Journals / Tüketici ve Tüketim Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2

Hizmet Firmaları İçin Müşteri Yaşamboyu Değeri Modellemesine İlişkin Bir Yaklaşım

An Approach to Customer Lifetime Value Modeling for Service Firms1

Pages
221–255
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the coefficients of the utility function generated, flight route and online ticket sales and reservation, which are components of marketing mix element “Place” and brand image which is a component of marketing mix element “Promotion” contributes more to customer utility than other components

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, it is aimed to develop an approach to customer lifetime value calculation and in this context individual brand switching matrices are formed.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The model is specified at service firms and airline industry is selected as the workshop sector of the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the coefficients of the utility function generated, flight route and online ticket sales and reservation, which are components of marketing mix element “Place” and brand image which is a component of marketing mix element “Promotion” contributes more to customer utility than other components
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study, it is aimed to develop an approach to customer lifetime value calculation and in this context individual brand switching matrices are formed. The model is specified at service firms and airline industry is selected as the workshop sector of the study. To be able to form the individual brand switching matrices by using marketing mix elements, the components of marketing mix elements of airline industry are attempted to be identified. According to the coefficients of the utility function generated, flight route and online ticket sales and reservation, which are components of marketing mix element “Place” and brand image which is a component of marketing mix element “Promotion” contributes more to customer utility than other components

Özet

Bu çalışmada, müşteri yaşam boyu değerinin hesaplanmasına ilişkin bir yaklaşım geliştirilmeye çalışılmış ve bu bağlamda bireysel marka değiştirme matrisleri oluşturulmuştur. Model hizmet firmalarına yönelik olup havayolu sektörü çalışmanın uygulama alanı olarak seçilmiştir. Pazarlama karması kullanılarak bireysel marka değiştirme matrislerinin oluşturulabilmesi için, havayolu sektörünün pazarlama karmasını oluşturan bileşenler belirlenmeye çalışılmıştır. Çalışmada ortaya konan fayda fonksiyonuna göre, pazarlama karmasının "dağıtım" öğesinin uçuş rotası ve internet üzerinden bilet satışı bileşenleri ile "tutundurma" öğesinin marka imajı bileşeninin müşteri faydasına olan katkılarının diğer bileşenlerden fazla olduğu görülmüştür

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZYÖRÜK, H. E., KAVAK, B. (2017). Hizmet Firmaları İçin Müşteri Yaşamboyu Değeri Modellemesine İlişkin Bir Yaklaşım. Tüketici ve Tüketim Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2, 221–255. https://ajindex.com/articles/418825

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Bauer, H. H., Hammerschmidt, M. ve Braehler, M. (2003). “The Customer Lifetime Value Concept and Its Contribution to Corporate Valuation”, Yearbook of Marketing and Consumer Research, (1), 47-66.
  2. Berger, P. D. ve Nasr, N. (1998). “Customer Lifetime Value: Marketing Models and Applications”, Journal of Interactive Marketing, (12), 1, 17-29.
  3. Chen, C. F. (2008). “Investigating Structural Relationships Between Service Quality, Perceived Value, Satisfaction and Behavioral Intentions for Air Passengers: Evidence from Taiwan”, Transportation Research Part A, (42), 709–717.
  4. Collings, D. ve Baxter, N. (2005). “Valuing Customers”, BT Technology Journal, (23), 3, 24-29.
  5. Donkers, B., Verhoef, P. C., ve Jong, M. D. (2003). “Predicting Customer Lifetime Value in Multi-Service Industries”, http://repub.eur.nl/ res/pub/325/ERS-2003-038-MKT.pdf. Erişim tarihi: 17.01.2012.
  6. Gloy, B. A., Akridge, J. T. ve Preckel, P. V. (1997). “Customer Lifetime Value: An Application in the Rural Petroleum Market”, Agribusiness, (13), 3, 335-347.
  7. Guadagni, P. M. ve Little, J. D. (1983). “A Logit Model of Brand Choice Calibrated on Scanner Data”, Marketing Science, (2), 3, 203-238.
  8. Gupta, S. ve Lehmann, D. R. (2003). “Customers As Assets”, Journal of Interactive Marketing, (17), 1, 9-24.
  9. Hatcher, L. (1994). A Step-by-Step Approach to Using the SAS System for Factor Analysis and Structural Equation Modeling. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc. Hoekstra, J. C. ve Huizingh, E. K. (1999). “The Lifetime Value Concept in Customer-Based Marketing”, Journal of Market Focused Management, (3), 257-274.
  10. Hwang, H., Jung, T. ve Suh, E. (2004). “An LTV Model and Customer Segmentation Based On Customer Value: A Case Study On The Wireless Telecommunication Industry”, Expert Systems with Applications, (26), 181–188.
  11. Kumar, V., Ramani, G. ve Bohling, T. (2004). “Customer Lifetime Value Approaches and Best Practice Applications”, Journal of Interactive Marketing, (18), 3, 60-72.
  12. Lim, E. J. ve Hwang, C. S. (2009). “Consumer Motivation for Brand-Switching According to Types of Fashion Products”, Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, (3), 12, 1991-2001.
  13. Luo, X. (2006). “Examine The Factors Influencing Brand-Switching: The Effects of Advertising and Promotion”, Unpublished Master Thesis, The University of Nottingham, Nottingham. Morgan, M. S. ve Dev, C. S. (1994). “An Empirical Study of Brand Switching for A Retail Service”, Journal of Retailing, (70), 3, 267-282.
  14. Onur, A. (2005). “Müşteri Sermayesi Yöne