Journals / Türk Geriatri Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 4

PREVALENCE AND CLINICAL FEATURES OF CHRONIC CRITICAL ILLNESS IN THE ELDERLY POPULATION IN TURKEY

Pages
501–508
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

More work is neededto define chronic critical illness more clearly in elderly.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: The definition of chronic critical illness in the elderly has not yetbeen determined.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The aim of the study is to determine the prevalence and clinicalfeatures of chronic critical illness in the elderly population in Turkey.Materials and Methods: Data from 16 intensive care units of public and privatehospitals in Turkey were evaluated.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:More work is neededto define chronic critical illness more clearly in elderly.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objectives: The definition of chronic critical illness in the elderly has not yetbeen determined. The aim of the study is to determine the prevalence and clinicalfeatures of chronic critical illness in the elderly population in Turkey.Materials and Methods: Data from 16 intensive care units of public and privatehospitals in Turkey were evaluated. Patients staying in the intensive care units for atleast eight days between 2015 and 2017 and having at least one of the additionalcriteria were accepted as chronic critical illness and they were divided into twogroups by age, those 65 and older and those under 65.Results: The chronic critical illness patient rate in the intensive care units was10.7%. Of chronic critical illness patients in the intensive care units, 60.9% were 65years of age and older, and the mortality rate of patients 65 years and older was70%. The frequencies of ischemic stroke and sepsis, the number of patients withcomorbidities, and the mortality rate were higher in patients over 65 years ofage, while the frequency of traumatic brain injury, presence of a major wound,tracheostomy, length of hospital stay and cost of care were higher in patients under65 years of age.Conclusion: We determined that prolonged mechanical ventilation, traumaticbrain injury, tracheostomy and major wound presence in intensive care unitspatients 65 years and older increased hospital stay and costs. More work is neededto define chronic critical illness more clearly in elderly.

🔖

Cite This Article

DEMİRKIRAN, H., ERDİVANLI, B., KOÇ, S., ÖZMEN, M., ÇAĞAÇ, A., TUNCER, M., BAYRAKCI, S., BAHADIR, T., BAHAR, İ., KESKİN, S., UZUNOGLU, E., KARADAMAR, U., TOMAK, Y., ALMALİ, N., ÇÖMEZ, M. S., TOKUR, M. E., BİNİCİ, O., TEKELİ, A. E., KARAKAŞ, B., ÖKSÜZ, H. (2020). PREVALENCE AND CLINICAL FEATURES OF CHRONIC CRITICAL ILLNESS IN THE ELDERLY POPULATION IN TURKEY. Türk Geriatri Dergisi, Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 4, 501–508. https://ajindex.com/articles/418751

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Polastri M, Comellini V, Pisani L. Defining the prevalence of chronic critical illness. Pulmonology 2020;26(3):119-20. (PMID: 31812701
  2. Herridge MS, Tansey CM, Matte A, et al. Functional disability 5 years after acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 2011;364(14):1293-304. (PMID: 21470008
  3. Carson SS. Definitions and epidemiology of the chronically critically ill. Respir Care 2012;57(6):848- 56; discussion 56-8. (PMID: 22663962
  4. Laake JH, Dybwik K, Flaatten HK, et al. Impact of the post-World War II generation on intensive care needs in Norway. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2010;54(4):479- 84. (PMID: 19930244
  5. Boniatti MM, Friedman G, Castilho RK, Vieira SR, Fialkow L. Characteristics of chronically critically ill patients: comparing two definitions. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 2011;66(4):701-4. (PMID: 21655767
  6. Nelson JE, Meier DE, Litke A, et al. The symptom burden of chronic critical illness. Crit Care Med 2004;32(7):1527-34. (PMID: 15241097
  7. Vásquez-Revilla HR, Revilla-Rodríguez E, RaymundoAguilar CA, Gaytan- Sánchez BM, Terrazas-Luna V. Epidemiological characteristics of patients with chronic critical illness. An ambispective observational study. Medicina Interna de México 2017;33(2):168- 76. (in Spanish
  8. Iwashyna TJ, Hodgson CL, Pilcher D, et al. Timing of onset and burden of persistent critical illness in Australia and New Zealand: a retrospective, population-based, observational study. Lancet Respir Med 2016;4(7):566-73. (PMID: 27155770
  9. Kahn JM, Le T, Angus DC, et al. The epidemiology of chronic critical illness in the United States*. Crit Care Med 2015;43(2):282-7. (PMID: 25377018
  10. Guidet B, Leblanc G, Simon T, et al. Effect of Systematic Intensive Care Unit Triage on Longterm Mortality Among Critically Ill Elderly Patients in France: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2017;318(15):1450-9. (PMID: 28973065
  11. Kwak SH, Jeong CW, Lee SH, Lee HJ, Koh Y. Current status of intensive care units registered as critical care subspecialty training hospitals in Korea. J Korean Med Sci 2014;29(3):431-7. (PMID: 24616595
  12. Heyland D, Cook D, Bagshaw SM, et al. The Very Elderly Admitted to ICU: A Quality Finish? Crit Care Med 2015;43(7):1352-60. (PMID: 25901550
  13. Milbrandt EB, Eldadah B, Nayfield S, Hadley E, Angus DC. Toward an integrated research agenda for critical illness in aging. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2010;182(8):995-1003. (PMID: 20558632
  14. Bellani G, Laffey JG, Pham T, et al. Epidemiology, Patterns of Care, and Mor