Journals / Journal of Limnology and Freshwater Fisheries Research / 2021 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3

Maturation and Fecundity of Barbus cyclolepis from the Stryama River of the Maritsa River Drainage Basin in Bulgaria

Pages
233–240
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The population parameters, established by this study, now represent a reference point, enabling a monitoring of the species’ population dynamics.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:A field-based study of the reproductive aspects of Round-scaled barbel biology took place in the Stryama River, during the autumnal season of the period 2010–2011.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A total of 202 Round-scaled barbels were caught by electrofishing.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The population parameters, established by this study, now represent a reference point, enabling a monitoring of the species’ population dynamics.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2010–2011 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

A field-based study of the reproductive aspects of Round-scaled barbel biology took place in the Stryama River, during the autumnal season of the period 2010–2011. This is the first study of the reproduction of this species. A total of 202 Round-scaled barbels were caught by electrofishing. The study found that both sexes reach sexual maturity in their second year. Females became sexually mature, once they reach 94 mm length and 13 g weight. Males became sexually mature once they reach 60 mm length and 12 g weight. Fecundity ranged from 460 to 18.420 eggs. Average fecundity was 6.944 eggs. Absolute fertility was positively correlated with the growth of fish length and mass. Consequently, five years old fish had the highest fertility rate. The average values of relative fecundity were 210 eggs per kilo. The reproductive parameters are an indicator of the growth conditions of the river, as well as the reproductive patterns and state of the fish population. The population parameters, established by this study, now represent a reference point, enabling a monitoring of the species’ population dynamics.

🔖

Cite This Article

KOLEV, V. (2021). Maturation and Fecundity of Barbus cyclolepis from the Stryama River of the Maritsa River Drainage Basin in Bulgaria. Journal of Limnology and Freshwater Fisheries Research, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3, 233–240. https://ajindex.com/articles/418583

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (2)

  1. ArcGIS. 2013. ArcGIS Online; [cited 10 Jan 2019]. Available from: http://www.arcgis.com/home/webmap/viewer.html BD-IBR 2015. Baseinova Direkcia-Iztochno Belomorski Region, [East Aegean River Basin Directorate]. Informacia zakachestvatana vodatav rekite: Topolnitsa, Luda Yana, Stryama, Yadenitsa, Chepinska and Vicha. Unpublished raw data. [in Bulgarian]. Bianco G. 1998. Diversity of Barbinae fishes in southern Europe with description of a new genus and a new species (Cyprinidae). Ital J of Zool. 65(sup1):125-136. doi: 10.1080/11250009809386804 Economidis P. 1989. Distribution pattern of the genus Barbus (Pisces, Cyprinidae) in the freshwaters of Greece. Trav Mus Hist Nat “Grigore Antipa”. 30:223-229. Heckel J. 1837. Ichthyologische beitrage zu den familien der Cottoiden, Scorpaenoiden, Gobioiden und Cyprinoiden. Ann Wien Mus. 2:143-164. [in German]. Kolev V. 2013. Species composition of the ichthyophauna of some tributaries of the Maritsa River. Forestry Ideas. 19(2):129-139. Kolev V. 2016. Sastoyanie na populaciite na marishkata mryana (Barbus cyclolepis Heckel, 1848) ina marishkia kefal (Squalius orpheus Kottelat & Economidis, 2006) v nyakoi pritoci na reka Marica i vazmozhnosti za badeshtoto im stopanisvane. [PhD Thesis]. University of Forestry-Sofia. 159 p. [in Bulgarian]. Kolev V, Raikova G. 2019. Maturation and fecundity of the Barbus cyclolepis, Heckel from the Chepinska River, Maritsa River basin, Bulgaria. Forestry Ideas. 25(2):443-450.
  2. Kottelat M, Freyhof J. 2007. Handbook of European Freshwater Fishes. Berlin, Germany: Publications Kottelat 646 p. Marinov B. 1989. Taksonomia, faunistika i binomia na nyakoi vidove ot sem. Cyprinidae и Cottidae (Pisces) ot Bulgaria. [PhD Thesis]. Sofia University 76 p. [in Bulgarian]. Mihaylova L. 1965. Varhu ihtiofaunata na Trakija. Fauna na Trakia. Part II. Bulgarian Academy of sciences. Zoological institute with museum. 265-289. [in Bulgarian]. Morozov A. 1964. O koeficiente zlrelosti polovyh produktov ryb. Voprosy Ihtiologii. 4(33):757–762. [in Russian]. Nikolsky G. 1965. Teoria dinamiki stada ryb kak biologicheskaja osnova ekspluatacii i vozproizvodstva rybynh resursov. „Nauka”. Moskva. 80–115. [in Russian]. Nikolsky G. 1974. Eekologia ryb. Moskva: Visshaia shkola: 367p. [in Russian]. Özuluğ M, Saç G. 2019. The Freshwater Fish Fauna of Istanbul Province (Turkey). Turk J Biosci Collect. 3(1):19-36. [in Turkish]. Raikova-Petrova G. 1992. Sravnitelno-populacionna biologija na bjalata riba (Stizostedion licioperca