SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal of Management Marketing and Logistics / 2018 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1

SUPPLY CHAIN PERFORMANCE: MEASURING THE IMPACT OF SUPPLY CHAIN ORIENTATION AND BRAND EQUITY

Ebru SURUCU
Gul DENKTAS SAKAR
Pages
1–17
Publication Date
2018-03-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Findings- Study results showed that (1) when a supplier has corporate norms and credibility and commitment values, it positively affects supplier’s brand image and brand trust; (2) suppliers’ brand trust has a positive impact on suppliers’ brand equity; (3) suppliers’ brand equity impacts whole supply chain’s cost & service-based performance; (4) both suppliers’ brand image and brand trust impact whole supply chain’s both cost- & service-based and time- & operation-based performance.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose- Aim of this study is twofold.
📊
Key Findings & Data:First, there is a gap about how brand related factors affects supply chain performance, this study aims to fulfill this gap by extending existing brand theory with a new setting.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Findings- Study results showed that (1) when a supplier has corporate norms and credibility and commitment values, it positively affects supplier’s brand image and brand trust; (2) suppliers’ brand trust has a positive impact on suppliers’ brand equity; (3) suppliers’ brand equity impacts whole supply chain’s cost & service-based performance; (4) both suppliers’ brand image and brand trust impact whole supply chain’s both cost- & service-based and time- & operation-based performance.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Brand equity · brand image · brand trust

Abstract

Purpose- Aim of this study is twofold. First, there is a gap about how brand related factors affects supply chain performance, this study aims to fulfill this gap by extending existing brand theory with a new setting. Second, this study also aims to reveal the perspectives of manufacturing companies regarding their most important suppliers in terms of supply orientation, suppliers’ brand equity and supply chain performance. Methodology- For this purpose, an online questionnaire is prepared and sent to supply chain managers of manufacturing companies in Aegean region. Findings- Study results showed that (1) when a supplier has corporate norms and credibility and commitment values, it positively affects supplier’s brand image and brand trust; (2) suppliers’ brand trust has a positive impact on suppliers’ brand equity; (3) suppliers’ brand equity impacts whole supply chain’s cost & service-based performance; (4) both suppliers’ brand image and brand trust impact whole supply chain’s both cost- & service-based and time- & operation-based performance. Conclusion- This research examines how suppliers' supply chain orientation and brand equity affects overall supply chain performance in the context of manufacturing companies; while, contributing our understanding of brand in B2B service settings. For this purpose, a scale has been developed considering supply chain orientation, brand equity, and supply chain performance.

🔖

Cite This Article

SURUCU, E., SAKAR, G. D. (2018). SUPPLY CHAIN PERFORMANCE: MEASURING THE IMPACT OF SUPPLY CHAIN ORIENTATION AND BRAND EQUITY. Journal of Management Marketing and Logistics, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1, 1–17. https://ajindex.com/articles/421037

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Aaker, D.A., 1991. Managing Brand Equity: Capitalizing on the Value of a Brand Name. New York, NY: The Free Press.
  2. Aaker, D.A., 1996. Measuring brand equity across products and markets, California Management Review, 38(3), 102-120.
  3. Aaker, D., 2003. The power of the branded differentiator, Sloan Management Review, 83-87.
  4. Anderson, J.C., & Narus, J.A., 1990. A model of distributor firm and manufacturer firm working partnership, Journal of Marketing, 54(1), 4258. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1252172
  5. Ashley, C., and Leonard, H.A., 2009. Betrayed by the buzz? Convert content and consumer-brand relationships, Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 28(2), 212-220. https://doi.org/10.1509/jppm.28.2.212
  6. Bendixen, M., Bukasa, K.A., and Abratt, R., 2004. Brand equity in the business-to-business market, Industrial Marketing Management, 33(5), 371-380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2003.10.001
  7. Berry, L.L. 1995. Relationship marketing of services: growing interest, emerging perspectives, Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, 23(4), 236-245.
  8. Bhatnagar, R., and Sohal, A.S., 2005. Supply chain competitiveness: measuring the impact of location factors, uncertainty and manufacturing practices, Technovation, 25, 443-456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2003.09.012
  9. Brewer, P.C., and Speh, T.W., 2000. Using the balanced scorecard to measure supply chain performance, Journal of Business Logistics, 21(1), 75- 93. Bucklin, L.P., and Sengupta, S., 1993. Organizing successful co-marketing alliances, Journal of Marketing, 57,32-46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1252025
  10. Buil, I., de Charnatony, L., and Martinez, E., 2008. A cross-national validation of the consumer-based bran equity scale, Journal of Product & Brand Management, 17(6), 384-392. https://doi.org/10.1108/10610420810904121
  11. Cannon, J.P., and Perreault, Jr., W.D., 1999. Buyer-seller relationships in ibusiness markets, Journal of Marketing Research, 36, 439-460. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151999
  12. Carpenter, G., and Nakamoto, K., 1989. Consumer preference formation and pioneering advantage, Journal of Marketing Research, 26(3), 285-298. https://doi.org/10.2307/3172901
  13. Carroll, B.A., and Ahuvia, A.C., 2006. Some antecedents and outcomes of brand love, Market Letter, 17, 79-89.
  14. Celi, L., and Eagle, J., 2008. Ten Megatrends in B2B Marketing, The Economist –Economist Intelligence Unit. Chaudhuri, A., and Holbrook, B.M., 2001. The chain of effects from brand trust and brand affects to brand performance: the role of bra