Journals / Turkish journal of emergency medicine (Online) / 2022 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 2

Auricular avulsion injuries: Literature review and management algorithm

Pages
59–66
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Our results indicate that in the acute setting with no available microvascular expertise, DR of auricular avulsion injuries can be better than other nonmicrosurgical techniques in generating good esthetic results, especially in incomplete auricular avulsion and small segment avulsion.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Traumatic ear avulsion (TEA) may have tremendous psychological consequences if not managed properly.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A total of 28 cases in 18 publications were reviewed and analyzed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Our results indicate that in the acute setting with no available microvascular expertise, DR of auricular avulsion injuries can be better than other nonmicrosurgical techniques in generating good esthetic results, especially in incomplete auricular avulsion and small segment avulsion.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Traumatic ear avulsion (TEA) may have tremendous psychological consequences if not managed properly. There are no clear guidelines on the surgical management of these injuries, especially in developing countries where microsurgical facilities are lacking. We aimed to review the literature on surgical management of TEA with the main focus on direct re‑attachment (DR) so as to develop a surgical management algorithm that can be applied in the absence of microsurgical facilities. We performed an extensive review of the relevant English literature on papers indexed in PubMed describing TEA repaired with DR without restriction to a specific publication time window. A total of 28 cases in 18 publications were reviewed and analyzed. Our results indicate that in the acute setting with no available microvascular expertise, DR of auricular avulsion injuries can be better than other nonmicrosurgical techniques in generating good esthetic results, especially in incomplete auricular avulsion and small segment avulsion. The operative approach depends on the clinical setting. DR of the auricular avulsion injuries is an accepted approach. It produces good cosmetic outcomes while preserving the auricular area for future reconstruction in case of re‑attachment failure.

🔖

Cite This Article

AL-ALI, M. A., ABU-ZIDAN, F. M. (2022). Auricular avulsion injuries: Literature review and management algorithm. Turkish journal of emergency medicine (Online), Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 2, 59–66. https://ajindex.com/articles/418863

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Park C, Roh TS. Anatomy and embryology of the external ear and their clinical correlation. Clin Plast Surg 2002;29:155‑74
  2. Erdmann D, Bruno AD, Follmar KE, Stokes TH, Gonyon DL, Marcus JR. The helical arcade: Anatomic basis for survival in near‑total ear avulsion. J Craniofac Surg 2009;20:245‑8
  3. Steffen A, Frenzel H. Trauma management of the auricle. Facial Plast Surg 2015;31:382‑5
  4. Kind GM, Buncke GM, Placik OJ, Jansen DA, D’Amore T, Buncke HJ Jr. Total ear replantation. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997;99:1858‑67
  5. Jung SW, Lee J, Oh SJ, Koh SH, Chung CH, Lee JW. A review of microvascular ear replantation. J Reconstr Microsurg 2013;29:181‑8
  6. Steffen A, Katzbach R, Klaiber S. A comparison of ear re‑attachment methods: A review of 25 years since Pennington. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006;118:1358‑64
  7. Gailey AD, Farquhar D, Clark JM, Shockley WW. Auricular avulsion injuries and re‑attachment techniques: A systematic review. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol 2020;5:381‑9
  8. Li D, Xu F, Zhang R, Zhang Q, Xu Z, Li Y, et al. Surgical reconstruction of traumatic partial ear defects based on a novel classification of defect sizes and surrounding skin conditions. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016;138:307e‑316e
  9. Pearl RA, Sabbagh W. Reconstruction following traumatic partial amputation of the ear. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011;127:621‑9
  10. D’ArcangeloM, Al‑AliMA, Abu‑ZidanFM. Primary re‑attachment of near‑complete ear amputation: A successful outcome. Ear Nose Throat J 2020 Dec15:145561320982170
  11. Ozçelik D, Unveren T, Toplu G. Subtotal ear amputation with a very narrow pedicle: A case report and review of the literature. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg 2009;15:306‑10
  12. Kolodzynski MN, Kon M, Egger S, Breugem CC. Mechanisms of ear trauma and reconstructive techniques in 105 consecutive patients. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2017;274:723‑8
  13. Weerda H. Surgery of the Auricle: Tumors-Trauma-DefectsAbnormalities. New York: Thieme; 2007. p. 314
  14. Park C, Lineaweaver WC, Rumly TO, Buncke HJ. Arterial supply of the anterior ear. Plast Reconstr Surg 1992;90:38‑44
  15. Germann AM, Jamal Z, Al Khalili Y. Anatomy, head and neck, scalp veins. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing, Copyright © 2021, StatPearls Publishing LLC.; 2021
  16. Kind GM. Microvascular ear replantation. Clin Plast Surg 2002;29:233‑48, vii
  17. Yotsuyanagi T, Yamashita K, Watanabe Y, Urushidate S, Yokoi K, Sawada Y. Reconstruction of a subtotally amputated auricle: A case report