Journals / Sigma Mühendislik ve Fen Bilimleri Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 4

UTILIZATION OF ORGANIC RANKINE CYCLE FOR ANALYZING ENERGY AND EXERGY OF THE WASTE HEAT RECOVERY SYSTEM

Pages
1963–1976
Publication Date
2021-10-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The paper contributes significant impacts for reducing environmental emissions and improving organic Rankine cycle systems.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The study analyzes exergy and energy by applying environment-friendly newly developed refrigerants.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Various environment-friendly refrigerants have been selected as working fluids to compare the effects of net work output, pump consumption, coolant flow rate, thermal efficiency, exergy efficiency, exergy destructions, condenser exergy reduction, and exergy efficiencies with various evaporator pressures.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The paper contributes significant impacts for reducing environmental emissions and improving organic Rankine cycle systems.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Energy analysis · exergy analysis · efficiency

Abstract

The study analyzes exergy and energy by applying environment-friendly newly developed refrigerants. Initially, a thermodynamic model has been developed. Then, not only energy but also exergy have been investigated utilizing the model. Various environment-friendly refrigerants have been selected as working fluids to compare the effects of net work output, pump consumption, coolant flow rate, thermal efficiency, exergy efficiency, exergy destructions, condenser exergy reduction, and exergy efficiencies with various evaporator pressures. It has been found that R141b and R21 give the highest amount of thermal and exergy efficiency at low and high evaporator pressure respectively. Moreover, R141b gives the highest amount of pump consumption and net work output whereas; R124 gives the highest amount of coolant flow rates. Additionally, R141b and R21 refrigerants give the highest amount of evaporator and condenser exergy efficiency respectively. On the contrary, R124 refrigerant gives the highest amount of expander exergy efficiency. In this paper, analysis has been done for various environment-friendly newly developed refrigerants which are very rare in the literature. The paper contributes significant impacts for reducing environmental emissions and improving organic Rankine cycle systems.

🔖

Cite This Article

HOSSAIN, F., MIAH, M. A. (2021). UTILIZATION OF ORGANIC RANKINE CYCLE FOR ANALYZING ENERGY AND EXERGY OF THE WASTE HEAT RECOVERY SYSTEM. Sigma Mühendislik ve Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 4, 1963–1976. https://ajindex.com/articles/418869

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. ⦁ F. Yang, H. Zhang, C. Bei, S. Song, and E. Wang, “Parametric optimization and performance analysis of ORC (organic Rankine cycle) for diesel engine waste heat recovery with a fin-and-tube evaporator,” Energy, vol. 91, pp. 128-141, 2015, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2015.08.034. ⦁ N. Nazari, P. Heidarnejad, and S. Porkhial, “Multi-objective optimization of a combined steam-organic Rankine cycle based on exergy and exergo-economic analysis for waste heat recovery application”, Energy conversion and management, vol. 127, pp. 366-379, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2016.09.022. ⦁ H. Yağlı, Y. Koç, A. Koç, A. Görgülü, and A. Tandiroğlu, “Parametric optimization and exergetic analysis comparison of subcritical and supercritical organic Rankine cycle (ORC) for biogas fuelled combined heat and power (CHP) engine exhaust gas waste heat,” Energy, vol. 111, pp. 923-932, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2016.05.119. ⦁ H. Zhai, Q. An, L. Shi, V. Lemort, and S. Quoilin, “Categorization and analysis of heat sources for organic Rankine cycle systems,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 64, pp. 790-805, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.06.076. ⦁ W. Sun, X. Yue, and Y. Wang, “Exergy efficiency analysis of ORC (Organic Rankine Cycle) and ORC-based combined cycles driven by low-temperature waste heat,” Energy Conversion and Management, vol. 135, pp. 63-73, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2016.12.042. ⦁ H. Tian, L. Chang, Y. Gao, G. Shu, M. Zhao, and N. Yan, “Thermo-economic analysis of zeotropic mixtures based on siloxanes for engine waste heat recovery using a dual-loop organic Rankine cycle (DORC),” Energy conversion and management, vol. 136, pp. 11-26, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2016.12.066. ⦁ T. Koroglu, “Advanced exergy analysis of an organic Rankine cycle waste heat recovery system of a marine power plant,” Journal of Thermal Engineering, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 1136-1148, 2017, doi: 10.18186/thermal.298614. ⦁ S. Seyedkavoosi, S. Javan, and K. Kota, “Exergy-based optimization of an organic Rankine cycle (ORC) for waste heat recovery from an internal combustion engine (ICE),” Applied Thermal Engineering, vol. 126, pp. 447-457, 2017, doi: j.applthermaleng.2017.07.124. ⦁ Z. Ge, J. Li, Q. Liu, Y. Duan, and Z. Yang, “Thermodynamic analysis of dual-loop organic Rankine cycle using zeotropic mixtures for internal combustion engine waste heat recovery,” Energy conversion and management, vol. 166, pp. 201-214, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2018.04.027. ⦁ Y. Koç, H. Ya