SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Düzce Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 2

Assessment of Pancreatitis Complications by Multidetector CT: Review

PANKREATİT KOMPLİKASYONLARININ MULTİDEDEKTÖR BT İLE DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ: DERLEME

Emel Yiğit KARAKAŞ
Ömer KARAKAŞ
Ahmet ŞEKER
Ekrem KARAKAŞ
Pages
70–74
Publication Date
2014-07-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Thepurpose of this article is to summarize pancreatic complications along with contrast-enhancedCT images

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Acute pancreatitis is a frequent disease characterized by sudden upper abdominal pain andvomiting in the emergency setting.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Presentation ranges from a mild-self limiting condition to one with significantmorbidity and mortality in its most severe forms.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Thepurpose of this article is to summarize pancreatic complications along with contrast-enhancedCT images
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Pankreatit · Komplikasyon · Multidedektör BT

Abstract

Acute pancreatitis is a frequent disease characterized by sudden upper abdominal pain andvomiting in the emergency setting. Alcoholism and choledocholithiasis are the most commonetiological factors. Presentation ranges from a mild-self limiting condition to one with significantmorbidity and mortality in its most severe forms. Contrast-enhanced CT has a significant rolein evaluating the extent and evolution of the disease and its associated complications. Thepurpose of this article is to summarize pancreatic complications along with contrast-enhancedCT images

Özet

Akut pankreatit, acil ortamda akut üst karın ağrısı ve kusma ile karakterize sık bir hastalıktır.Alkolizm ve koledokolitiazis en sık etyolojik faktörlerdir. Prezentasyonu hafif-kendi kendinisınırlayan durumdan, en şiddetli formunda önemli morbidite ve mortalite olan duruma kadardeğişir. Kontrastlı BT hastalığın gelişimi, uzanımı ve ilişkili komplikasyonlarındeğerlendirilmesinde önemli bir role sahiptir. Bu makalenin amacı, kontrastlı BT görüntülerieşliğinde pankreatik komplikasyonları özetlemektir

🔖

Cite This Article

KARAKAŞ, E. Y., KARAKAŞ, Ö., ŞEKER, A., KARAKAŞ, E. (2014). Assessment of Pancreatitis Complications by Multidetector CT: Review. Düzce Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 2, 70–74. https://ajindex.com/articles/420479

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Roberts SE, Williams JG, Meddings D, et al. Incidence and case fatality for acute pancreatitis in England: geographical variation, social deprivation, alcohol consumption and aetiologyea record linkage study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2008;28:931-41.
  2. Gurusamy KS, Farouk M, Tweedie JH. UK guidelines for management of acute pancreatitis: is it time to change? Gut. 2005;54:1344-5.
  3. Balthazar EJ, Freeny PC, van Sonnenberg E. Imaging and in- tervention in acute pancreatitis. Radiology. 1994;193:297-306.
  4. Lenhart DK, Balthazar EJ. MDCT of acute mild (nonnec- rotizing) pancreatitis: abdominal complications and fate of fluid collections. AJR. 2008;190:643-649. Whitcomb DC. Clinical practice. Acute pancreatitis. N Engl J Med. 2006;354:2142-50. Bradley III EL. A clinically based classification system for acute pancre-atitis. Summary of the international symposium on acute pancreatitis, Atlanta, Ga, September 11 through 13, 1992. Arch Surg. 1993;128:586-90. Acute Pancreatitis Classification Working Group. Revision of the Atlanta classification of acute pancreatitis,http: // www. pancreasclub. com / resources / Atlanta Classification. pdf (9- 4-2008) [Accessed March 2010].
  5. Balthazar EJ, Robinson DL, Megibow AJ, et al. Acute pancreatitis: value of CT in establishing prognosis. Radiology. 1990;174:331-6. Shankar S, vanSonnenberg E, Silverman SG, et al. Imaging and percutaneous management of acute complicated pancreatitis. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2004;27:567-80.
  6. Larvin M, Chalmers AG, McMahon MJ. Dynamic contrast enhanced computed tomography: a precise technique for identifying and local-ising pancreatic necrosis. BMJ. 1990;300:1425-8.
  7. Johnson CD, Stephens DH, Sarr MG. CT of acute pancreatitis: correlation between lack of contrast enhancement and pancreatic necrosis. AJR. 1991;156:93-5.
  8. Isenmann R, Buchler M, Uhl W, et al. Pancreatic necrosis: an early finding in severe acute pancreatitis. Pancreas. 1993;8:358-61.
  9. Johnson CD, Abu-Hilal M. Persistent organ failure during the first week as a marker of fatal outcome in acute pancreatitis. Gut. 2004;53:1340-4.
  10. Mitchell RM, Byrne MF, Baillie J. Pancreatitis. Lancet. 2003;361:1447-55.
  11. Papachristou GI, Clermont G, Sharma A, et al. Risk and markers of severe acute pancreatitis. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2007;36:277-96.
  12. Buter A, Imrie CW, Carter CR, et al. Dynamic nature of early organ dysfunction determines outcome in acute pancreatitis. Br J Surg 2002;89:298-302.
  13. Papachristou GI, Whitcomb DC. Predictors of severity and necr