Journals / Sigma Mühendislik ve Fen Bilimleri Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 4

THE DETECTION OF SSRs FROM OLIVE (Olea europaea L.) EST COLLECTION BY COMPARING 4 DIFFERENT BIOINFORMATICS SOFTWARES

Pages
763–770
Publication Date
2017-12-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The advantages and disadvantages of the softwares used were determined by comparing the results.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Bioinformatics is an interdisciplinary science that is formed by the combination of computer science and biology.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Over the years, accumulating data were stored carefully, organized, incorporated, provided classification and accessed easily by bioinformatics.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The advantages and disadvantages of the softwares used were determined by comparing the results.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Bioinformatics · EST · SSR

Abstract

Bioinformatics is an interdisciplinary science that is formed by the combination of computer science and biology. Over the years, accumulating data were stored carefully, organized, incorporated, provided classification and accessed easily by bioinformatics. Experimental studies take a long time and are expensive but by means of bioinformatics these studies take a short time and are cheaper. There are two approaches to determine SSRs (Simple Sequence Repeat/Microsatellite) in plants which are analysis of DNA libraries and analysis of EST (Expressed Sequence Tag) collections. Like many studies these two approaches also benefit from bioinformatics. Thus SSRs, which were determined, can be used as markers in genetic diversity studies. In this study, to determine SSRs in olive EST collection that has 3734 EST; SSRIT, SSR Finder, WebSat and IMEx Softwares, which have web-based versions and are easily accessible and utilized, were used. SSR motifs and positions of the EST collection have been determined by means of these four softwares. Each of the four softwares found 2, 3, 4 and 6-nucleotide SSRs. “GA” pattern repeated 6 times, is the most abundant SSR with 324 occurrences. The advantages and disadvantages of the softwares used were determined by comparing the results.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZGENTÜRK, N. Ö., TURAN, G., AYDIN, N. H., ULU, S., ULU, Z. Ö. (2017). THE DETECTION OF SSRs FROM OLIVE (Olea europaea L.) EST COLLECTION BY COMPARING 4 DIFFERENT BIOINFORMATICS SOFTWARES. Sigma Mühendislik ve Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 4, 763–770. https://ajindex.com/articles/419504

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Luscombe NM, Greenbaum D, Gerstein M. What is bioinformatics? An introduction and overview. Yearbook of Medical Informatics 2001; s:83-85
  2. Polat M., Karahan A.G. (2009) “Multidisipliner Yeni Bir Bilim Dalı: Biyoinformatik ve Tıpta Uygulamaları” S.D.Ü. TIp Fak. Derg. 16(3)/ 41-50 [3] Collins F.S., Morgan M. and Patrinos A. The Human Genome Project: Lessons from Large- Scale Biology Science 2003; 300, 286-290
  3. Altschul, S.F., Boguski, M.S., Gish, W. & Wootton, J.C. (1994) “Issues in Searching Molecular Sequence Databases” Nature Genet. 6:119-129 [5] Yurtsever M. (2011) “Zeytin (Olea Europaea L.) Bitkisinden Karbonik Anhidraz Enzimini Kodlayan Genin Klonlanması” s. 20
  4. Rugini E., Biasi R. ve Muleo R., (2000). “Olive (Olea europaea var. sativa) Transformation; Mohan J.S., Minocha S.C., Molecular Biology of Woody Plants, 2, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht. [7]
  5. Ozdemir Ozgentürk N., Oruc F., Sezerman U., Kuçukkural A., Vural Korkut Ş., Toksoz F., Un C. Generation and Analysis of Expressed Sequence Tags from Olea europaea L. Hindawi Publishing Corporation Comparative and Functional Genomics Volume 2010, Article ID 757512
  6. Nagaraj, S.H., Gasser, R.B., Ranganathan S. 2006 A hitchhiker’s guide to expressed sequence tag (EST) analysis. Brıefıngs In Bıoınformatıcs. Vol 8. No 1. 6-21
  7. Matukumalli L.K., Grefenstette J.J., Sonstegard T.S., Van Tassell C.P. EST-PAGE—managing and analyzing EST data, Bioinformatic Applications Note Vol. 20 no. 2 2004, pages 286–288 DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg411
  8. Litt, M. and Luty, J.A. 1989. A hypervariable microsatelllite revealed by in vitro amplification of a dinucleotide repeat within the cardiac muscle actin gene. Am J Hum Genet. 44: 397-401
  9. Devrim K.A ve Kaya N. 2004. Genetik Polimorfizm ve Mikrosatelitler.Kafkas Üniversitesi Veterinerlik Fakültesi Dergisi. 10(2):215-220
  10. Kibar U. 2012. “Ankara Üniversitesi Biyoteknoloji Enstitüsü Est (Expressed Sequence Tag) Koleksiyonlarından Üzüm Mikrosatellit Lokuslarının Tanımlanması” Ankara. s. 3-4 [14] Aktaş P. ve Sönmez Z. “Çiftlik Hayvanlarının Islahında İmleç Yardımlı Seleksiyon (MAS)
  11. Ulusal Zooteknoloji Öğrenci Kongresi 20-22 Mayıs 2011. Aydın
  12. Castillo, A., Budak,H., Varshney, R.K., Dorado, G., Graner, A., Hernandez, P. Transferability and polymorphism of barley EST-SSR markers used for phylogenetic analysis in Hordeum chilense, BMC Plant Biol., 8 (1) (2008), p. 97
  13. Yuan, Y. Lon