Journals / Pamukkale Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 9

Literature review on success factors and methods used in warehouse location selection

Depo yeri seçiminde kullanılan başarı faktörleri ve yöntemler üzerine bir literatür araştırması

Pages
1062–1070
Publication Date
2019-12-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results of the study, the most used methods in warehouse location selection are multi-criteria decision making methods such as AHP, ANP and TOPSIS; and the most commonly used success factor is determined as the cost-based factors.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The fact that the production and consumption amounts are different from each other gives a dynamic feature to the concept of storage.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In addition, an effective storage activity hinges upon the selection of the right warehouse location that takes into account capital and labor investments; minimizes the transportation cost and time.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the results of the study, the most used methods in warehouse location selection are multi-criteria decision making methods such as AHP, ANP and TOPSIS; and the most commonly used success factor is determined as the cost-based factors.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Depo · Yer seçimi · Literatür araştırması

Abstract

The fact that the production and consumption amounts are different from each other gives a dynamic feature to the concept of storage. In addition, an effective storage activity hinges upon the selection of the right warehouse location that takes into account capital and labor investments; minimizes the transportation cost and time. The aim of this study is to investigate the preliminary researches in the selection of the warehouse location selection and to present information on which success factors and methods are preferred. Within this scope, many academic studies have been examined by filtering various databases. According to the results of the study, the most used methods in warehouse location selection are multi-criteria decision making methods such as AHP, ANP and TOPSIS; and the most commonly used success factor is determined as the cost-based factors.

Özet

Dünya üzerinde üretim ve tüketim miktarlarının birbirlerinden farklı olması depolama kavramına dinamik bir özellik kazandırmaktadır. Ayrıca etkin bir depolama faaliyeti; sermaye ve işçilik yatırımlarını dikkate alacak, taşıma maliyet ve zamanını minimize edecek doğru depo yerinin seçilmesinden geçmektedir. Bu doğrultuda çalışmanın amacı, depo yeri seçiminde yapılmış olan öncül araştırmaların incelenmesi ve depo yer seçiminde hangi başarı faktörleri ve yöntemlerin tercih edildiğine dair bir bilgi sunmaktır. Bu amaç kapsamında çok sayıda akademik çalışma çeşitli veri tabanları süzülerek incelenmiştir. Çalışmanın sonuçlarına göre depo yer seçiminde en fazla kullanılan yöntemler AHP, ANP ve TOPSIS’in başını çektiği Çok Kriterli Karar Verme yöntemleri, en çok kullanılan başarı faktörü ise Maliyet içerikli faktörler olarak belirlenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

GERGİN, R. E., PEKER, İ. (2019). Literature review on success factors and methods used in warehouse location selection. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 9, 1062–1070. https://ajindex.com/articles/42140

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Onut S, Tuzkaya UR, Dogac B. “A particle swarm optimization algorithm for the multiple-level warehouse layout design problem”. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 54, 783-799, 2008. Keskin MH. Lojistik Tedarik Zinciri Yönetimi. 2. Baskı.
  2. Ankara, Türkiye, 2008.
  3. Çakmak E., Günay NS, Aybakan G, Tanyaş M. “Determining the size and design of flow type and U type warehouses”. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 58, 1425-1433, 2012.
  4. Maharjan R, Hanaoka S. “Warehouse location determination for humanitarian relief distribution in nepal”. Transportation Research Procedia, 25, 1151-1163, 2017.
  5. Korpela J, Tuominen M. “A decision aid in warehouse site selection”. International Journal of Production Economics, 45, 169-180, 1996.
  6. Hidaka K, Okano H. “Simulation-Based approach to the warehouse location problem for a large-scale real instance”. Proceedings of the 1997
  7. Winter Simulation Conference, Atlanta, Georgia, USA, 1997.
  8. Kratica J, Tosic D, Filipovic V. “Solving the Uncapacitated warehouse location problem by SGA with Add-Heuristic”. XV. ECPD International Conference on Material Handling and Warehousing, Belgrade, Serbia, 09-10 December 1998.
  9. Vlachopoulou M, Silleos G, Manthou V. “Geographic information systems in warehouse site selection decisions”. International Journal of Production Economics, 71, 205-212, 2001.
  10. Drezner Z, Scott C, Song JS. “The central warehouse location problem revisited”. IMA Journal of Management Mathematics, 14(4), 321-336, 2003.
  11. Colson G, Dorigo F. “A public warehouses selection support system”. European Journal of Operational Research, 153, 332-349, 2004.
  12. Michel L, Van Hentenryck P. “A simple tabu search for warehouse location”. European Journal of Operational Research, 157(3), 576-591, 2004.
  13. Oum P, Park JH. “Multinational firms’ location preference for regional distribution centers: Focus on the northeast asian region”. Transportation Research Part E, 40, 101-121, 2004.
  14. Zevgolis IE, Mavrikos AA, Kaliampakos DC. “Construction, storage capacity and economics of an underground warehousing-logistics center in Athens, Greece”. Tunneling and Underground Space Technology, 19, 165-173, 2004.
  15. Sharma RRK, Berry V. “Developing new formulations and relaxations of single stage capacitated warehouse location problem (SSCWLP): Empirical investigation for assessing relative strengths and computational effort”. European Journal of Operational Research, 177(2), 803-812, 2007.
  16. Liu LB, Berger P, Zeng A, Gerstenfeld A. “Applying the analytic hierarchy pro