Journals / Sigma Mühendislik ve Fen Bilimleri Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 3

POLICY OPTIMIZATION ON A MANUFACTURING COMPANY IN RAPID GROWTH: A CASE STUDY

Pages
693–703
Publication Date
2018-09-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This study shows the potential policies ranked by different multi-criteria decision-making methods for simplifying the decision-making process.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Decision making and policy development is an important process for organizations, since the consequences of given decisions were identified among the major risk factors for organizations’ future.
📊
Key Findings & Data:We integrate the multi-criteria decision making methods into a strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats (SWOT) analysis framework to show the applicability of the proposed method in a ceramic manufacturing firm in Kayseri, Turkey.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This study shows the potential policies ranked by different multi-criteria decision-making methods for simplifying the decision-making process.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Decision optimization · SWOT analysis · policy management

Abstract

Decision making and policy development is an important process for organizations, since the consequences of given decisions were identified among the major risk factors for organizations’ future. This study aims to prove the importance of using combined decision making methods for a successful and strong decision making for managers. We integrate the multi-criteria decision making methods into a strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats (SWOT) analysis framework to show the applicability of the proposed method in a ceramic manufacturing firm in Kayseri, Turkey. Multi-criteria decision making processes were applied for taking quick action for future policies. SWOT analysis is used to optimize potential policies. Then, multi-criteria decision making methods: Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), The Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) and Grey Relational Analysis (GRA) are used in order to determine the importance of each potential policy. Determining the importance of the policies also gives the best solution for each method. This study shows the potential policies ranked by different multi-criteria decision-making methods for simplifying the decision-making process.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜRBÜZ, F., ÖNEN, F. G. (2018). POLICY OPTIMIZATION ON A MANUFACTURING COMPANY IN RAPID GROWTH: A CASE STUDY. Sigma Mühendislik ve Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 3, 693–703. https://ajindex.com/articles/419327

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Aich A, Ghosh S K, (2016) Application of SWOT Analysis for the Selection of Technology for Processing and Disposal of MSW. Procedia Environmental Sciences 35, 209 – 228
  2. Balamuralikrishna R, Dugger J, (1995) SWOT analysis: A management tool for initiating new programs in vocational schools. Journal of Vocational and Technical Education, 12
  3. Chang H, Huang W, (2006) Application of a quantification SWOT analytical method. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, Vol. 43, Issues 1-2, Pages 158-159
  4. Duan Q, Liao T W, (2013) Optimization of replenishment policies for decentralized and centralized capacitated supply chains under various demands. International Journal of Production Economics 142, 194–204
  5. Figuera J, Greco S, Ehrgott M, (2005) Multiple-criteria decision analysis: state of the art surveys. Springer, Berlin
  6. Gürbüz F., (2017), Strategy development with SWOT analysis on manufacturing Companies in rapid growth: a ceramic industry application, 4th World Conference on Business, Economics and Management, WCBEM
  7. Ho W, (2008) Integrated analytic hierarchy process and its applications – a literature review. European Journal of Operational Research. 186(1): 211-228
  8. Houben G, Lenie K, Vanhoof K, (1999) A knowledge-based SWOT-analysis as an instrument for strategic planning in small and medium sized enterprises. Decision Support Systems. 26, 125-135
  9. Kaczmarek M J, (2016) SWOT analysis for Planned Maintenance strategy – a case study. IFAC papers online 49-12, 674-679
  10. Lizarraga M L, Baquedano M T, Cardelle-Elawar M, (2007) Factors that affect decision making: gender and age differences. International Journal of psychology and psychological therapy. Vol. 3 (7). 381-391
  11. Mynttinen I, Hoffmann A, Runge E, Li P, (2015) Smoothing and regularization strategies for optimization of hybrid dynamic systems. Optimization and Engineering 16:541–569
  12. Opricovic S, Tzeng G H, (2004) Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. European Journal of Operational Research 156, 445–455
  13. Pickton D W, Wright S, (1998) What's SWOT in strategic analysis?. Strategic Change, 7 (2), pp. 101-109
  14. Polotski V, Jean-Pierre Kenne J-P, Gharbi A, (2016) Production Policy Optimization in Flexible Manufacturing-Remanufacturing Systems. IFAC-Papers on Line 49-12, 295–300
  15. Polotski V, Kenne J-P, Gharbi A, (2017) Production and set up policy optimization for hybrid manufacturing– remanufacturing system