Journals / Sigma Mühendislik ve Fen Bilimleri Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 4

ESTIMATION OF SEISMIC DAMAGE PROPAGATION IN A HISTORICAL MASONRY MINARET

Pages
647–666
Publication Date
2017-12-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the nonlinear analysis, earthquake would damage some parts of the elements in the transition segment of the minaret.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aims to investigate the seismic damage propagation in historical stone/brick masonry minaret which was built in 1894 under different ground motions by using calibrated finite element model based on Operational Modal Analysis.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Surveying measurement and material tests were conducted to obtain 3D solid model and mechanical properties of the components of the masonry Minaret.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the nonlinear analysis, earthquake would damage some parts of the elements in the transition segment of the minaret.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Masonry minaret · Operational modal analysis · Ambient Vibration Testing

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the seismic damage propagation in historical stone/brick masonry minaret which was built in 1894 under different ground motions by using calibrated finite element model based on Operational Modal Analysis. Surveying measurement and material tests were conducted to obtain 3D solid model and mechanical properties of the components of the masonry Minaret. First, the initial 3D finite element model of the minaret was analyzed and numerical dynamic characteristics of the minaret were obtained. Then operational modal analysis as an ambient vibration test was employed in order to obtain the experimental dynamic characteristics of the minaret. The initial finite element model of the minaret was calibrated by using the experimental dynamic results. Finally, linear and nonlinear time history analyses of the updated finite element model of the minaret were carried out using the acceleration records of two different earthquakes that occurred in Turkey. Concrete Damage Plasticity model was considered in the nonlinear analyses. The analyses indicate that the results of the linear analyses are not as realistic as the non-linear analysis results. According to the nonlinear analysis, earthquake would damage some parts of the elements in the transition segment of the minaret.

🔖

Cite This Article

ERCAN, E., ARISOY, B., HÖKELEKLİ, E., NUHOĞLU, A. (2017). ESTIMATION OF SEISMIC DAMAGE PROPAGATION IN A HISTORICAL MASONRY MINARET. Sigma Mühendislik ve Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 4, 647–666. https://ajindex.com/articles/419493

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Atamturk, S., Fanning, P. and Boothby, T. (2010), “Traditional and operational modal testing of masonry vaults”, ICE Eng. Comput. Mech. 16(3), 213–223
  2. Bayraktar, A., Altunuşık, A.C., Sevim, B. and Türker, T. (2011), “Seismic response of a historical masonry minaret using a finite element model updated with operational modal testing”, J.Vib. Control, 17(1),129–149
  3. Oliveira, C.S., Çaktı, E., Stengel, D. and Branco, M. (2012), “Minaret behavior under earthquake loading: The case of historical Istanbul”, Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn, 41, 19-39
  4. Hacıefendioğlu, K. and Maraş, E.E. (2016), “Photogrammetry in documentation and ambient vibration test of historical masonry minarets”, Exp Tech, 40, 1527–1537, DOI 10.1007/s40799-016-0137-2
  5. Altunışık, A.C., Adanur, S., Genc, A.F., Gunaydin, M. and Okur, F.Y. (2016), “An investigation of the seismic behaviour of an ancient masonry bastion using non-destructive and numerical methods”, Exp. Mech. 57(2), 245-259, DOI 10.1007/s11340-016-0239-x
  6. Livaoğlu, R., Baştürk, M.H., Doğangün, A. and Serhatoğlu, C. (2016), “Effect of geometric properties on dynamic behavior of historic masonry minaret”, KSCE J. of Civil Eng, 20(6), 2392-2402. DOI 10.1007/s12205-016-0622-2
  7. Demir, A., Nohutcu, H., Ercan, E., Hokelekli, E. and Altıntaş, G. (2016), “Effect of model calibration on seismic behaviour of a historical mosque”, Struct. Eng. Mech, 60(5), 749-760
  8. Fragonara, L.Z., Boscato, G., Ceravolo, R., Russo, S., Ientile, S., Pecorelli, M.L. and Quattrone, A. (2017), “Dynamic investigation on the Mirandola bell tower in post-earthquake scenarios”, Bull Earthquake Eng, 15, 313–337, DOI 10.1007/s10518-016-9970-z
  9. Valente, M. and Milani, G. (2016), “Non-linear dynamic and static analyses on eight historical masonry towers in the North-East of Italy”, Eng. Struct, 114, 241-270
  10. Tiberti, S., Acito, M. and Milani, G. (2016), “Comprehensive FE numerical insight into finale Emilia castle behavior under 2012 Emilia Romagna seismic sequence: Damage causes and seismic vulnerability mitigation hypothesis”, Eng. Struct, 117, 397-421
  11. Resta, M., Fiore, A. and Monaco, P. (2013), “Non-linear finite element analysis of masonry towers by adopting the damage plasticity constitutive model”, Advances in Struct. Eng, 16(5), 2013
  12. Barbieri, G., Biolzi, L., Bocciarelli, M., Fregonese, L. and Frigeri, A. (2013), “Assessing the seismic vulnerability of a historical building”, Eng. Struc,, 523–535
  13. ABAQUS V13 (2