Journals / Sigma Mühendislik ve Fen Bilimleri Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 2

SIMULATION OF SHRINKAGE EFFECT IN DRYING OF FOOD PRODUCTS IN HOT-AIR DRYER

Pages
527–544
Publication Date
2021-06-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was shown a very good agreement between numerical simulation and experimental solution.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Simulation of the hot-air drying period is very significant to decrease energy expenditure and increase food quality effect.
📊
Key Findings & Data:At the end of the 180 minute drying process, the maximum change in moisture content was found to be in eggplant with 83%.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was shown a very good agreement between numerical simulation and experimental solution.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Food drying · numerical and experimental investigation · shrinkage

Abstract

Simulation of the hot-air drying period is very significant to decrease energy expenditure and increase food quality effect. In the present study, drying kinetics of three different foods (carrot, eggplant and cucumber) were investigated experimentally. At the end of the 180 minute drying process, the maximum change in moisture content was found to be in eggplant with 83%. The simulation model developed for hot-air drying was used to solve the heat and mass transfer equations which include shrinkage effect for food products. The shrinkage effect was obtained using the Arbitrary Lagrangian Eulerian method. At the end of the drying process, volume change for carrot, cucumber and eggplant were obtained as 55.7%, 55.7% and 68.7% respectively.On the other hand, the numerical model defines the internal moisture distributions of the food depending on the time. In this study, furthermore, empirical data were applied to different drying models. Statistical conclusions indicated that the Midilli model was the best to explain the drying behaviour for cucumber (R2= 0.99, SEE=0.0077, x2= 6.00×10-5) and eggplant (R2= 0.99, SEE=0.0169, x2= 0.0003). However, Wang and Singh model was found to be the most suitable model for carrot (R2=0.99, SEE=0.0054, x2=2.95×10-5). The experimental data were compared with numerical results for the drying of carrots, eggplant, and cucumber. It was shown a very good agreement between numerical simulation and experimental solution.

🔖

Cite This Article

TURKAN, B., ETEMOGLU, A. B. (2021). SIMULATION OF SHRINKAGE EFFECT IN DRYING OF FOOD PRODUCTS IN HOT-AIR DRYER. Sigma Mühendislik ve Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 2, 527–544. https://ajindex.com/articles/418934

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Singh B., Gupta A.K., (2007) Mass transfer kinetics and determination of effective diffusivity during convective dehydration of pre-osmosed carrot cubes, Journal of Food Engineering, 79, 459 470
  2. Lima K. S., Cople A.L.S., Lima L.C., Freitas R.C., Della-Modesta R.L., Godoy O., (2004) Effect of Low Doses of Irradiation on the Carotenoids in Read-to-Eat Carrots, Food Science and Technology (Campinas), 24(2), 183–193
  3. Puig A., Perez-Munuera I., Carcel J.A., Hernando I., Garcia-Perez J.V., (2012) Moisture loss kinetics and microstructural changes in eggplant (Solanum melongena L.) during conventional and ultrasonically assisted convective drying, Food and Bioproducts Processing, 90, 624–632
  4. Alibas I., (2006) Characteristics of chard leaves during microwave, convective, and combined microwaveconvective drying, Drying Technology, 24(1), 1425-1435
  5. Lima A.G.B., Queiroz M.R., Nebra S.A., (2002) Simultaneous moisture transport and shrinkage during drying solids with ellipsoidal configuration, Chemical Engineering Journal, 86, 83–85
  6. Avcı A., Can M., (1999) The analysis of the drying process on unsteady forced convection in thin films of ınk, Applied Thermal Engineering, 19,641-657
  7. Lewis W. K., (1921) The rate of drying of solid materials, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 13(5), 427–432
  8. Henderson S. M., Pabis S., (1961) Grain drying theory I: temperature effect on drying coefficient, J. Agr. Eng. Resource, 6(3), 169–174
  9. Madamba P. S., Driscoll R. H., Buckle K. A., (1996) The thin layer drying characteristics of garlic slices, Journal of Food Engineering, 29(1), 75-97
  10. Wang C. Y., Singh R. P., (1978) A single layer drying equation for rough rice, ASAE, Paper No: 78-3001, St. Joseph, MI
  11. Midilli A., Kucuk H., Yapar Z., (2002) A new model for single layer drying, Drying Technology, 20(7), 1503-1513
  12. Vega A. M. N., Sturm B., Hofacker W., (2016) Simulation of the convective drying process with automatic control of surface temperature, Journal of Food Engineering, 170, 16-23
  13. Bezerra C.V., Silva L.H.M., Corrêa D. F., Rodrigues A.M.C., (2015) A modeling study for moisture diffusivities and moisture transfer coefficients in drying of passion fruit peel, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 85, 750–755
  14. Udayraj Md. A., Mishra R. K., Chandramohan V.P., Talukdar P., (2014) Numerical modeling of convective drying of food with spatially dependent transfer coefficient in a turbulent flow field, International Journal o