SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Pamukkale Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 3

Calcium carbonate precipitation by urease and carbonic anhydrase positive bacteria

Üreaz ve karbonik anhidraz pozitif bakteriler tarafindan kalsiyum karbonat çökelimi

Naime Nur BOZBEYOĞLU
Tuğba ŞENSOY CANDOĞAN
Şevki ARSLAN
Buket KABALAY
Ömer BOZKAYA
Erdal AKYOL
Nazime MERCAN DOĞAN
Pages
513–518
Publication Date
2020-06-08
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Although, S. pasteurii ATCC 6453 was better option for microbial calcium carbonate precipitation (MCP) at higher temperature, by B. aerius U2 at lower temperature (

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In present study, CaCO3 precipitation was examined in two ureolytic bacteria.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Bacillus aerius U2 and Sporosarcina pasteurii ATCC 6453 were used as test organisms.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Although, S. pasteurii ATCC 6453 was better option for microbial calcium carbonate precipitation (MCP) at higher temperature, by B. aerius U2 at lower temperature (
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Çökelim · Kalsiyum karbonat · Karbonik anhidraz

Abstract

In present study, CaCO3 precipitation was examined in two ureolytic bacteria. Bacillus aerius U2 and Sporosarcina pasteurii ATCC 6453 were used as test organisms. The determination of urease and carbonic anhydrase enzyme activities were also determined. For further confirmation of the calcium carbonate mineral type produced by bacteria, XRD, SEM and EDX analysis were done. Strain U2 produced calcite and vaterite. In S. pasteurii ATCC 6453, only vaterite was found. The enzyme activity studies showed that both urease and carbonic anhydrase activities was 2-50-fold higher in S. pasteurii ATCC 6453 than B. aerius U2. Although, S. pasteurii ATCC 6453 was better option for microbial calcium carbonate precipitation (MCP) at higher temperature, by B. aerius U2 at lower temperature (

Özet

Bu çalışmada, iki üreolitik bakteride CaCO3 çökelimi araştırılmıştır. Test organizması olarak Bacillus aerius U2 ve Sporosarcina pasteurii ATCC 6453 türleri kullanılmıştır. Bunların yanında, bakterilerin üreaz ve karbonik anhidraz enzim aktiviteleri de tespit edilmiştir. Bakteriler tarafından üretilen kalsiyum karbonatın mineral tipi konformasyonu için XRD, SEM ve EDX analizleri gerçekleştirilmiştir. B. aerius U2 suşu kalsit ve vaterit üretmiştir. S. pasteurii ATCC 6453 suşunda sadece vaterit bulunmuştur. Enzim aktivitesi çalışmalarının sonuçlarına göre S. pasteurii ATCC 6453, B. aerius U2’den 2-50 kat daha fazla aktivite göstermiştir. Yüksek sıcaklıklarda kalsiyum karbonat çökelimi için S. pasteurii ATCC 6453 türü tercih edilebilirken, daha geniş iklim bölgelerini kapsayan düşük sıcaklıklarda(

🔖

Cite This Article

BOZBEYOĞLU, N. N., CANDOĞAN, T. Ş., ARSLAN, Ş., KABALAY, B., BOZKAYA, Ö., AKYOL, E., DOĞAN, N. M. (2020). Calcium carbonate precipitation by urease and carbonic anhydrase positive bacteria. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 3, 513–518. https://ajindex.com/articles/42071

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Henze J, Randall DG. “Microbial induced calcium carbonate precipitation at elevated pH values (>11) using Sporosarcina pasteurii”. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 6(4), 5008-5013, 2018.
  2. Canakci H, Sidik W, Kilic IH. “Effect of bacterial calcium carbonate precipitation on compressibility and shear strength of organic soil”. Soils and Foundations, 55(5), 1211-1221, 2015.
  3. Bundur ZB, Amiri A, Ersan YC, Boon N, Belie ND. “Impact of air entraining admixtures on biogenic calcium carbonate precipitation and bacterial viability”. Cement and Concrete Research, 98, 44-49, 2017.
  4. Ferris FG, Phoenix V, Fujita Y, Smith RW. “Kinetics of calcite precipitation induced by ureolytic bacteria at 10 to 20 oC in artificial groundwater”. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 68 (8), 1701-1710, 2004.
  5. Chu J, Stabnikov V, Ivanov V. “Microbially induced calcium carbonate precipitation on surface or in the bulk of soil”. Geomicrobiology Journal, 29 (6), 544-549, 2012.
  6. Amiri A, Azima M, Bundur ZB. “Crack remediation in mortar via biomineralization: Effects of chemical admixtures on biogenic calcium carbonate”. Construction and Building Materials, 190, 317-325, 2018.
  7. Ksara M, Newkirk R, Langroodi SK, Althoey F, Sales, Schauer CL, Farnam Y. “Microbial damage mitigation strategy in cementitious materials exposed to calcium chloride”. Construction and Building Materials, 195, 1-9, 2019.
  8. Qabany A, Soga K, Santamarina C. “Factors affecting efficiency of microbially induced calcite precipitation”. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 138 (8), 992-1001, 2012.
  9. Li Q, Zhang B, Ge Q, Yang X. “Calcium carbonate precipitation induced by calcifying bacteria in culture experiments: Influence of the medium on morphology and mineralogy”. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation, 134, 83-92, 2018.
  10. Zhu T, Lin Y, Lub X, Dittrich M. “Assessment of cyanobacterial species for carbonate precipitation on mortar surface under different conditions”. Ecological Engineering, 120, 154-163, 2018.
  11. Schwantes-Cezario N, Medeiros LP, De Oliveira Jr. AG, Nakazato G, Kobayashi RKT, Toralles BM. “Bioprecipitation of calcium carbonate induced by Bacillus subtilis isolated in Brazil”. International Biodeterioration and Biodegradation, 123, 200-205, 2017.
  12. Zhuang D, Yan H, Tucker ME, Zhao H, Han Z, Zhao Y, Sun B, Li D, Pan J, Zhao Y, Meng R, Shan G, Zhang X, Tang R. “Calcite precipitation induced by Bacillus cereus MRR2 cultured at different Ca2+ concentrations: Further insights into bioti