SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Düzce Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 2

Comparison of Type I Diabetes Frequency in Children with Cesarean and Normal Vaginal Delivery

Sezaryen ve Normal Vajinal Doğan Çocuklarda Tip 1 Diyabet Sıklığının Karşılaştırılması

İbrahim Ethem ŞAHİN
Ceyhan HACIOĞLU
Merve ALPAY
Önder KİLİÇASLAN
Pages
114–118
Publication Date
2020-08-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this study, we aimed to investigate the frequency of type 1 diabetes mellitus in children born by cesarean delivery or normal vaginal delivery, considering that there may be an association between mode of birth way and diabetes mellitus.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The effect of type 1 diabetes mellitus over the world is rising day after day.
📊
Key Findings & Data:There are controversial results that may be related to cesarean delivery that has become widespread in recent years and the risk of type 1 diabetes mellitus.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this study, we aimed to investigate the frequency of type 1 diabetes mellitus in children born by cesarean delivery or normal vaginal delivery, considering that there may be an association between mode of birth way and diabetes mellitus.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Sezaryen doğum · Normal vajinal doğum · Tip 1 diyabet

Abstract

Aim: The effect of type 1 diabetes mellitus over the world is rising day after day. There are controversial results that may be related to cesarean delivery that has become widespread in recent years and the risk of type 1 diabetes mellitus. In this study, we aimed to investigate the frequency of type 1 diabetes mellitus in children born by cesarean delivery or normal vaginal delivery, considering that there may be an association between mode of birth way and diabetes mellitus.

Özet

Amaç: Tip 1 diyabetin dünya üzerindeki etkisi her geçen gün artmaktadır. Son yıllarda yaygınlaşan sezaryen doğum ve tip 1 diyabet riski arasında ilişkili olabilecek tartışmalı sonuçlar vardır. Bu çalışmada, doğum şekli ve tip 1 diyabet arasında bir bağlantı var olduğunu düşünerek sezaryen ve normal vajinal yolla doğan çocuklarda tip 1 diyabet görülme sıklığının araştırılması amaçlandı.

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞAHİN, İ. E., HACIOĞLU, C., ALPAY, M., KİLİÇASLAN, Ö. (2020). Comparison of Type I Diabetes Frequency in Children with Cesarean and Normal Vaginal Delivery. Düzce Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 2, 114–118. https://ajindex.com/articles/420632

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. American Diabetes Association. Report of the expert committee on the diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 1997;20(7):1183-97.
  2. Sheetz MJ, King GL. Molecular understanding of hyperglycemia’s adverse effects for diabetic complications. JAMA. 2002;288(20):2579-88.
  3. Melendez-Ramirez LY, Richards RJ, Cefalu WT. Complications of type 1 diabetes. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 2010;39(3):625-40. International Diabetes Federation. IDF Diabetes Atlas. 6th ed. Basel, Switzerland: International Diabetes Federation; 2013.
  4. Cowie CC, Rust KF, Ford ES, Eberhardt MS, Byrd-Holt DD, Li C, et al. Full accounting of diabetes and pre-diabetes in the U.S. population in 1988-1994 and 2005-2006. Diabetes Care. 2009;32(2):287-94.
  5. Xu Y, Wang L, He J, Bi Y, Li M, Wang T, et al. Prevalence and control of diabetes in Chinese adults. JAMA. 2013;310(9):948-59. National Diabetes Data Group. Classification and diagnosis of diabetes mellitus and other categories of glucose intolerance. Diabetes. 1979;28(12):1039-57. American Diabetes Association. Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2014;37(Suppl 1):S81-90. American Diabetes Association. Type 2 diabetes in children and adolescents. Diabetes Care. 2000;23(3):381-9.
  6. Stjernholm YV, Petersson K, Eneroth E. Changed indications for cesarean sections. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2010;89(1):49-53. Belizán JM, Althabe F, Cafferata ML. Health consequences of the increasing caesarean section rates. Epidemiology. 2007;18(4):485-6.
  7. Lavender T, Hofmeyr GJ, Neilson JP, Kingdon C, Gyte GML. Cesarean section for non-medical reasons at term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;3:CD004660. Silver RM, Landon MB, Rouse DJ, Leveno KJ, Spong CY, Thom EA, et al. Maternal morbidity associated with multiple repeat cesarean deliveries. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;107(6):1226-32.
  8. Levine EM, Ghai V, Barton JJ, Strom CM. Mode of delivery and the risk for respiratory diseases in newborns. Obstet Gynecol. 2001;97(3):439-42.
  9. Cardwell CR, Stene LC, Joner G, Cinek O, Svensson J, Goldacre MJ, et al. Caesarean section is associated with an increased risk of childhood-onset type 1 diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis of observational studies. Diabetologia. 2008;51(5):726-35. Brandão HV, Vieira GO, de Oliveira Vieira T, Camargos PA, de Souza Teles CA, Guimaraes AC, et al. Increased risk of allergic rhinitis among children delivered by cesarean section: a cross-sectional study nested in a birth cohort. BMC Pediatr. 2016;16:57. Mylonas