Journals / Sigma Mühendislik ve Fen Bilimleri Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 4

DIRECTIONAL-DEFORMATION ANALYSIS OF CYLINDRICAL STEEL WATER TANKS SUBJECTED TO EL-CENTRO EARTHQUAKE LOADING

Pages
1033–1046
Publication Date
2018-12-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results show that if the cylindrical steel water tank roof is closed in a torispherical dome shaped, the directional deformation will decrease.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Cylindrical steel storage tanks are widely used for the storage of various liquids, industrial chemicals and firefighting waters.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Liquid-storage tanks have many different configurations; however, in this study, cylindrical ground-supported liquid steel tanks were preferred due to their simplicity design and performance of resistances against seismic loads, when compared with other configurations.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results show that if the cylindrical steel water tank roof is closed in a torispherical dome shaped, the directional deformation will decrease.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Cylindrical storage tank · API 650 · FEM analysis

Abstract

Cylindrical steel storage tanks are widely used for the storage of various liquids, industrial chemicals and firefighting waters. They have been used for cooling purposes in nuclear power plants in recent years. Liquid-storage tanks have many different configurations; however, in this study, cylindrical ground-supported liquid steel tanks were preferred due to their simplicity design and performance of resistances against seismic loads, when compared with other configurations. Earthquakes are a natural occurrence and are unpredictable and complex; thus, the steel storage liquid tanks are expected to withstand earthquake-related loads. These tanks may be exposed to some damages such as elephant-foot buckling, diamond-shape buckling, overturning and uplifting during earthquakes. They can also cause great financial and environmental damage with their hazardous chemical contents. Dimensions of cylindrical open-top, flat-closed and torispherical-closed-top tanks were determined for 3D-finite element method (FEM) models in an ANSYS workbench software. This article focuses on the seismic-activity-resistant ground-supported cylindrical (vertical) steel storage liquid tanks. Seismic analyses were conducted under El-Centro earthquake loads. Directional deformation, equivalent stress and acceleration results were presented for both impulsive and convective regions. In this study, directional deformations of the tanks with the same diameter and three different roofs (open-top, flat-closed and torispherical-closed) were compared after the seismic analysis. The results show that if the cylindrical steel water tank roof is closed in a torispherical dome shaped, the directional deformation will decrease. Hence, torispherial roof shape of tank is recommended.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇELİK, A. İ., KÖSE, M. M., AKGÜL, T., ALPAY, A. C. (2018). DIRECTIONAL-DEFORMATION ANALYSIS OF CYLINDRICAL STEEL WATER TANKS SUBJECTED TO EL-CENTRO EARTHQUAKE LOADING. Sigma Mühendislik ve Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 4, 1033–1046. https://ajindex.com/articles/418996

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Bayraktar A, Sevim B, Altunışık A C, ( 2010) Türker T. Effect of the model updating on the earthquake behavior of steel storage tanks. J Constr Steel Res, 66: 462–468
  2. Houser, G. W.,( 1954) Earthquake Pressures on Fluid Containers, Eighth Technical Report under Office of Naval Research, Project Designation No. 081 - 095, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, pp. 02-16
  3. Housner G W., ( 1957) Dynamic pressures on accelerated fluid containers. Bull Seismol Soc Am, 47(1): 15–35
  4. Housner G W., (1963) The Dynamic Behavior of Water Tanks. Bull Seismol Soc Am, 53(2): 381–387 [5] Malhotra P K, Wenk T, Wieland M., (2000) Simple Procedure for Seismic Analysis of Liquid-Storage Tanks. Struct Eng Int, 10(3): 197–201
  5. Sunitha K R, Jacob B., (2015) Dynamic Buckling of Steel Water Tank Under Seismic Loading. International Journal of Civil Engineering (IJCE), 4(6): 81–89
  6. Mohamadshahi M, Afrous A., (2015) General considerations in the seismic analysis of steel storage tanks. Journal of Scientific Research and Development, 2(6): 151–156
  7. Brebbia C A, Popov V, Popov V., (2011) Thirty-third international conference on Boundary Elements and Other Mesh Reduction Methods XXXIII. Southamption: Wit Press, 286, web link:
  8. Naghdali H, Hamid K, Masoud G, Ehsan A, Navid K., (2013) Comparison of API650-2008 provisions with FEM analyses for seismic assessment of existing steel oil storage tanks. J Loss Prevent Proc Ind; 26(4)
  9. J.M. Spritzer, S. Guzey, (2017) Review of API 650 Annex E: Design of large steel welded aboveground storage tanks excited by seismic loads, Thin-Walled Structures 112, 41–65
  10. S. Nicolici, R.M. Bilegan, (2013) Fluid structure interaction modeling of liquid sloshing phenomena in flexible tanks, Nucl. Eng. Des. 258, 51–56
  11. Mahmoud R. Maheri, M.E. Karbaschi, M. Mahzoon, (2016) Analytical evaluation of dynamic characteristics of unanchored circular ground-based steel tanks”, Thin-Walled Structure. 109 (1) 251–259
  12. M. Ormeno, T. Larkin, N. Chouw, (2015) The effect of seismic uplift on the shell stresses of liquid-storage tanks, Earthq. Eng. Struct. D 44 (12) 1979–1996
  13. Spritzer J M, Guzey S. (2017) Nonlinear numerical evaluation of large open-top aboveground steel welded liquid storage tanks excited by seismic loads. Thin-Walled Structure, 119: 662–676
  14. American Petroleum Institute (API) Standar