SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology / 2021 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 1

Computational evaluation of inferior vena cava filters through computational fluid dynamics methods

Anand RAJAN
Mina S. MAKARY
Thomas D. MARTYN
Joshua D. DOWELL
Pages
116–121
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This work reviews computational methods used to develop, test, and improve IVC filters to ultimately serve the needs of the patient.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Numerical simulation is growing in its importance toward the design, testing and evaluation of medical devices.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Computational fluid dynamics and finite element analysis allow improved calculation of stress, heat transfer, and flow to better understand the medical device environment.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This work reviews computational methods used to develop, test, and improve IVC filters to ultimately serve the needs of the patient.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Numerical simulation is growing in its importance toward the design, testing and evaluation of medical devices. Computational fluid dynamics and finite element analysis allow improved calculation of stress, heat transfer, and flow to better understand the medical device environment. Current research focuses not only on improving medical devices, but also on improving the computational tools themselves. As methods and computer technology allow for faster simulation times, iterations and trials can be performed faster to collect more data. Given the adverse events associated with long-term inferior vena cava (IVC) filter placement, IVC filter design and device evaluation are of paramount importance. This work reviews computational methods used to develop, test, and improve IVC filters to ultimately serve the needs of the patient.

🔖

Cite This Article

RAJAN, A., MAKARY, M. S., MARTYN, T. D., DOWELL, J. D. (2021). Computational evaluation of inferior vena cava filters through computational fluid dynamics methods. Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 1, 116–121. https://ajindex.com/articles/418474

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Zarins CK, Taylor CA. Endovascular device design in the future: transformation from trial and error to computational design. J Endovasc Ther 2009
  2. 16 Suppl 1:I12–21. [Crossref] 2. Itatani K, Miyazaki S, Furusawa T, et al. New imaging tools in cardiovascular medicine: computational fluid dynamics and 4D flow MRI. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2017
  3. 611–621. [Crossref] 3. Petrini L, Trotta A, Dordoni E, et al. A computational approach for the prediction of fatigue behaviour in peripheral stents: application to a clinical case. Ann Biomed Eng 2016
  4. 536– 547. [Crossref] 4. Assessing credibility of computational modeling through verification and validation: Application to medical devices V&V Standard 40. ASME, 2018. 5. Morrison TM, Hariharan P, Funkhouser CM, Afshari P, Goodin M, Horner M. Assessing computational model credibility using a risk-based framework: application to hemolysis in centrifugal blood pumps. ASAIO J 2019
  5. 349–360. [Crossref] 6. Hariharan P, Aycock KI, Buesen M, et al. Inter-laboratory characterization of the velocity field in the FDA blood pump model using particle image velocimetry (PIV). Cardiovasc Eng Technol 2018
  6. 623–640. [Crossref] 7. Malinauskas RA, Hariharan P, Day SW, et al. FDA benchmark medical device flow models for CFD validation. ASAIO J 2017
  7. 150–160. [Crossref] 8. Gallagher MB, Aycock KI, Craven BA, Manning KB. Steady flow in a patient-averaged inferior vena cava—Part I: Particle image velocimetry measurements at rest and exercise conditions. Cardiovasc Eng Technol 2018
  8. 641–653. [Crossref] 9. Craven BA, Aycock KI, Manning KB. Steady flow in a patient-averaged inferior vena cava—Part II: Computational fluid dynamics verification and validation. Cardiovasc Eng Technol 2018
  9. 654–673. [Crossref] 10. Aycock KI, Hariharan P, Craven BA. Particle image velocimetry measurements in an anatomical vascular model fabricated using inkjet 3D printing. Experiments Fluids 2017
  10. [Crossref] 11. Stewart SF, Robinson RA, Nelson RA, Malinauskas RA. Effects of thrombosed vena cava filters on blood flow: flow visualization and numerical modeling. Ann Biomed Eng 2008
  11. 1764– 1781. [Crossref] 12. Nicolás M, Peña E, Malvè M, Martínez MA. Mathematical modeling of the fibrosis process in the implantation of inferior vena cava filters. J Theor Biol 2015
  12. 228–240. [Crossref] 13. Rahbar E, Mori D, Moore JE. Three-dimensional analysis of flow disturbances caused by clots in inferior vena cava filters. J Vasc Interv Radiol 20