Journals / Sigma Mühendislik ve Fen Bilimleri Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 2

NORM SHIFTING: AN AGENT-BASED MODEL

Pages
817–833
Publication Date
2021-06-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results of the simulations show that minority or majority, group pressure, and loyalty are highly effective in norm shifting.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This paper aims to explain how norms change in the social world through agent-based modelling.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Norms are rules, the roots of which lie in society to guide people to perform expected behaviours.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results of the simulations show that minority or majority, group pressure, and loyalty are highly effective in norm shifting.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Norms · agent-based modelling · minority group

Abstract

This paper aims to explain how norms change in the social world through agent-based modelling. Norms are rules, the roots of which lie in society to guide people to perform expected behaviours. Norms exist as sui generis in societies; however, they are improved and transformed by individuals in time. While norms are rather salient for some behaviours, they are subtle for others. The plurality of norms is one of the reasons for this ambiguity. Norm plurality occurs in societies where groups that have different norms for the same behaviour live together and interact constantly. Beyond that, norm differences are the basis on which different groups are defined. How do people change the norms that are already adopted, or how do adopted norms shift to opposite ones? This paper tries to explain norm shifts when there is more than one norm for a specific behaviour in an artificial society in accordance with certain factors: the minority/majority group’s norm, group pressure, and loyalty of the individual. Agent-based modelling is a useful tool to understand the social world and create an artificial one. Agents shift their norms to interact with other agents. Results of the simulations show that minority or majority, group pressure, and loyalty are highly effective in norm shifting.

🔖

Cite This Article

EREN, Z., BOZDAĞ, C. E. (2021). NORM SHIFTING: AN AGENT-BASED MODEL. Sigma Mühendislik ve Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 2, 817–833. https://ajindex.com/articles/418954

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Elsenbroich C. and Gilbert N., (2014) Modelling Norms, Dordrecht: Springer
  2. Savarimuthu B. T. R., Cranefield S., Purvis M. A. and Purvis M. K., (2013) Identifying Prohibition Norms in Agent Societies, Artificial Intelligence and Law, 21(1), 1-46
  3. Brauer M. and Chaurand N., (2010) Descriptive Norms, Prescriptive Norms, and Social Control: An Intercultural Comparison of People's Reactions to Uncivil Behaviors, European Journal of Psychology, 40, 490-499
  4. Mason W. A., Conrey F. R. and Smith E. R., (2007) Situating Social Influence Processes: Dynamic, Multidirectional Flows of Influence within Social Networks, Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11 (3), 279-300
  5. Gilbert N., (2004) Agent-based Social Simulation: Dealing with Complexity, The Complex Systems Network of Excellence, 9(25), 1-14
  6. Macal C. M. and North M. J., (2010) Tutorial on Agent-based Modelling and Simulation, Journal of Simulation, 4(3), 151-162
  7. Siebers P. O., Macal C. M., Garnett J., Buxton D. and Pidd M., (2010) Discrete-event Simulation is Dead, Long Live Agent-based Simulation!, Journal of Simulation, 4(3), 204-210
  8. Helbing D., Yu W., Opp K.-D. and Rauhut H., (2014) Conditions for the Emergence of Shared Norms in Populations with Incompatible Preferences, PloS One, 9(8), e104207
  9. Jackson J. C., Rand D., Lewis K., Norton M. I. and Gray K., (2017) Agent-based modeling: A guide for Social Psychologists, Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(4), 387-395
  10. Xenitidou M. and Elsenbroich C., (2011) Construct Validity of Agent-based Simulation of Normative Behaviour, The International Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Sciences, 5(4), 67-80
  11. Jung J., Bramson A. and Crano W. D., (2018) An agent-based model of indirect minority influence on social change and diversity, Social Influence, 13(1), 18-38
  12. Verhagen H., (2001) Simulation of the Learning of Norms, Social Science Computer Review, 19(3), 296-306
  13. Andrighetto G., Villatoro D. and Conte R., (2010) Norm Internalization in Artificial Societies, AI Communications, 23(4), 325-339
  14. Epstein J. M., (2001) Learning to Be Thoughtless: Social Norms and Individual Computation, Computatitonal Economics, 18, 9-24
  15. Neumann M., (2008) Homo Socionicus: A Case Study of Simulation Models of Norms, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 11(4), 6
  16. Hollander C. D. and Wu A. S., (2011) The Current State of Normative Agent-Based Systems, Journal of Artificial Societi