SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Sigma Mühendislik ve Fen Bilimleri Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 3

EFFECT OF DIFFERENT ABUTMENT MATERIALS ON STRESS DISTRIBUTION IN PERIPHERAL BONE AND DENTAL IMPLANT SYSTEM

Merve TERZİ
Yılmaz GÜVERCİN
Sabit Melih ATEŞ
Dursun Murat SEKBAN
Murat YAYLACI
Pages
1495–1507
Publication Date
2021-10-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Generally, it was found that the lowest values were obtained in the group that chrome-cobalt was used as an abutment material.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, the effect of different abutment materials on the stress distribution in bone tissue around the dental implant was investigated using ANSYS packet program based on finite element method.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study aims to examine the stresses, strains and deformations that will occur in the bone, dental implants and abutments with the replacement of abutment materials on the titanium dental implant.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Generally, it was found that the lowest values were obtained in the group that chrome-cobalt was used as an abutment material.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Biomechanics · dental implant · finite element method

Abstract

In this study, the effect of different abutment materials on the stress distribution in bone tissue around the dental implant was investigated using ANSYS packet program based on finite element method. The study aims to examine the stresses, strains and deformations that will occur in the bone, dental implants and abutments with the replacement of abutment materials on the titanium dental implant. Modeling has been prepared in Solidworks program. Titanium was chosen as the dental implant material. Abutment materials were selected as titanium, zirconium, chrome-cobalt and polyetheretherketone. After modeling, necessary load was applied to the abutments and analyzed. This process was repeated for each abutment material. As a result of the analyzes, the stresses, strains and deformations that occurred in the bone, dental implants and abutments were combined into tables. In the conclusion, the differences between the abutment materials were evaluated. Generally, it was found that the lowest values were obtained in the group that chrome-cobalt was used as an abutment material. Therefore, chrome-cobalt can be preferred as an abutment material among all tested materials.

🔖

Cite This Article

TERZİ, M., GÜVERCİN, Y., ATEŞ, S. M., SEKBAN, D. M., YAYLACI, M. (2021). EFFECT OF DIFFERENT ABUTMENT MATERIALS ON STRESS DISTRIBUTION IN PERIPHERAL BONE AND DENTAL IMPLANT SYSTEM. Sigma Mühendislik ve Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 3, 1495–1507. https://ajindex.com/articles/419086

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Ring, M.E., (1995) A Thousand Years of Dental Implants: A Definitive History- Part 1, Compendium Continuing Education Dental 16, 1060-1069
  2. Kaleli, N., Sarac, D., Külünk, S. and Öztürk, Ö., (2018) Effect of Different Restorative Crown and Customized Abutment Materials on Stress Distribution in Single Implants and Peripheral Bone: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis Study, J Prosthet Dent.119(3), 437-445
  3. Tekin, S., Değer,Y. and Demirci, F., (2019) Evaluation of the Use of PEEK Material in Implant-Supported Fixed Restorations by Finite Element Analysis, Niger J Clin Pract 22, 1252-1258
  4. Bankoğlu Güngör, M. and Yılmaz, H., (2016) Evaluation of Stress Distributions Occurring on Zirconia and Titanium Implant-Supported Prostheses: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis, J Prosthet Dent. 116(3), 346-55
  5. Pesqueira, A.A., Goiato, M.C., Filho, H.G., Monteiro, D.R., Santos, D.M., Haddad, M.F., et al. (2014) Use of Stress Analysis Methods to Evaluate the Biomechanics of Oral Rehabilitation with Implants, J Oral Implantol 40, 217-228
  6. Fuh, L.J., Hsu, J.T., Huang, H.L., Chen, M.Y. and Shen, Y.W., (2013) Biomechanical Investigation of Thread Designs and Interface Conditions of Zirconia and Titanium Dental Implants with Bone: Three-Dimensional Numeric Analysis, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 28(2), 64-71
  7. Fish, J. and Belytschko T., (2007) A First Course in Finite Elements. USA. 319s., 15-23
  8. Damlar, İ., Özyılmaz, E., Altan, A. and Özyılmaz, E., (2014) Üç Boyutlu Sonlu Eleman Analiz Yöntemiyle İki Ticari Implant Sisteminin Gerilme Dağılımlarının İncelenmesi, Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri ve Tasarım Dergisi 2(3), 175-180
  9. Jafarian, M., Mirhashemi, F.S. and Emadi, N., (2019) Finite Element Analysis of Stress Distribution Around a Dental Implant with Different Amounts of Bone Loss: An in Vitro Study, Dental and Medical Problems 56(1), 27-32
  10. Djebbar, N., Serier, B. and Bouiadjra, B.A.B., (2018) Stress Distribution of The Variable Dynamic Loading in the Dental Implant: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis, Journal of Biomimetics, Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering 31, 44-52
  11. Robau Porrua, A., Perez Rodriquez, Y., Soris Rodriquez, L.M. and Perez Acosta O., (2020) The Effect of Diameter, Length and Elastic Modulus of a Dental Implant on Stress and Strain Levels in Peri-Implant Bone: A 3D Finite Element Analysis, Bio-Medical Materials and Engineering 30, 541-558
  12. Karaman, H., (201