SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Sigma Mühendislik ve Fen Bilimleri Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 3

CYCLIC BEHAVIOR OF COMPOSITE COLUMN-REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM JOINTS

Fethi ŞERMET
Emre ERCAN
Emin HÖKELEKLİ
Bengi ARISOY
Pages
1427–1445
Publication Date
2021-10-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

On the other hand, analysis result show that the failure controlled by behavior of the beam and joint capacity is depend on the shear capacity of the beam.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this paper, behavior of the concrete encased steel profile composite column-reinforced concrete beam connection representing interior beam-to-column joints under cyclic loading is presented.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The column was designed as concrete encased I steel profile composite column according to Eurocode 4; beam was designed as regular reinforced concrete beam according to local building codes.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:On the other hand, analysis result show that the failure controlled by behavior of the beam and joint capacity is depend on the shear capacity of the beam.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Reinforced concrete joints · composite columns · cyclic loading

Abstract

In this paper, behavior of the concrete encased steel profile composite column-reinforced concrete beam connection representing interior beam-to-column joints under cyclic loading is presented. The column was designed as concrete encased I steel profile composite column according to Eurocode 4; beam was designed as regular reinforced concrete beam according to local building codes. The finite element model of the beam-to-column joint was implemented in ABAQUS and numerical analysis was validated by full scale experimental study. The performance of the concrete encased steel profile composite column-reinforced concrete beam joint was compared to reinforced concrete beam-to-column joint, in order to observe the load carrying capacity and ductility. Ductility level and failure type of the joints were studied and performance of connections are compared. Comparisons were made using load-displacement relation and failure mechanism. It is found that the concrete encased steel composite column-reinforced concrete beam joint exhibited slightly ductile behavior relative to reinforced concrete column-beam joint. On the other hand, analysis result show that the failure controlled by behavior of the beam and joint capacity is depend on the shear capacity of the beam.

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞERMET, F., ERCAN, E., HÖKELEKLİ, E., ARISOY, B. (2021). CYCLIC BEHAVIOR OF COMPOSITE COLUMN-REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM JOINTS. Sigma Mühendislik ve Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 3, 1427–1445. https://ajindex.com/articles/419081

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Lee, S. J. Seismic behavior of steel building structures with composite slabs. Thesis resented to Lehigh University at Bethlehem, Pa, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, (1987)
  2. Lee S-J, Lu L-W. a. Cyclic tests of full-scale composite joint sub assemblages. J Struct Eng, ASCE 1989(8):1977–98
  3. Lee, S.-J., Lu, L.-W., Cyclic load analysis of composite connection sub assemblages. In: Connections in steel structures II, Eds: Bjorhovde, Colson, Hajjar, Stark, AISC, Pittsburgh. pp. 209-216
  4. J. Fan, Q. Li, J. Nie, and H. Zhou, “Experimental study on the seismic performance of 3D joints between concrete-filled square steel tubular columns and composite beams,” Journal of Structural Engineering, vol. 140, no. 12, Article ID 04014094, 2014
  5. Zeng L, Cui Z, Xiao Y, Jin S, and Wu Y. Cyclical Behavior of Concrete-Encased Composite Frame Joints with High Strength Concrete. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015; Article ID 873162
  6. Liao FY, Han LH, Tao Z. Behavior of composite joints with concrete encased CFST columns under cyclic loading: Experiments. Engineering Structures 2014; 59: 745–764
  7. Chen CC, Chen Chien C, Hoang TT. Role of concrete confinement of wide-flange structural steel shape in steel reinforced concrete columns under cyclic loading. Engineering Structures 2016; 110: 79–87
  8. Weng, C.C., Yen, S.I. Comparisons of concrete-encased composite column strength provisions of ACI code and AISC specification. Engineering Structures, 2002; 24: 59–72
  9. Di Sarno, L., Pecce, M.R., Fabbrocino, G. Inelastic response of composite steel and concrete base column connections. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2007; 6:3 819–832
  10. Ellobody, E., Young, B. Numerical simulation of concrete encased steel composite columns. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2011; 67:211–222
  11. Begum M, Driver, R.G. Elwi, A.E. Behaviour of partially encased composite columns with high strength Concrete. Engineering Structures, 2013, 56: 1718–1727
  12. Nzabonimpa, J.D. Hong W-K., Jisoon, K. Nonlinear finite element model for the novel mechanical beam-column joints of precast concrete-based frames, Computers and Structures, 2017, 189:31–48
  13. Ouyang,Y., Kwan, A.K.H., Lo, S.H., Ho, J.C.M. Finite element analysis of concrete-filled steel tube (CFST) columns with circular sections under eccentric load, Engineering Structures, 2017, 148:387–398
  14. Salem, A.S., Taleb, S.A., Tahar, K.A. Static and dyn