Journals / Sigma Mühendislik ve Fen Bilimleri Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 2

NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF FLOW ON A SIPHON SPILLWAY AND INVESTIGATION OF THE EFFECT OF A BOTTOM/OUTLET ANGLE ON HYDRAULIC PARAMETERS

Pages
279–290
Publication Date
2016-06-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results showed that mean velocity at a spillway downstream at a 60° outlet angle was higher than other outlet angles in all discharges.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Spillways are the main hydraulic structures used to drain excess flow volume of dam reservoirs.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The cup-shaped damper radial angles were 30, 45 and 60 degrees.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results showed that mean velocity at a spillway downstream at a 60° outlet angle was higher than other outlet angles in all discharges.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Siphon spillway · numerical simulation · absolute pressure

Abstract

Spillways are the main hydraulic structures used to drain excess flow volume of dam reservoirs. It is essential to study siphon overflows due to simple geometric structure, automatic function and acceptable capacity. Numerical values of overflow siphon hydraulic parameters were calculated in this study. For this purpose, the geometrical domain of the solution was designed using GAMBIT Software, and the numerical simulation of flow was carried out using Fluent Software. Then, the experimental results were compared with actual results. The data used in the validation section was collected from calculation of absolute pressure in the lower part of the spillway body. After verification of the results, the study mainly aimed to evaluate the effect of a cup-shaped damper angle of the spillway outlet on hydraulic parameters of flow. For this purpose, four groups of hydraulic parameters were used: absolute pressure in the lower part of the spillway body, distribution of velocity at the spillway downstream, energy dissipation and the siphon spillway discharge coefficient. The cup-shaped damper radial angles were 30, 45 and 60 degrees. The results showed that mean velocity at a spillway downstream at a 60° outlet angle was higher than other outlet angles in all discharges. The greatest energy dissipation was observed in the spillway with a 30° outlet angle. In addition, the discharge coefficient increased by increasing the cup-shaped damper angle. However, the discharge coefficient decreased by increasing flow discharge. Absolute pressure on the lower part of spillway body was the only parameter that was not affected by changes in the spillway outlet angle.

🔖

Cite This Article

PAKGAR, F., DANESHFARAZ, R., JOUDI, A. R. (2016). NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF FLOW ON A SIPHON SPILLWAY AND INVESTIGATION OF THE EFFECT OF A BOTTOM/OUTLET ANGLE ON HYDRAULIC PARAMETERS. Sigma Mühendislik ve Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 2, 279–290. https://ajindex.com/articles/419283

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Babaeyan-Koopaei, K., Valentine, E.M., Alan Ervine, D. (2002) Case study on hydraulic performance of Brent Reservoir siphon spillway. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering. ASCE, 128(6): 562-67
  2. Chamani, M R., Dehghani, A A., Beirami, M K., Gholipour, R. (2009) Fluid Mechanics, Isfahan Industrial University’s Publication, Iran. (In Persian)
  3. Daneshfaraz, R. (2010) Fluid Mechanics. Maragheh University’s Publication, Iran. (In Persian)
  4. Daneshfaraz, R., Nikpour, V., Sadeghi, H. (2013) Simulation of hydraulic problems. Amidi Publications, Tabriz, Iran. (In Persian)
  5. Dornack, S., Horlacher, H. B. (1999) Hydraulic model experiments for the siphon spillway of the Oker Dam. In 28th IAHR Congress
  6. Ghafourian, A., Mousavi jahromi, H., Shafaee bajestan, M. (2011) Hydraulic of Siphon Spillway by Physical and Computational Fluid Dynamics. World applied sciences journal, 14(8): 1240-1245
  7. Hirt, C.W., Nichols, B.D. (1981) Volume of fluid (VOF) method for the dynamics of free boundaries. J. Computational. Physics, 39: 201-5
  8. Holder, G.K., Schimpff, M.C.E.J. (1999) West Project: analysis of discharge structures. Proc. of Waterpower Conference. Peggy A. Brookshire editor, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA
  9. Houichi, L., Ibrahim, G., Achour, B. (2006) Experiments for the discharge capacity of the siphon spillway having the Creager-Ofitserov profile. Int. J. Fluid Mechanics Res., 5: 395-06
  10. IUT Computational Fluid Dynamics Group Website [11] Jourabloo, M., (2010) Investigation on siphon spillway’s hydraulic. M Sc thesis, Islamic Azad University, Tehran’s Science and Research branch. (In Persian)
  11. Lucke, T., Beecham, S. (2010) Capacity loss in siphonic roof drainage systems due to aeration. Building Research & Information, 38(2), 206-217
  12. Mousavi-Jahromi, S.H., (2011) Simulation of pizometric pressure in dam siphon spillways, World Applied Sciences Journal, 12 (7): 1074-1083
  13. Oliver, G. (1980) The full-scale behavior of air-regulated siphon spillways. In ICE Proceedings (Vol. 69, No. 3, pp. 687-706). Thomas Telford
  14. Patankar S.V. (1980) Numerical heat transfer and fluid flow. Hemisphere Publishing Corporation, Taylor & Francis Group, New York
  15. Roberson, J.A., Cassidy, J.J., Chaudhry, M.H. (1998) Hydraulic engineering, Second edition. John Wiley & Sons, New York, USA
  16. Roberson, J.A., Cassidy, J.J., Chaudhry, M.H. (1998) Hydraulic engineering, Second edition. John Wiley & Sons, New York, USA
  17. Shojaei fard, M H., and Nou