988). Economic forces in the London Stock Market. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 50, 27-39.
  12. Bernanke, B.S. & Kuttner, K. (2005). What explains the stock market’s reaction to federal reserve policy? Journal of Finance, 60(3), 1221-1257.
  13. Bessler, W. & Opfer, H. (2003). Empirische untersuchungen zur bedeutung makro¨okonomischer faktoren f¨ur aktienrenditen am deutschen kapitalmarkt. Financial Markets and Portfolio Management, 17, 412–436.
  14. Bhandari, L. (1988). Debt/Equity Ratio and expected common stock returns: Empirical evidence. Journal of Finance, 41(14), 779-793.
  15. Black, F. (1972). Capital market equilibrium with restricted borrowing. Journal of Business, 45(3), 444-455.
  16. Black, F., Jensen, M. C. & Scholes, M. S. (1972). The capital asset pricing model: Some empirical tests. Studies in the Theory of Capital Markets, ed. Jensen M. C., Praeger, New York, 79