Journals / Turkish Journal of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation / 2022 / Cilt: 50 - Sayı: 3

Serum Procalcitonin Levels in Postoperative Monitoring of Diabetic Patients with Posterior Lumber Vertebral Stabilization Surgery: A Prospective Comparative Study

Pages
201–206
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: In diabetic patients, the procalcitonin levels were significantly higher at all time points, predicting an augmented bacterial infection in those patients compared with the non-diabetic patients.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: To compare the serum procalcitonin levels and other infection markers released in response to the inflammatory response that develops secondary to the operation in patients with or without type 2 diabetes mellitus who underwent spinal instrumentation.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: Fifty patients, who belonged to the American Society of Anesthesiologist I-II, were between 18 and 65 years of age, and who had planned for posterior spinal instrumentation surgery were grouped into 2 as group I (n=25) type 2 diabetic patients (group DM) and group II (n=25) non-diabetic patients (group non-DM).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: In diabetic patients, the procalcitonin levels were significantly higher at all time points, predicting an augmented bacterial infection in those patients compared with the non-diabetic patients.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: To compare the serum procalcitonin levels and other infection markers released in response to the inflammatory response that develops secondary to the operation in patients with or without type 2 diabetes mellitus who underwent spinal instrumentation. Methods: Fifty patients, who belonged to the American Society of Anesthesiologist I-II, were between 18 and 65 years of age, and who had planned for posterior spinal instrumentation surgery were grouped into 2 as group I (n=25) type 2 diabetic patients (group DM) and group II (n=25) non-diabetic patients (group non-DM). On the operation day, preoperatively (T0), 5 minutes after intraoperative instrument placement (T1), on postoperative 24th hour (T2), 48th hour (T3), 3rd day (T4), 5th day (T5), 7th day (T6), 10th day (T7), and 15th day (T8), serum samples were obtained from the patients for the evaluation of procalcitonin, C-reactive protein, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and neutrophil values. Results: Procalcitonin levels were higher in the diabetic patient group at all time points (P .05). When the alterations in procalcitonin levels were compared between diabetic and non-diabetic groups, in diabetic patients, there were significantly higher increases in the first 6 timelines (P < .05). Conclusion: In diabetic patients, the procalcitonin levels were significantly higher at all time points, predicting an augmented bacterial infection in those patients compared with the non-diabetic patients.

🔖

Cite This Article

TOR, İ. H., URAL, S. G. (2022). Serum Procalcitonin Levels in Postoperative Monitoring of Diabetic Patients with Posterior Lumber Vertebral Stabilization Surgery: A Prospective Comparative Study. Turkish Journal of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Cilt: 50 - Sayı: 3, 201–206. https://ajindex.com/articles/418325

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Peng W, Liang Y, Lu T, et al. Multivariate analysis of incision infection after posterior lumbar surgery in diabetic patients: a single-center retrospective analysis. Med (Baltim). 2019
  2. 98(23): e15935. [CrossRef] 2. Fei Q, Li J, Lin J, et al. Risk factors for surgical site infection After spinal surgery: a meta-analysis. World Neurosurg. 2016
  3. [CrossRef] 3. Liu JM, Deng HL, Chen XY, et al. Risk factors for surgical site infection After posterior lumbar spinal surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018
  4. 43(10):732-737. [CrossRef] 4. Pull ter Gunne AF, Cohen DB. Incidence, prevalence, and analysis of risk factors for surgical site infection following adult spinal surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009
  5. 34(13):1422-1428. [CrossRef] 5. Zheng S, Wang Z, Qin S, Chen JT. Usefulness of inflammatory markers and clinical manifestation for an earlier method to diagnosis surgical site infection after spinal surgery. Int Orthop. 2020
  6. 44(11):2211-2219. [CrossRef] 6. Memar MY, Varshochi M, Shokouhi B, Asgharzadeh M, Kafil HS. Procalcitonin: the marker of pediatric bacterial infection. Biomed Pharmacother. 2017
  7. [CrossRef] 7. Müller B, Becker KL. Procalcitonin: how a hormone became a marker and mediator of sepsis. Swiss Med Wkly. 2001
  8. 131(41- 42):595-602. [CrossRef] 8. Meisner M, Tschaikowsky K, Spießl C, Schüttler J. Procalcitonin—A marker or modulator of the acute immune response? Intensive Care Med. 1996
  9. 22(S1):S14-S14. [CrossRef] 9. Liao JC, Chen WJ, Chen LH, Niu CC. Postoperative wound infection rates after posterior instrumented spinal surgery in diabetic patients. Chang Gung Med J. 2006
  10. 29(5):480-485. 10. Florio W, Morici P, Ghelardi E, Barnini S, Lupetti A. Recent advances in the microbiological diagnosis of bloodstream infections. Crit Rev Microbiol. 2018
  11. 44(3):351-370. [CrossRef] 11. Vashist SK, Venkatesh AG, Marion Schneider E, Beaudoin C, Luppa PB, Luong JH. Bioanalytical advances in assays for C-reactive protein. Biotechnol Adv. 2016
  12. 34(3):272-290. [CrossRef] 12. Schimmel JJ, Horsting PP, de Kleuver M, Wonders G, van Limbeek J. Risk factors for deep surgical site infections after spinal fusion. Eur Spine J. 2010
  13. 19(10):1711-1719. [CrossRef] 13. Wang X, Sun Y, Shao X. Predictive value of procalcitonin for infection of patients with type-2 diabetes mellitus. Exp Ther Med. 2019
  14. 18(1):722-728. [CrossRef] 14. Lee SH, Chan RC, Wu JY, Chen HW, Chang SS, Lee CC. Diagnostic value of procalcitonin for bacterial infection in elderly patients - a systemic