Journals / Düzce Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi / 2011 / Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 3

Biomaterials As Bone Replacements, Part 2: Synthetic grafts and Xenografts

Kemik Yerine Geçen Biyomateryaller 2. Kısım: Hayvansal ve Sentetik Greftler

Pages
46–52
Publication Date
2011-12-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this review,we are presenting the bone grafts of animal and synthetic origin with an emphasis on their areasof usage

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Bone grafts are used in an increasing frequency in orthopedic surgery, neurosurgery and plasticsurgery to increase bone union and to fill bone defects and to obtain structural stiffness in bonedeficiencies.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The grafts used today are of human, animal and synthetic origin.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this review,we are presenting the bone grafts of animal and synthetic origin with an emphasis on their areasof usage
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:kemik grefti · otogreft · allogreft

Abstract

Bone grafts are used in an increasing frequency in orthopedic surgery, neurosurgery and plasticsurgery to increase bone union and to fill bone defects and to obtain structural stiffness in bonedeficiencies. The grafts used today are of human, animal and synthetic origin. In this review,we are presenting the bone grafts of animal and synthetic origin with an emphasis on their areasof usage

Özet

Kemik greftleri Ortopedi, Beyin cerrahisi, Plastik cerrahi gibi branşlarda kaynamanınarttırılması, doku boşluklarının doldurulması, kemik eksikliklerinde yapısal güç sağlanmasıamacı ile giderek artan sıklıkta kullanılmaktadır. Günümüzde kullanılan greftler insan kaynaklı,hayvan kaynaklı ve sentetik greftler olarak çeşitlenmektedir. Okuyacağınız bu derlemedehayvansal ve sentetik kaynaklı kemik greftlerini ve bunların başlıca kullanım alanlarını sunmayaçalıştık

🔖

Cite This Article

KÖMÜRCÜ, E., İNANMAZ, M. E., IŞIK, C., AKAN, B., KÖSE, K. Ç. (2011). Biomaterials As Bone Replacements, Part 2: Synthetic grafts and Xenografts. Düzce Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 3, 46–52. https://ajindex.com/articles/420746

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Paderni S, Terzi S, Amendola L. Major bone defect treatment with an osteoconductive bone substitute. Musculoskelet Surg. 93:89-96, 2009.
  2. Develioglu H, Unver Saraydin S, Kartal U. The bone-healing effect of a xenograft in a rat calvarial defect model. Dent Mater J. 4:396-400, 2009.
  3. Hamadouche M, Sedel L. Ceramics in orthopaedics. J Bone Joint Surg Br 8:1095-9, 2000.
  4. Navarro M, Michiardi A, Castaño O, Planell JA. Biomaterials in orthopaedics. J R Soc Interface. 5:1137-58, 2008.
  5. Korkusuz P, Korkusuz F. Hard tissue-biomaterial interactions. In: Yaszemski, Trantolo DJ, Lewandrowski KU, Hasirci V, Altobelli DE, Wise DL. (ed). Biomaterials in Orthopedics. Newyork. Basel, Marcel Dekker, Inc. p.1-40, 2004. Chow LC. Next generation calcium phosphate-based biomaterials. Dent Mater J. 28:1-10, 2009.
  6. Shors E, Holmes R. Bone formation in porous hydroxyapatite obtained from human biopsies. Bioceramics 6:375-79, 1993.
  7. Nakase T, Fujii M, Myoui A, Tamai N, Hayaishi Y, Ueda T, Hamada M, Kawai H, Yoshikawa H. Use of hydroxyapatite ceramics for treatment of nonunited osseous defect after open fracture of lower limbs. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 129:1539- 47, 2009. Bucholz RW. Nonallograft osteoconductive bone graft substitutes. Clin Orthop 395:44-52, 2002.
  8. Plominski J, Watral Z, Kwiatkowski K. Dynamic testing of bone grafts. Acta Bioeng Biomech. 10:27-31, 2008. LeGeros RZ. Properties of osteoconductive biomaterials: calcium phosphates.Clin Orthop. 395:81-98, 2002.
  9. Fini M, Giavaresi G, Aldini NN, Torricelli P, Botter R, Beruto D, Giardino R. A bone substitute composed of polymethylmethacrylate and alpha-tricalcium phosphate: results in terms of osteoblast function and bone tissue formation. Biomaterials. 23:4523-31, 2002.
  10. Gitelis S, Piasecki P, Turner T, Haggard W, Charters J, Urban R. Use of a calcium sulfate-based bone graft substitute for benign bone lesions. Orthopedics. 24:162-6, 2001.
  11. Kelly CM, Wilkins RM, Gitelis S, Hartjen C, Watson JT, Kim PT. The use of a surgical grade calcium sulfate as a bone graft substitute: results of a multicenter trial.Clin Orthop 382:42-50, 2001. Blaha D Calcium sulfate bone-void filler. Orthopedics 21:1017-19, 1998.
  12. McKee M, Schemitsch E, Wild L, et al. Bone substitute with tobramycin heals non-infected nonunions. Orthop Today 20:1- 2, 2000.
  13. Van den Vreken NM, Pieters IY, Declercq HA, Cornelissen MJ, Verbeeck RM. Characterization of calcium phosphate cements modified by addition of amorphous calcium phosphate. Acta Biomater. 6:617-25, 2010. Bau