Journals / Electrica / 2022 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 2

Multiple Classification of Cyber Attacks Using Machine Learning

Journal
Electrica
Pages
313–320
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The random forest, decision tree, logistic regression, and Naive Bayes classifiers were all implemented on the pre-processed data set, and it was observed that the random forest classifier had the highest accuracy of 99.94%.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:With the rapid growth of technology, the Internet’s use and the number of devices connected to it are growing at a breakneck pace.
📊
Key Findings & Data:As a result of this development, network traffic has increased in volume and has become more vulnerable.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The random forest, decision tree, logistic regression, and Naive Bayes classifiers were all implemented on the pre-processed data set, and it was observed that the random forest classifier had the highest accuracy of 99.94%.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

With the rapid growth of technology, the Internet’s use and the number of devices connected to it are growing at a breakneck pace. As a result of this development, network traffic has increased in volume and has become more vulnerable. The focus has been on the development of learning intrusion detection systems in order to detect sophisticated and undetected threats. Because machine learning-based models achieve great accuracy in a short amount of time, they are commonly utilized in intrusion detection systems. Multiple classifications were made in this study to detect assaults on network traffic using machine learning. The model was created using the CICIDS2017 data set, which comprises both current and historical attacks. The high-performance computer was used to rapidly conduct tests on the CICIDS2017 data set, which contains around 2.8 million rows of data. We improved the performance of the machine learning models we developed by cleaning, normalizing, oversampling for an unbalanced number of labels, and reducing the size of the data set using feature selection methods. The random forest, decision tree, logistic regression, and Naive Bayes classifiers were all implemented on the pre-processed data set, and it was observed that the random forest classifier had the highest accuracy of 99.94%.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜVEN, E. Y., GÜLGÜN, S., MANAV, C., BAKIR, B., AYDIN, Z. G. (2022). Multiple Classification of Cyber Attacks Using Machine Learning. Electrica, Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 2, 313–320. https://ajindex.com/articles/418650

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (2)

  1. A. Thakkar, and R. Lohiya, “A review of the advancement in intrusion detection datasets,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 167, pp. 636–645, 2020. [CrossRef] 2. N. Ye, X. Li, Q. Chen, S. M. Emran, and M. Xu, “Probabilistic techniques for intrusion detection based on computer audit data,” IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. A Syst. Hum., vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 266–274, 2001. 3. S. Rastegari, P. Hingston, and C. Lam, “Evolving statistical rulesets for network intrusion detection,” Appl. Soft Comput., vol. 33, no. C, pp. 348–359, 2015. [CrossRef] 4. S. Rajagopal, P. P. Kundapur, and H. K. S., “Towards effective network intrusion detection: From concept to creation on Azure cloud,” IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 19723–19742, 2021. [CrossRef] 5. I. Sharafaldin, A. H. Lashkari, and A. A. Ghorbani, “Toward generating a new intrusion detection dataset and intrusion traffic characterization,” In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Information Systems Security and Privacy, Vol. 1. Funchal, Madeira, Portugal: ICISSP, 2018, pp. 108–116 6. A. Gharib, I. Sharafaldin, A. H. Lashkari, and A. A. Ghorbani, “An evaluation framework for intrusion detection dataset,” In International Conference on Information Science and Security (ICISS), Vol. 2016, 2016.
  2. Pattaya, Thailand: IEEE Publications, 2016, pp. 1–6. 7. T. Saranya, S. Sridevi, C. Deisy, T. D. Chung, and M. K. A. A. Khan, “Performance analysis of machine learning algorithms in intrusion detection system: A review,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 171, pp. 1251–1260, 2020. [CrossRef] 8. H. Ahmetoğlu, and R. Daş, “Analysis of feature selection approaches in large scale cyber intelligence data with deep learning,” In 28th Signal Processing and Communications Appl. Conference (SIU). Gaziantep, Turkey: IEEE Publications, 2020, pp. 1–4. 9. A. Yulianto, P. Sukarno, and N. A. Suwastika, “Improving adaboost-based intrusion detection system (IDS) performance on CIC IDS 2017 dataset,” In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (vol. 1192, no. 1, pp. 012018). IOP Publishing, 2019. 10. Kurniabudi, D. Stiawan, Darmawijoyo, M. Y. Bin Idris, A. M. Bamhdi, and R. Budiarto, “CICIDS-2017 dataset feature analysis with information gain for anomaly detection,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, p. 132911–132921, 2020. 11. Z. Pelletier, and M. Abualkibash, “Evaluating the CIC IDS-2017 dataset using machine learning methods and creating multiple predictive models in the statistical computing language R,” Science, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 187–191, 2020. 12. M. Aamir, S. S.