Journals / Sigma Mühendislik ve Fen Bilimleri Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 1

Separation of co(ii) and se(vi) from a metal and glass industry wastes using graphene oxide-mangane oxide nanocomposite

Pages
29–46
Publication Date
2020-03-27
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

EDS analysis results showed that the graphene oxide has the lowest surface area (32 m2/g) and pore volume (0.11 cm3/g) with an average pore size of 17.3 nm.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Co(II) and Se(VI) were not removed with conventional biological treatments, adsorption and chemical processes.
📊
Key Findings & Data:EDS analysis results showed that the graphene oxide has the lowest surface area (32 m2/g) and pore volume (0.11 cm3/g) with an average pore size of 17.3 nm.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This, reduce the treatment cost by 48% for Se(VI) and by 43% for Co(II).
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Co(II) · Se(VI) · metal industry

Abstract

Co(II) and Se(VI) were not removed with conventional biological treatments, adsorption and chemical processes. Graphene oxide and mangane are excellent adsorbent for heavy metal remediation since their negative surface charge at an alkaline pH. Therefore, in this study, by doping the mangane oxide to the the graphene oxide Co(II) and Se(VI) were removed. XRD pattern of graphene oxide-mangane oxide samples showed that this nanocomposite exhibits poor cristallinity and contained MnO in Birnessite form. EDS analysis results showed that the graphene oxide has the lowest surface area (32 m2/g) and pore volume (0.11 cm3/g) with an average pore size of 17.3 nm. As the pH was increased from 2,0 to 9,0; the negativity of the zeta potantial of graphene oxide- mangane oxide nanocomposite decreased. Tthe narrow O 1s XPS spectra of mangane oxide-graphene oxide nanocomposite contained MnO2.The FTIR spectra of the nanocomposite showed that hydroxyl and carboxyl groups were present. For maximum Se(VI) and Co(II) adsorptions (98% and 98%); the optimum graphene oxide–mangane oxide concentration was found as 4 mg/L, at a pH of 8.9 at 21 0C after 20 min contacting time. The adsorption of Co(II) and Se(VI) was explained by the pseudo-first order kinetic model while the maximum adsorption capacities of Co(II) and Se(VI) were 256 mg/g and 289 mg/g, respectively. Graphene oxide–mangane oxide nanocomposite was reused with the percentages of 86% and 90% for Co(II) and Se(VI), respectively after four sequential utilisation. This, reduce the treatment cost by 48% for Se(VI) and by 43% for Co(II).

🔖

Cite This Article

AKÇAĞLAR, S. (2020). Separation of co(ii) and se(vi) from a metal and glass industry wastes using graphene oxide-mangane oxide nanocomposite. Sigma Mühendislik ve Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 1, 29–46. https://ajindex.com/articles/419286

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Lawson S., Macy J.M., (1995) Bioremediation of selenite inoil refinerywastewater, Appl.Microbiol. Biotechnol. 43 (4) 762–765
  2. Peak D., (2006) Adsorption mechanisms of selenium oxyanions at the aluminum oxide/water interface, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 303 337–345
  3. Das J., Das D., Dash G.P., Parida K.M., (2002) Studies on Mg/Fe hydrotalcite-likecompound (HTlc). I. Removal of inorganic selenite (SeO32−) from aqueous medium, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 251 (1) 26–32
  4. Duc M., Lefèvre G., Fédoroff M., (2006) Sorption of selenite ions on hematite, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 298 (2) 556–563
  5. Afkhami A., (2002) Kinetic-spectrophotometric determination of selenium in natural water after preconcentration of elemental selenium on activated carbon, Talanta 58, 311–317
  6. El-Shafey E.I., (2007) Removal of Se(IV) from aqueous solution using sulphuric acidtreated peanut shell, J. Environ. Manage. 84, 620–627
  7. Martínez M., Giménez J., Pablo J., Rovira M., Duro L., (2006) Sorption of selenium (IV) and selenium (VI) ontomagnetite, Appl. Surf. Sci. 252 (10) 3767–3773
  8. Wan S., Wu J., He F., Zhou S., Wang R., Gao B., Chen J., (2017) Hosphate removal by leadexhausted bioadsorbents simultaneously achieving lead stabilization, Chemosphere 168, 748–755
  9. Wan S, Ding W, Wu J, Gu Y, He F., (2018) Manganese oxide nanoparticles impregnated graphene oxide aggregates for cadmium and copper remediation, Chemical Engineering Journal, 350, 1135-114
  10. Swann S.Jr., Appel E.G., Kistler S.S., (1934) Thoria aerogel catalyst: aliphatic esters to ketones Ind, Eng. Chem. 26, 1014–1014
  11. Adebajo M., Frost R., Kloprogge J., Carmody O., Kokot S., (2003) Porous materials for oil spill cleanup: a review of synthesis and absorbing properties, J. Porous Mater. 10 159–170
  12. Long J.W., Fischer A.E., McEvoy T.M., Bourg M.E., Lytle J.C., Rolison D., (2008) Selflimiting electropolymerization en route to ultrathin, conformal polymer coatings for energy storage applications, PMSE Prepr. 99 772–773
  13. Latthe S.S., Digambar Y.N., Rao A.V., (2009) TMOS based water repellent silica thin films by co-precursor method using TMES as a hydrophobic agent, Appl. Surf. Sci. 255 3600–3604
  14. Fan H., Anderson P., (2005) Copper and cadmium removal by Mn oxide-coated granular activated carbon, Sep. Purif. Technol. 45, 61–67
  15. Boujelben J.B.N., Elouear Z., (2009) Removal of lead (II) Ions from aqueous solutions using manganese oxide-coated adsorbents: characterization and kine